Talk:Pedophilia: Difference between revisions - Wikipedia

Line 259:

:::::::Which proposal do you prefer, James? Do you mean Legitimus's? Mine? Either? [[User:Flyer22|Flyer22]] ([[User talk:Flyer22|talk]]) 00:58, 1 July 2010 (UTC)

:::::::::Sorry for the ambiguity. I think both are as good as anything in the professional literature. My personal preference is to include "primary" (and the best research uses it), but it is not unanimous among authors. (I do not think that "exclusive" is accurate, however, although there still exist some authors who do.)[[User:James Cantor |— James Cantor]] ([[User talk:James Cantor|talk]]) 15:02, 1 July 2010 (UTC)

::::::::::How would exclusive be inaccurate, James, given pedophiles who can only become sexually aroused by thoughts of prepubescent children and the ones who never focus on adults sexually? [[User:Flyer22|Flyer22]] ([[User talk:Flyer22|talk]]) 20:22, 1 July 2010 (UTC)

::::::::Okay, I added my proposal, which is in part Legitimus's proposal. I [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Pedophilia&diff=371121287&oldid=370802052 retained "primary or exclusive"] for the reasons debated above about "preference" and what I stated in this discussion about the DSM-IV already tackling "persistent sexual interest in prepubescent children." If anyone objects, of course let me know. [[User:Flyer22|Flyer22]] ([[User talk:Flyer22|talk]]) 01:18, 1 July 2010 (UTC)

===Further specification===