Talk:Rebekah Jones: Difference between revisions - Wikipedia

Article Images

Content deleted Content added

Revision as of 23:04, 20 June 2020 edit

NedFausa

(talk | contribs)

Extended confirmed users

9,988 edits

← Previous edit

Revision as of 23:05, 20 June 2020 edit undo

Georebekah

(talk | contribs)

25 edits

Next edit →

Line 13:

:{{reply to|NedFausa}} Thanks for adding the connected contributor note. However, I don't agree with the inclusion of the COI template -- [[User:Georebekah]] is not a 'major' contributor to the article; that user mainly added a photo, additional alma maters, and the phrase "whistle-blower" (which is a fine descriptor also used by most articles in major media). [[␄]] –[[User:Nucleosynth|Nucleosynth]] <small>([[User talk:Nucleosynth|t]] [[Special:Contributions/Nucleosynth|c]])</small> 23:00, 20 June 2020 (UTC)

::{{reply to|Nucleosynth}} [[User:Georebekah]] is responsible for [https://tools.wmflabs.org/sigma/usersearch.py?name=Georebekah&page=Rebekah_Jones&server=enwiki&max= 25.45% of the total edits] made to [[Rebekah Jones]]. That makes [[User:Georebekah]] a major contributor. [[User:NedFausa|NedFausa]] ([[User talk:NedFausa|talk]]) 23:03, 20 June 2020 (UTC)

[[User:NedFausa|NedFausa]] {{reply to|Nucleosynth}} Using percent as a number of edits is grossly misleading. I didn't know how to use the formatting for the photo I provided so I changed it like five times. Again, I only discovered this page TODAY.