Talk:Greek genocide: Difference between revisions - Wikipedia

Line 198:

:How about some real argument why this background piece is worthy being included in the intro? I say it is [[WP:UNDUE|undue]] in the intro, and irrelevant. It is the one who makes the claim who has to back it up, not the other way round, and you are not doing a good job at it. [[User:NikoSilver|Niko]][[User talk:N!|Silver]] 22:33, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

It seemed to me quite relevant, we`re not talking about a background info, but about what happened in this period of time..i keep backing it up, as you may read from above, problem here you two are not sort of people one can have a serious chat with..thts quite simple, the Turks being systematically massacred, just in the same period of time, is not a background info but the info itself..

:Most ridiculously, after waiting for so long you showed up with your discussion offer just when i revert the article back into its old format, and when i said that oi`m willgoing to proposeopen a separate Greek atrocities article if that normal format would be continued to be vnadalizedvandalized by you two..How mature a behavior indeed..

[[User:Laertes d|laertes d]] 23:06, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

---- <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Laertes d|Laertes d]] ([[User talk:Laertes d|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Laertes d|contribs]]) 23:01, 6 November 2007 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== Added OR tag ==