Talk:Victoria Cross: Difference between revisions - Wikipedia


Article Images

Line 1:

{{Talk header}}

{{WikiProject Spoken Wikipedia}}

{{ArticleHistory

|action1=GAN

Line 51:

|otd11date=2020-01-29|otd11oldid=938168332

}}

{{Vital article|topic=Society|level=5|class=FA}}

{{Annual readership}}

{{WikiProject banner shell|class=FA|1=

{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1=

{{WPODMBanner|class=FAWikiProject Orders, decorations, and medals|importance=High}}

{{WikiProject Military history|class=FA|A-Class=pass|British=yes|Culture-traditions-and-heraldry-task-force=yes }}

{{WPMILHIST

{{WikiProject New Zealand|importance=high}}

|class=FA

{{WikiProject Australia|importance=high}}

|A-Class=pass

{{WikiProject United Kingdom|importance=high}}

|old-peer-review=yes

{{WikiProject Spoken Wikipedia}}

|British=yes

|Culture-traditions-and-heraldry-task-force=yes

}}

{{WikiProject New Zealand|class=FA|importance=high}}

{{WikiProject Australia|class=FA|importance=high}}

{{WPUK|class=FA|importance=high}}

}}

{{British-English}}

Line 78 ⟶ 72:

}}

==Legacy section, subsection "Memorials" - suggested improving addition==

== Source of bronze ==

There is an apparent omission in the subsection the addition of which would be an improvement in this Featured Article. During the years of the centenary anniversaries of the First World War (2014 to 2018) commemorative stones to VC recipients of the war were presented to and unveiled at the recipients' home towns. I have lost memory how that was organised, did a government department pay for them? Did it apply only within the UK? I know for example Oswestry in Shropshire received one, placed in Cae Glas Park, in honour of Harold Whitfield in 2018.[[User:Cloptonson|Cloptonson]] ([[User talk:Cloptonson|talk]]) 17:50, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

The article gives conflicting information on the source of the bronze used for the VC:

* (Introduction) 'Research has established that the metal for most of the medals made since December 1914 came from two Chinese cannon that were captured from the Russians in 1855'.

* (Manufacture) '… the metal used for almost all VCs since December 1914 is taken from antique Chinese guns, replacing an earlier gun. … A likely explanation is that these cannon were taken as trophies during the First Opium War …'

For consistency, would it be better to replace 'captured from the Russians in 1855’ and insert ‘possibly taken as trophies during the First Opium War.’?

A reference for the origin of the Chinese guns would help - is there one?

[[User:Hsq7278|<b style="color:#000080"><small>Hsq7278</small></b>]] ([[User talk:Hsq7278|<b style="color:#F80"><small>talk</small></b>]]) 17:21, 1 June 2018

:Thanks for spotting that. There's no evidence for Russian cannon, and there are sources for Chinese. I have corrected the article. I'm not aware of any source for the Opium War, but I suppose if we captured them from the Chinese then it was probably in one of the Opium Wars. I'm not sure that's good enough for an encyclopedia though. [[User:Richard75|Richard75]] ([[User talk:Richard75|talk]]) 19:43, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

There is a another slight inconsistency within the article. In the "Separate Commonwealth awards" section it says that the Australian and New Zealand medals are "cast from the same Crimean War gunmetal as the British VC" [[User:RichWA|RichWA]] ([[User talk:RichWA|talk]]) 14:03, 5 April 2019 (UTC)

== The Victoria Cross ranks with the George Cross as the nation's highest award for gallantry ==

The current article starts with:

:"The Victoria Cross (VC) is the highest and most prestigious award of the British honours system."

However the British government website does not back up this assertion.

*{{cite web | title=Medals: campaigns, descriptions and eligibility | website=GOV.UK | date=12 December 2012 | url=https://www.gov.uk/guidance/medals-campaigns-descriptions-and-eligibility | access-date=26 June 2019}}

It states:

:"The Victoria Cross is the premier Operational Gallantry..."

And also states:

:"The George Cross is the premier award given for non-operational gallantry or gallantry not in the presence of an enemy".

As the government web page:

*{{cite web | title='Heroes' gather for George Cross and Medal commemoration | website=Defence in the media | date=24 September 2015 | url=https://modmedia.blog.gov.uk/2015/09/24/heroes-gather-for-george-cross-and-medal-commemoration/ | access-date=26 June 2019}}

states:

:"Members of the Armed Forces can receive the GC for acts of gallantry not in the presence of the enemy, for example, military explosive ordnance disposal personnel"

So HMG probably considers that with the changing nature of warfare the MC is more likely to be awarded in the future and the British government does not want it implied that helping wounded men out of the line of fire of a robotic machine gun is any less valiant that a similar action against a manned machine gun.

This is not a particularly new position. In this 2006 British Government paper:

*{{cite web | title=Fact Sheets - Guide to Honours | website=Defence Internet | date=22 March 2006 | url=https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/+/http://www.operations.mod.uk/honours/honours.htm | ref={{sfnref | Defence Internet | 2006}} | access-date=26 June 2019}}

It is stated in the paper

:"The Victoria Cross ranks with the George Cross as the nation's highest award for gallantry."

and just a little lower down the same article:

:"The George Cross ranks with the Victoria Cross as the nation's highest award for gallantry,"

Because of the different age of the awards one can make a technical argument about precedence, but until a person is awarded both medals this is of academic interest only (angles on pinheads). As it is misleading for those who do not realise that prestige and precedence are not necessarily linked, it should not be presented in the lead, but if it must be mentioned then it should be in the body of the article.

Given the British Government's position what is the source that covers the first sentence in this Wikipedia article? -- [[User:PBS|PBS]] ([[User talk:PBS|talk]]) 13:16, 26 June 2019 (UTC)

==[[Lists of Victoria Cross recipients|Victoria Cross recipients]]==

;(Since the end of World War II)

===[[List of Victoria Cross recipients by campaign]]===

;[[List of living Victoria Cross recipients]]

* 20 individuals (15 UK, 0 CA, 4 AU, 1 NZ) have received the [[Victoria Cross]] since World War II.

* {{legend2|#e3d9ff|{{KIA}} denotes [[Victoria Cross]] awarded posthumously. Shown chronologically.|border=1px solid #AAAAAA}}

{| class="wikitable"

|-

! rowspan="2"| Recipient

! rowspan="2"| Service

! rowspan="2"| Unit

! rowspan="2"| Campaign

! rowspan="2"| Location

! rowspan="2"| Date(s)

! rowspan="2"| Awarded

! colspan="4"| [[Victoria Cross|VC]]

|-

! [[Victoria Cross|UK]]

! [[Victoria Cross (Canada)|CA]]

! [[Victoria Cross for Australia|AU]]

! [[Victoria Cross for New Zealand|NZ]]

|-

| style="background:#e3d9ff;"|[[Kenneth Muir (British Army officer)|Kenneth Muir]]{{KIA}}

| [[British Army]]

| [[Argyll and Sutherland Highlanders]]

| [[Korean War]]

| [[Seongju County|Seongju, Korea]]

| style="background:#e3d9ff;"|<span style="display:none">1950-09-23</span>23&nbsp;September&nbsp;1950{{KIA}}

| 1951

| {{ya}}

|

|

|

|-

| style="background:#e3d9ff;"|[[Philip Curtis]]{{KIA}}

| [[British Army]]

| [[Duke of Cornwall's Light Infantry]]

| [[Korean War]]

| [[Imjin River|Imjin River, Korea]]

| style="background:#e3d9ff;"|<span style="display:none">1950-04-22</span>22&ndash;23&nbsp;April&nbsp;1951{{KIA}}

| 1953

| {{ya}}

|

|

|

|-

| [[James Carne]]

| [[British Army]]

| [[Gloucestershire Regiment]]

| [[Korean War]]

| [[Imjin River|Imjin River, Korea]]

| <span style="display:none">1950-04-22</span>22&ndash;23&nbsp;April&nbsp;1951

| 1953

| {{ya}}

|

|

|

|-

| [[Bill Speakman]]

| [[British Army]]

| [[Black Watch|Black Watch (Royal Highland Regiment)]]

| [[Korean War]]

| [[Korea|Hill 217, Korea]]

| <span style="display:none">1951-11-04</span>4 November 1951

| 1952

| {{ya}}

|

|

|

|-

| style="background:#e3d9ff;"|[[Kevin Wheatley]]{{KIA}}

| [[Australian Army]]

| [[Australian Army Training Team Vietnam]]

| [[Vietnam War]]

| [[Trà Bồng District|Trà Bồng, Vietnam]]

| style="background:#e3d9ff;"|<span style="display:none">1965-11-13</span>13 November 1965{{KIA}}

| 1966

| {{ya}}

|

|

|

|-

| [[Rambahadur Limbu]]

| [[British Army]]

| <span style="display:none">010</span>[[10th Princess Mary's Own Gurkha Rifles]]

| [[Indonesia–Malaysia confrontation]]

| [[Sarawak|Sarawak, Borneo]]

| <span style="display:none">1965-11-21</span>21 November 1965

| 1966

| {{ya}}

|

|

|

|-

| style="background:#e3d9ff;"|[[Peter Badcoe]]{{KIA}}

| [[Australian Army]]

| [[Australian Army Training Team Vietnam]]

| [[Vietnam War]]

| [[Hương Trà|Hương Trà, Vietnam]]

| style="background:#e3d9ff;"|<span style="display:none">1967-02-23</span>23 February 1967<hr />7 March 1967<hr />7 April 1967{{KIA}}

| 1968

| {{ya}}

|

|

|

|-

| [[Ray Simpson (soldier)|Ray Simpson]]

| [[Australian Army]]

| [[Australian Army Training Team Vietnam]]

| [[Vietnam War]]

| [[Kon Tum Province|Kon Tum, Vietnam]]

| <span style="display:none">1969-05-06</span>6&ndash;11 May 1969

| 1970

| {{ya}}

|

|

|

|-

| [[Keith Payne]]

| [[Australian Army]]

| [[Australian Army Training Team Vietnam]]

| [[Vietnam War]]

| [[Ben Het Camp|Ben Het, Vietnam]]

| <span style="display:none">1969-05-24</span>24 May 1969

| 1970

| {{ya}}

|

|

|

|-

| style="background:#e3d9ff;"|[[H. Jones|Herbert Jones]]{{KIA}}

| [[British Army]]

| <span style="display:none">002</span>[[2nd Battalion, Parachute Regiment]]

| [[Falklands War]]

| [[Battle of Goose Green|Goose Green, Falkland Islands]]

| style="background:#e3d9ff;"|<span style="display:none">1982-05-28</span>28 May 1982{{KIA}}

| 1983

| {{ya}}

|

|

|

|-

| style="background:#e3d9ff;"|[[Ian McKay]]{{KIA}}

| [[British Army]]

| <span style="display:none">003</span>[[3rd Battalion, Parachute Regiment]]

| [[Falklands War]]

| [[Battle of Mount Longdon|Mount Longdon, Falkland Islands]]

| style="background:#e3d9ff;"|<span style="display:none">1982-06-12</span>12 June 1982{{KIA}}

| 1983

| {{ya}}

|

|

|

|-

| [[Johnson Beharry]]

| [[British Army]]

| [[Princess of Wales's Royal Regiment]]

| [[Iraq War]]

| [[Amarah|Amarah, Iraq]]

| <span style="display:none">2004-05-01</span>1 May 2004<hr />11 June 2004

| 2005

| {{ya}}

|

|

|

|-

| [[Willie Apiata]]<br /><sup>([[Victoria Cross for New Zealand]])</sup>

| [[New Zealand Army]]

| [[New Zealand Special Air Service]]

| [[War in Afghanistan (2001–present)|War in Afghanistan]]

| [[Kandahar Province|Kandahar, Afghanistan]]

| <span style="display:none">2004-06-18</span>18 June 2004

| 2007

|

|

|

| {{ya}}

|-

| style="background:#e3d9ff;"|[[Bryan Budd]]{{KIA}}

| [[British Army]]

| <span style="display:none">003</span>[[3rd Battalion, Parachute Regiment]]

| [[War in Afghanistan (2001–present)|War in Afghanistan]]

| [[Sangin|Sangin, Afghanistan]]

| style="background:#e3d9ff;"|<span style="display:none">2006-07-27</span>27 July 2006<hr />20 August 2006{{KIA}}

| 2007

| {{ya}}

|

|

|

|-

| [[Mark Donaldson]]<br /><sup>([[Victoria Cross for Australia]])</sup>

| [[Australian Army]]

| [[Special Air Service Regiment|Special Air Service Regiment (Australia)]]

| [[War in Afghanistan (2001–present)|War in Afghanistan]]

| [[Uruzgan Province|Uruzgan, Afghanistan]]

| <span style="display:none">2008-09-02</span>2 September 2008

| 2009

|

|

| {{ya}}

|

|-

| [[Ben Roberts-Smith]]<br /><sup>([[Victoria Cross for Australia]])</sup>

| [[Australian Army]]

| [[Special Air Service Regiment|Special Air Service Regiment (Australia)]]

| [[War in Afghanistan (2001–present)|War in Afghanistan]]

| [[Kandahar Province|Kandahar, Afghanistan]]

| <span style="display:none">2010-06-11</span>11 June 2010

| 2011

|

|

| {{ya}}

|

|-

| [[Daniel Keighran]]<br /><sup>([[Victoria Cross for Australia]])</sup>

| [[Australian Army]]

| [[6th Battalion, Royal Australian Regiment]]

| [[War in Afghanistan (2001–present)|War in Afghanistan]]

| [[Uruzgan Province|Uruzgan, Afghanistan]]

| <span style="display:none">2010-08-24</span>24 August 2010

| 2012

|

|

| {{ya}}

|

|-

| style="background:#e3d9ff;"|[[James Ashworth]]{{KIA}}

| [[British Army]]

| [[Grenadier Guards]]

| [[War in Afghanistan (2001–present)|War in Afghanistan]]

| [[Grishk District|Nahri Saraj, Afghanistan]]

| style="background:#e3d9ff;"|<span style="display:none">2012-06-13</span>13 June 2012{{KIA}}

| 2013

| {{ya}}

|

|

|

|-

| style="background:#e3d9ff;"|[[Cameron Baird]]{{KIA}}<br /><sup>([[Victoria Cross for Australia]])</sup>

| [[Australian Army]]

| <span style="display:none">002</span>[[2nd Commando Regiment (Australia)]]

| [[War in Afghanistan (2001–present)|War in Afghanistan]]

| [[Uruzgan Province|Khod Valley, Afghanistan]]

| style="background:#e3d9ff;"|<span style="display:none">2012-06-13</span>22 June 2013{{KIA}}

| 2014

|

|

| {{ya}}

|

|-

| [[Joshua Leakey]]

| [[British Army]]

| [[Parachute Regiment (United Kingdom)|Parachute Regiment]]

| [[War in Afghanistan (2001–present)|War in Afghanistan]]

| [[Helmand Province|Helmand, Afghanistan]]

| <span style="display:none">2013-08-22</span>22 August 2013

| 2015

| {{ya}}

|

|

|

|-

|}

All VC citations of those from the above table show exact dates except for the one from New Zealand, showing only a year.

Based on the references provided, I have included <u>18 June 2004</u> in the date column for Willie Apiata.

Concerning Willie Apiata's VC citation, writer Nicky Hager says "The most obvious sign of the block on information was that the Victoria Cross citation did not even include the usual details of where and when the act of bravery occurred." Hager uncovered those details and revealed the gunfight occurred in the early hours of Friday, June 18, 2004, in a remote part of dry and mountainous central Afghanistan, north of Kandahar. Continuing, Hager writes, "If there were secrets to protect about the June 18, 2004 gun battle, they were that it had little to do with fighting terrorism or making Afghanistan a safer or better place. In the years following these New Zealand patrols, central Afghanistan became more hostile and dangerous, not less. Willie Apiata was a good guy in a bad war", Hager concludes.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/5561042/US-played-dirty-Apiata-claims |title=US played dirty: Apiata claims |author=''Sunday Star-Times'' |date=4 September 2011 |work=[[Stuff (website)|Stuff]] |author-link=Sunday Star-Times |accessdate=16 September 2020}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books/about/Other_People_s_Wars.html?id=8IQiYAAACAAJ |title=Other People's Wars: New Zealand in Afghanistan, Iraq and the War on Terror |last=Hager |first=Nicky |publisher=[[Potton & Burton|Craig Potton Publishing]] |year=2011 |isbn=978-1-877517-69-3 |author-link=Nicky Hager |accessdate=16 September 2020}}</ref>

====References====

{{Reflist}}

{{ping|Moriori}} The above is a wikitable I put together for showing all individuals who have received the Victoria Cross since the conclusion of World War II, which itself is based off of the one at [[List of Victoria Cross recipients by campaign]]. I believe Willie Apiata's article should show the date that is missing from his VC citation someplace in his article. Best, --[[User:Discographer|Discographer]] ([[User talk:Discographer|talk]]) 10:48, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

== Victoria Cross recipients (part 2) ==

Another VC list? Please separate British VC and VCfA awards - the VCfA was named in honour of the British VC but is a unique award of the Australian Honours System and should be separate to British VC awards. [[User:Anthony Staunton|Anthony Staunton]] ([[User talk:Anthony Staunton|talk]]) 00:58, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

:The above wikitable listing is just for this talk page only with no intention of article inclusion anywhere, only archived history. Best, --[[User:Discographer|Discographer]] ([[User talk:Discographer|talk]]) 16:42, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

== Alleged equality with the George Cross ==

I will be removing this claim from various articles. The "reference" provided, {{tq|Letter from the Cabinet Office, Honours and Appointments Secretariat, dated 17 September 2020}}, is not a published reference. The only trace I can find of the text within it is in the Wikipedia articles it has been added to as a "reference". Should this claim have been made in reliable, published, references I have no objection to its restoration, but there is currently zero evidence the "reference" provided meets [[WP:V]]. [[User:FDW777|FDW777]] ([[User talk:FDW777|talk]]) 18:20, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

: The most interesting footnote I have seen in a long time. Where did it come from. I saw some newspaper reports which could be used as a reference but I would love to see the full letter. I laughed at the last sentence 'The George Cross is, however, sequenced in the Order of Wear after the Victoria Cross to acknowledge the historic seniority of the Victoria Cross and for the practical reason that two medals cannot easily be worn". Firstly because it contradicts the equality of the awards and second because every Anzac Day I see many veterans who have only been awarded campaign and service medals manage to wear multiple medals quite easily. My view has always been that both awards have equal prestige but that the VC is senior to the GC. Frankly, with no civilian GC awards for gallantry in the UK since 1976, 44 years ago, and with the last four civilian GC awards overseas, the GC is defunct for civilian gallantry in the UK and is now only for the Military or the occasional UK civilian overseas. [[User:Anthony Staunton|Anthony Staunton]] ([[User talk:Anthony Staunton|talk]]) 07:24, 26 September 2020 (UTC)

::To be fair you did leave out the last two words of the sentence which were "joint first", details about the Order of Wear can be found in [https://www.thegazette.co.uk/awards-and-accreditation/content/103440 The Gazette] or page 27 of the [https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/185990/response/459552/attach/4/ADR%20Part%2013%20Wearing%20of%20Decorations%20etc.pdf Army Dress Regulations]. I did look for references but as of last night but could only find two tabloid newspapers talking about a social media post by Elizabeth Windsor not the 17 September letter, both of which were listed as unreliable at [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources]]. [[User:FDW777|FDW777]] ([[User talk:FDW777|talk]]) 08:05, 26 September 2020 (UTC)

:Is [https://www.forces-war-records.co.uk/medals/george-cross-gc this] a safe source? <span style="border:1px solid green; padding:0 2px">[[User:The Banner|<span style="color:green">The&nbsp;Banner</span>]]&nbsp;[[User talk:The Banner|<i style="color:maroon">talk</i>]]</span> 10:41, 26 September 2020 (UTC)

::No. Scroll down to the "Sources" at the bottom. {{tq|Some of the material on this page was also partially derived from <en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ >}} [[User:FDW777|FDW777]] ([[User talk:FDW777|talk]]) 10:43, 26 September 2020 (UTC)

:::Sugar, did not see that. <span style="border:1px solid green; padding:0 2px">[[User:The Banner|<span style="color:green">The&nbsp;Banner</span>]]&nbsp;[[User talk:The Banner|<i style="color:maroon">talk</i>]]</span> 11:30, 26 September 2020 (UTC)

I will list the unreliable tabloid references, so people can see there is potential for change in the coming days. [https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/12751859/queen-elevates-george-cross-victoria-cross/ The Scum] use a headline of {{tq|Queen confirms the George Cross IS on a par with the Victoria Cross – ending years of speculation}}, which is followed up by the article itself claiming {{tq|A formal statement due tomorrow will end decades of speculation about the order of the gongs}} (the original article is timestamped 23 Sep 2020, 22:25, so "tomorrow" appears to have been postponed). [https://www.express.co.uk/news/royal/1339483/the-queen-news-george-cross-victoria-cross-ranking-queen-elizabeth-II-royal-family-latest The Express] claims {{tq|the Royal Family posted on Instagram: "The George Cross is the equivalent of the Victoria Cross, which rewards actors of bravery on military operations."}} Curiously I can find no evidence they did post any such thing on Instagram (unless it was posted as a "story" which disappears after 24 hours, which would seem somewhat unusual for an important statement), their George Cross image can be seen [https://www.instagram.com/p/CFfJWsmn9ti/ here] and does not appear to contain the claim the Express attribute to them.

So while it does appear they may be some official announcement in the pipeline (if you believe The Scum) it hasn't happened yet. [[User:FDW777|FDW777]] ([[User talk:FDW777|talk]]) 15:42, 26 September 2020 (UTC)

== Because of its rarity, the VC is highly prized ... ==

:The IP editor at [[George Cross]] claims "This has been proved with a UK authoritative letter from the Honours secretariat". Nothing has been "proved" at all, since there is no evidence this "authoritative letter" exists other than someone mentioning it in a footnote. [[User:FDW777|FDW777]] ([[User talk:FDW777|talk]]) 20:48, 26 September 2020 (UTC)

I am dropping ‘Because of its rarity’ and will start the second paragraph with ‘the VC is highly prized’. It is not rare compared to many medals including the George Cross, the four Albert Medals and the Conspicuous Gallantry Medals to name a few. The prestige of the VC has always been high and with so many now in public institutions, the number available for sale or auction is decreasing. [[User:Anthony Staunton|Anthony Staunton]] ([[User talk:Anthony Staunton|talk]]) 07:36, 2 May 2023 (UTC)

:: FDW777 I apologize for mocking 'joint award' a concept which escapes me. I was not mocking the decision, if it has been made, after 80 years to make them equal or equivalent awards. I was mocking the wording of the possible announcement. Australia in its Order of Wear specifically states that the VCfA and the VC are equivalent awards. If the MOD was serious, all they had to do was to look at the notes in the British Order of Wear for Order of Chivalry. ‘Those individuals who hold both Military and Civil Division Awards in the same Order of Chivalry wear both pieces of Insignia and if at the same level the first awarded is worn first’. It is academic since how likely is someone in the future to be awarded both the senior and junior highest awards. However, my interpretation of the statement is that today in the UK, both the VC and GC are of equal prestige and that the VC is the senior award. [[User:Anthony Staunton|Anthony Staunton]] ([[User talk:Anthony Staunton|talk]]) 05:58, 27 September 2020 (UTC)