Talk:S-train (Copenhagen): Difference between revisions - Wikipedia

Line 25:

::::::: Let me just ask directly: Which possible '''benefit''' would it bring us to have articles about the service letters rather than about the actual lines? [[User:Henning Makholm|Henning Makholm]] 12:51, 27 May 2006 (UTC)

:::::::: Fair points. In the H article you would include what you would write in Frederikssund-banen and in C what would go in Frederikssund-banen and Klampenborg-banen. The only real benefit I see by doing it that way is line templates on the stations (e.g. "line H, previous station: example, next station: example" and "line C, previous station ..." etc.), and avoiding the confusion arising from the lines being called H and C on the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:S-tog.gif service map], but Frederikssund-banen etc. in the articles. [[User:Ghent|Ghent]] 13:10, 27 May 2006 (UTC)

::::::::: I am not sure from the above whether I have convinced you, but if not, it doesn't seem likely that the two of us can reach consensus by continuing this. How about we each create the kind of articles we'd like to have and then see what works best? I'm going to be bold and start writing some stubs on the physical lines. If somebody then creates articles about individual stations (which I think would be overkill for most of them), I can't see why one couldn't have service-based succession boxes on them even so. [[User:Henning Makholm|Henning Makholm]] 13:41, 27 May 2006 (UTC)