User talk:Angela/Archive1: Difference between revisions - Wikipedia
m
m
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)Line 280:
When () comes back I want to nominate him for sysop (for real this time) I dont ask for much, but I ask that you support his nomination. Sincerely-[[User:Stevertigo|<strong>戴眩sv</Strong>]] 22:55, Aug 16, 2003 (UTC)
==Votes for deletion==
When you list a page on [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|Votes for deletion]] you ''must'' say "Listed on [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|Votes for deletion]]" on the page you are listing. Otherwise the page will not get deleted. --[[User:Maveric149|mav]] 23:38, 16 Aug 2003 (UTC)
The note is to inform the person who created the article that their work is being considered for deletion. It is also there to inform any readers that the article is being considered for deletion. This; 1) gives proper warning the author so as to give them a chance to defend their work and 2) informs readers that the article has serious issues. --mav
Line 324:
Thanks, Angela, but I'm referring to changes being made to [[Sega Genesis]] and a couple other pages. If you see the page history and look it over, I hope you'll understand at once my concern/confusion. Thanks for the prompt response, though! Let me know if you have any thoughts about the situation I'm referring to. [[User:Jwrosenzweig|Jwrosenzweig]] 23:24, 20 Aug 2003 (UTC)
:Thanks, Angela. I agree that it's not a good idea to discuss a single user at the pump...I felt weird putting it there, and that's why I left it intentionally vague. Hope I didn't violate the principles of [[Wikipedia:WikiLove|WikiLove]]. :-) I'll leave a note on his/her talk page, as you suggested. Thanks! [[User:Jwrosenzweig|Jwrosenzweig]] 23:38, 20 Aug 2003 (UTC)
==Pestering Brion==
"Hopefully Simple will be moved to the new software soon, so that won't be a problem in the future. It's on Brion's to-do list. Angela" - Maybe you could pester him a bit ;) -[[User:Stevertigo|<strong>戴眩sv</Strong>]] 23:35, Aug 20, 2003 (UTC)
Line 474:
:Wow, it certainly didn't take you long to get back into the heat of things Angela. If you want to stay sane, I suggest you stay clear of controversial things for a little while. It helps, trust me. [[User:Mbecker|{ MB <nowiki>|</nowiki> マイカル }]] 19:20, Aug 27, 2003 (UTC)
::Angela, I request you help with [[Wikipedia:List_of_central_issues]], especially if you are concerned about me leaving. Whatever I have left to offer Wikipedia, it's probably contained in my contributions to/about that stuff. The rest is details. If I am banned for standing up for an open transparent process versus [[User:RK|petty propaganda]], [[User:JoeM|mindless advocacy]] and equally absurd [[User:Jimbo_Wales|Virtual Stalinism]], that is hardly uncommon in the history of [[politics]], and perhaps par for the course here. But to have you depart also without making some attempt to redefine, from a serious [[editorediting|editorial]]ial and [[publisher]] perspective, what makes this mass of text acceptable as an encyclopedia, would be the true tragedy. We were here working together "for a reason", and, I think that [[reason]] must not be abandoned. Warmest regards from the pits of soon-to-be-banned-Hell, your friend [[User:EntmootsOfTrolls|EofT]]
== Thanks for sticking up for me ==
Line 568:
----
Thank you for letting me wade into the Heine user-page festival. It feels like a small version of the [[Wikipedia:Village pump|Village Pump]], what with everyone and their cousins contributing. I was uncomfortable with a statement of how an editor intended to deal with a user ("revert on sight") posted to their user page, and not their talk page. If there's one page a user should be able to edit, it's their own user page. --[[User:Zippy|Zippy]] 06:42, 31 Aug 2003 (UTC)
==Cars redirect==