Talk:Rand Paul: Difference between revisions - Wikipedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 148: ::::::::::::If you want to give up, you're free to. However, neither of you has pointed out any inaccuracy in my summary, so I see no reason to stop. [[User:MilesMoney|MilesMoney]] ([[User talk:MilesMoney|talk]]) 02:54, 27 October 2013 (UTC) :::::::::::::Well, you are familiar with [[WP:TE]]. That is one reason to stop, perhaps. - [[User:Sitush|Sitush]] ([[User talk:Sitush|talk]]) 21:33, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rand_Paul&curid=11914121&diff=578920681&oldid=578896142 This edit] has us reporting that "Paul does not support [[same-sex marriage]]". In fact, if you follow the related [[WP:BLPN]] [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard&oldid=578919458#Rand_Paul thread], you'll see that it quotes the New York Times as saying: Line 161 ⟶ 159: ::You can oppose, support or remain neutral. If you don't support, you could either be opposing or remaining neutral. But we know that he actively opposes, so suggesting neutrality is inaccurate. ::It is not edit-warring to make a change in agreement with consensus. Contrast this with the edit we're talking about, which was made by someone who hasn't discussed it before or after. [[User:MilesMoney|MilesMoney]] ([[User talk:MilesMoney|talk]]) 15:21, 27 October 2013 (UTC) :::<small>I have just merged this section, which was headed "Massive understatement" and began with MilesMoney's message of 06:31, 27 October 2013. There was no need to start a new section about the same subject matter within 24 hours of a prior section being opened. The only possible purpose was to enable a point-y/drama-laden entry in the table of contents. - [[User:Sitush|Sitush]] ([[User talk:Sitush|talk]]) 22:35, 27 October 2013 (UTC)</small> | |||