Line 113:
:::::::::#They lacked inline sources and the alleged sources in the section are unverifiable; and
:::::::::#They broke the article.
:::::::::If you wish to reintroduce the edits in the appropriate section, properly referenced and without breaking the article then please do so. If yuyou are unwilling to do so, you should not expect anyone else to do so. This is a collaborative effort, we're not here to do your bidding. The only place to move the tag, if you're unwilling to demonstrate which facts are in dispute, then the only place to move the tag is out of the article. Moving it to the top of, or anywhere in, the article serves no purpose if you can't identify the facts that you dispute. --[[User:AussieLegend|'''<span style="color:green;">Aussie</span><span style="color:gold;">Legend</span>''']] ([[User talk:AussieLegend#top|<big>✉</big>]]) 12:00, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
: It has now been a week since the last post was made in this discussion, in which I suggested, as I did in my first post in 2012, that Pigsonthewing should add properly cited edits to the appropriate section of the article. It is 9 days since {{u|Bjenks}} asked Pigsonthewing to "clearly state which facts in this section are disputed so that they can be logically addressed". Pigsonthewing has done neither, only replying in the vaguest manner. Since the tag was first added in 2012, several editors have reviewed the section containing the tags and commented here. Other editors have simply removed the tag. Only Pigsonthewing seems to see any issue with the article as it stands and only he supports its inclusion. Since he does not seem to wish to "fix" the problems himsef and will not explain specifically what his problems are so that they can be addressed, it is time to remove the tag once and for all, so I intend doing that. Given the total lack of support for Pigsonthewing's position and his failure to specify the problems, restoration of the tag must be viewed as disruptive and appropriate administrative action will be necessary. --[[User:AussieLegend|'''<span style="color:green;">Aussie</span><span style="color:gold;">Legend</span>''']] ([[User talk:AussieLegend#top|<big>✉</big>]]) 14:51, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
::My replies are above, for all to see. I did not respond to your last post, because you've resorted to simply repeating earlier statements and already-answered questions. Until you accept that i) there is (as others have noted) an issue needing to be addressed, ii) that the disputed text includes valid citations and iii) propose or accept a way forward that does not deny these facts, it seems that the dispute cannot be resolved. Accordingly, and ignoring your empty threats, I have restored the tag, which you should not have removed. <span class="vcard"><span class="fn">[[User:Pigsonthewing|Andy Mabbett]]</span> (<span class="nickname">Pigsonthewing</span>); [[User talk:Pigsonthewing|Talk to Andy]]; [[Special:Contributions/Pigsonthewing|Andy's edits]]</span> 16:10, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
::What I wrote in that post was repeated because it was a suggestion made by another editor, that I had already made when you first added the tag, as I pointed out in that post. What others have noted there is "an issue needing to be addressed"? Who, other than you, agreed that the claims made by the original editor include valid citations? As for the "propose or accept a way forward that does not deny these facts", the way forward has been proposed several times, most recently in the post that you chose not to respond to. The dispute is easily resolved, as I suggested in that post, [[WP:SOFIXIT|fix it yourself]]. Unfortunately, it seems that you do not wish the problem to be resolved. If you did, you would have edited the article back in 2012. --[[User:AussieLegend|'''<span style="color:green;">Aussie</span><span style="color:gold;">Legend</span>''']] ([[User talk:AussieLegend#top|<big>✉</big>]]) 16:52, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
== Omission of the role of Peter Rice of Ove Arup ==
|