Line 121:
: I gave specific detail in my edit summaries for why the content was removed. Some of the content removed was not supported by reliable sources, or didn't have sources supporting it at all. In regards to NBC News -- that bit was deleted not because the source was unreliable, but because that piece of information had nothing to do with the political activities of the Koch brothers. Cheers, [[User:Comatmebro|<font color="green"><b>Comatmebro</b></font>]] [[User talk:Comatmebro|<sup>~Come at me~</sup>]] 02:36, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
::What are the specific concerns related to the POV tag in the Americans for Prosperity section?
==Request for comment notice: $44M of $140M raised by [[Americans for Prosperity]] in 2012 election from Koch-related funds==
[[File:Farm-Fresh eye.png|15px|link=|alt=]]You are invited to join the discussion at [[Talk:Americans for Prosperity#Request for comment: .2444M of .24140M raised by Americans for Prosperity in 2012 election cycle from Koch-related funds]].  Please contribute to the request for comment. Thanks. [[User:HughD|Hugh]] ([[User talk:HughD|talk]]) 17:26, 9 July 2015 (UTC){{Z48}}<!-- [[Template:Please see]] -->
This is an update to the request for comment and a request for wider participation. The RfC question asks for community feedback on a one-sentence addition to the funding section of a political advocacy group, [[Americans for Prosperity]]. The main source is a pair of reports in ''[[The Washington Post]]'', supported by [[FactCheck.org]] and the ''[[National Journal]]''. The proposed content summarizes a key finding of [[investigative journalism]]. The discussion of the RfC centers on the due weight of investigative journalism into the sources of funding of a political advocacy group that is generally not legally required to disclose their funders. Attention from uninvolved editors with some experience with articles on political advocacy groups, and with the appropriate application of [[WP:DUE]], [[WP:INDISCRIMINATE]], and [[WP:COATRACK]], is respectfully requested. Generous excerpts from the sources are provided in the statement of the RfC question for your convenience. This request for comment will probably be closing next week, so please help with this request for comment. Thank you in advance for your time and attention. [[User:HughD|Hugh]] ([[User talk:HughD|talk]]) 16:11, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
::I hit the wrong button; however, the thread should be removed as highly biased canvassing. — [[User:Arthur Rubin|Arthur Rubin]] [[User talk:Arthur Rubin|(talk)]] 01:59, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
== RFC on applicability and enforcement of BLP policy regarding content on this page. ==
|