Talk:Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections: Difference between revisions - Wikipedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 391: ::::::{{u|SPECIFICO}} I have to agree - due to a lack of significance in independent secondary RS. I don't understand having more in this article more than offered in compromise. ---[[User:Steve Quinn|Steve Quinn]] ([[User talk:Steve Quinn|talk]]) 01:19, 20 February 2017 (UTC) ::::::{{u|SPECIFICO}} just {{diff||766776592||deleted the whole paragraph}} about Binney and McGovern, citing UNDUE and "talk page consensus". I'm sorry, we do not have consensus to remove it all, we are in the middle of discussing how to summarize it properly. Please self-revert. — [[User:JFG|JFG]] <sup>[[User talk:JFG|talk]]</sup> 05:04, 22 February 2017 (UTC) :::::::That's cause there was documented consensus. And please don't trot the "longstanding" pony around the track again. It's been rejected by multiple Admins and it's going to land you in the soup if you keep asserting it. [[User:SPECIFICO |<font color ="0011FF"> '''SPECIFICO'''</font>]][[User_talk:SPECIFICO | ''talk'']] 15:52, 22 February 2017 (UTC) ==Pierre Sprey== | |||