Content deleted Content added
Line 1,387: ::::A "group of companies named Skyway" did not change their name. The "group of companies named Skyway" does not have a legal name which can be "changed" as it is not a registered entity of any kind. Here is a statement from [https://www.fma.govt.nz/news-and-resources/media-releases/fma-reiterates-warning-about-potential-skyway-capitalswig-scam/ the article you linked to] which probably confused you: ::::{{cquote|''"Skyway Capital is also known as Skyway Group and has most recently branded itself ‘SWIG’ (Skyway International Group)." - Media Release by the Financial Markets Authority of New Zealand}} ::::If you know what "Skyway Capital", "Skyway Group", and "SWIG" are, you would know that they simultaneously exist in the present, either as separate legal entities or as an informal association of legal entities. SkyWay Capital is not "known as" Skyway Group and has never "branded itself ‘SWIG’" let alone as "Skyway International Group". Of the three, only one is promoting "education packages that include a component of cryptocurrency (tokens) associated with SkyWay", and that is "SWIG". ::::'''Details:''' Skyway Capital (now registered as SWI Inc.) is one of the SkyWay Group of Companies and their website is https://www.skyway.capital/ and such affiliation is stated by the "head" of the group [https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=auto&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.yunitskiy.com%2Fnews%2F2015%2Fnews20150224.htm on his own website]. SWIG stands for "Skyway '''Invest''' Group", '''not Skyway 'International' Group''', which is the other of [https://rsw-systems.com/partners two main investment parters], and their website is https://www.skywayinvestgroup.com/. This other investment partner company (''referred to'' as "SWIG") had been registered as "RSW Investment Group Ltd", and I found no evidence available free of charge that the registered company name has changed from that. What "changed" was the emphasis by management on the name "SWIG" in preference over "Skyway Invest Group" due to a multitude of reasons, including a reasonable one such as the fact that "Skyway Invest Group" is a group not of companies, but of investors, theoretically clarifying the relationships, as this entity certainly is NOT "Skyway Group" as so many people have mixed up. It seems that "the company" or "Sky Way Group of Companies" (which one is it??) can be notable even if it is not properly identified by the independent source said to be making it notable!<sup>[[User talk:Kmarinas86| talk]]</sup>2'''[[User:Kmarinas86|siNkarma86]]'''—Expert ''Sectioneer'' of Wikipedia 08:16, 2 October 2019 (UTC) *'''Oppose'''. (May as well make my stance official.) Per my analysis above, the article in its present state seems to be about a company or set1 of companies, not a product. So, at the present time, renaming this article to a "product" name doesn't make sense. I recommend that the two subject be split into two separate articles in order to differentiate the two subjects for each other. As stated above, after such a split, if the notability of the company/set of companies is questionable, that content as a standalone article can/should be nominated for [[WP:AFD]] to determine its fate. [[User:Steel1943|<span style="color: #2F4F4F;">'''''Steel1943'''''</span>]] ([[User talk:Steel1943|talk]]) 17:48, 25 September 2019 (UTC) | |||