Talk:Thomas Jefferson: Difference between revisions - Wikipedia


Article Images

Content deleted Content added

Ebanony

(talk | contribs)

1,877 edits

Line 301:

::::You say "And your notion that outlawing this trade is not any form of opposition to slavery is sort of ridiculous. If it was not opposition, then what would you refer to it as..something that promoted it??" It's not "my notion" or opinion. Conspicuously absent is a reliable source (or any) to back your claims. Enough said on your regurgitation of debunked 20th century mythology. Yes, banning the slave trade was done in part to prevent slave rebellion (slaves from freeing themselves, something Jefferson strongly opposed - say in Haiti & in the Am. Revolution). There in no dispute on that. We're discussing a man who owned hundreds of slaves; he tortured his own slaves, hunted down runaways, asked for slaves to be killed for trying to get free. That is undisputed as well. [[User:Ebanony|Ebanony]] ([[User talk:Ebanony|talk]]) 15:21, 21 January 2011 (UTC)

:'''Torture'''? That's a new one. I suppose you can throw that one on the pile of other unproven theories and speculations that have frothed from the mouths of pot-head college prof's and their mentors since the 60's. (That occurred in the 20th century also, btw.) Why is torture not even mentioned in the article? In any case, mention was made about your comment in the lead. Again, it was an erroneous general comment which has been spelled out for you before, ("..did not oppose slavery as a politician..") that overlooked much and required other clarifications. As such it had/has no place in the lead. All the routine digressive claims about "debunked theory" is just more of the canned, stand-by, window dressing that's often employed to avoid moments like these. <br/>-- Also, if sources like ''Finkelman'' are as you claim and are in goose-step with your (very) narrow vision of Jefferson why is not 'torture', or anything that comes close to it, even mentioned in the article? <br/>-- Regarding your sentiment about the 20th century, a century I am assuming you were born and raised in, and debunked theory; what startling revelations have occurred in the 21st century that endows you with such 'new' insights into Jefferson's legacy? [[User:Gwillhickers|Gwillhickers]] ([[User talk:Gwillhickers|talk]]) 02:21, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

::[[User:Gwillhickers|Gwillhickers]] you highlight ''Finkelman'' and rail against "pot-head college prof's and their mentors since the 60's". He and Brion are living people, and "Editors must take particular care when adding information about living persons to ''any'' Wikipedia page". I suggest you remove that comment: "Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced and not related to making content choices, should be removed, deleted, or oversighted as appropriate." This "'''should be removed immediately and without waiting for discussion'''." [[WP:BLPTALK]] & [[WP:BLP]].[[User:Ebanony|Ebanony]] ([[User talk:Ebanony|talk]]) 04:53, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

===section break2===