Template talk:Systems of measurement: Difference between revisions - Wikipedia

Line 50:

:The first thing that needs to be agreed is which articles should be included in the template. We then need to agree how they should be classified. My suggested list is the list given in the version of the article that EzEdit reverted. I am quite happy to adjust the classifications. [[User:Martinvl|Martinvl]] ([[User talk:Martinvl|talk]]) 20:16, 25 September 2013 (UTC)

It could be difficult to begin negotiating on the most contentious areas. I think it might be better to begin by looking at areas where we are more likely to find common ground. Then we could look at areas that are more contentious.[[User:Michael Glass|Michael Glass]] ([[User talk:Michael Glass|talk]]) 10:03, 20 October 2013 (UTC)

:Hi [[User:Michael Glass|Michael]]. I've worked with [[User:Martinvl|Martinvl]] before in this area; he certainly knows much more about the minutiae than I do. I think the only point of contention here is whether or not to include the following:

:*[[Comparison of the imperial and US customary measurement systems|Comparison of imperial and customary measures]]

:I believe all of the other articles are common to both version. My preference would be to include this. As to the classifications, the language used in previous versions may reflect terms of art, but I'll defer to Martin's expertise here. <small><span style="color:gray"><tt>[[User:Garamond Lethe|Garamond Lethe]]<span style="display:inline-block;vertical-align:-0.4em;line-height:1em">[[User talk:Garamond Lethe|t]]<br/>[[Special:Contributions/Garamond Lethe|c]]</span></tt></span></small> 18:31, 20 October 2013 (UTC)