Template:Did you know nominations/Grand Casemates Gates: Difference between revisions - Wikipedia


Article Images

Line 1:

{{#if:yes|<noinclude>[[Category:Passed DYK nominations&nbsp;from October 2012]]<div style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">

{{DYKsubpage

:''The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify this page.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|this nomination's talk page]], [[Talk:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|the article's talk page]] or [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]]), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. '''No further edits should be made to this page'''.''

|monthyear=October 2012

|passed=<!--When closing discussion, enter yes or no-->

The result was: '''promoted''' by [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 23:56, 1 December 2012 (UTC)<br />}}

|2=

====Grand Casemates Gates====

{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Grand Casemates Gates|Grand Casemates Gates}}

<div style="float:right;margin-left:0.5em;">

[[File:History Alive re-enactment.jpg|100x100px|Re-enactment of the Ceremony of the Keys at Grand Casemates Square]]

</div><!--

Please do not edit above this line unless you are a DYK volunteer who is closing the discussion.

-->

{{*mp}}<s>... that between April and October, drums and fifes are played daily at the '''[[Grand Casemates Gates]]''' ''(pictured)'' in [[Gibraltar]] to warn aliens to leave before the gates are shut?</s>

Line 17 ⟶ 13:

*ALT2 ... that at the Ceremony of the Keys, [[drum]]s and [[fife]]s are played at the '''[[Grand Casemates Gates]]''' ''(pictured)'' in [[Gibraltar]] to warn [[Alien (law)|aliens]] to leave before the gates are locked?

<!--

-->

:*''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/All Saints Church, Lydd]]

<small>Created/expanded by [[User:Aymatth2|Aymatth2]] ([[User talk:Aymatth2|talk]]). Nominated by [[User:Prioryman|Prioryman]] ([[User talk:Prioryman|talk]]) at 23:16, 15 October 2012 (UTC)</small>

<!--

*{{DYKmake|Grand Casemates Gates|Aymatth2}}

*{{DYKnom|Grand Casemates Gates|Prioryman}}

-->

; Per the discussion at [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know/GibraltarPediA Options]], Gibraltar-related articles are temporarily being reviewed by two individuals. In addition to the regular DYK criteria, at least one reviewer should also indicate whether they perceive any [[WP:COI|conflict of interest]] or promotional concerns about the article under review.IP addresses and Victuallers are not allowed to do the reviews.

Line 43 ⟶ 33:

:::::Thanks for the changes, they mostly address my concerns. Not sure what happened with the char count, I must've dropped a para when copypasting into the counter. Sorry about the menu, but it did stick out as problematic. I could just see the furor on WT:DYK: "DYK has no standards, rabble rabble, uses menus as sources, rabble rabble." As for the description, it would be nice, but not a DYK req. This reviewer is sated, I'll let Reviewer No. 2 add the tick mark if they are too. <span style="text-shadow: 0.2em 0.2em 0.1em #DDDDDD">[[User:The Interior|<font color="brown">The</font><font color="green"> Interior</font>]] [[User Talk:The Interior|(Talk)]]</span> 19:23, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

:*'''Review 2''':

:*<!--Make second review here--> [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Article is new enough and long enough, the image is licensed appropriately and the article meets all DYK criteria in my view. I have changed the proposed hook because the nominator had misinterpreted the paragraph in the article to refer to a daily event. [[User:Cwmhiraeth|Cwmhiraeth]] ([[User talk:Cwmhiraeth|talk]]) 07:20, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

:*[[File:Symbol possible vote.svg|16px]] I'm not convinced by the sourcing of the hook that this is current practice. The website, if one goes out far enough, is copyright 2002 by a person, not by an official source for the regiment, so it's presumably at least a decade out of date in addition to being of questionable reliability. A newspaper story, if one exists, would be more reliable. The article claims April and October ceremonies since 1933, yet this is from a 1951 page that clearly shows a January ceremony in that year. I imagine that some version of the hook could be constructed that reflects the facts as they can be nailed down; please be sure that the hook facts are all cited by the end of the sentence they contain per DYK rules. (In this case, the "April and October" part had not been so cited, and should have been.) [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 19:54, 24 November 2012 (UTC)

Line 50 ⟶ 40:

:*[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] I am happy with the new information on the ceremony in the article and the ALT2 hook. [[User:Cwmhiraeth|Cwmhiraeth]] ([[User talk:Cwmhiraeth|talk]]) 05:58, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

{{-}}{{#if:yes|</div></noinclude>|{{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Template talk:Did you know/{{SUBPAGENAME}}|[[Category:Pending DYK nominations]]|{{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Template:Did you know nominations/{{SUBPAGENAME}}|[[Category:Pending DYK nominations]]}}}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->