Talk:Nikolai Gumilev: Difference between revisions - Wikipedia


Article Images

Content deleted Content added

Line 15:

As I already explained [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Tagantsev_conspiracy#Looking_at_Russian_language_sources here] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3ATagantsev_conspiracy&diff=548431887&oldid=548316545 here], according to mainstream version (official version of governmental commission and books written by an independent historian who had access to archives), Gumilev was not involved in any military conspiracy, and the case was "completely fabricated": all victims including Gumilev were officially rehabilitated. [[User:My very best wishes|My very best wishes]] ([[User talk:My very best wishes|talk]]) 04:21, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

: Ru-wiki thinks differently. Apparently there was a conspiracy.--[[User:Galassi|Galassi]] ([[User talk:Galassi|talk]]) 04:51, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

::Wikipedia is not an RS. The 3-volume book by historian I quoted is. This is good historian, not [[Yuri Zhukov (historian)|Yuri Zhukov]], who wrote a "Handbook of Stalinist" and contributed [http://www.ihst.ru/projects/sohist/rg.htm here]. Do you want to tell that he actually committed the crime, even after the official rehabilitation? [[User:My very best wishes|My very best wishes]] ([[User talk:My very best wishes|talk]]) 05:01, 3 April 2013 (UTC)