User talk:B3251 - Wikipedia
2 people in discussion
Just as an FYI, your recent changes to List of people from Saint John, New Brunswick made it no longer fit the table transclusion scheme in List of people from New Brunswick. Not a big deal, but it came up in lint errors, so I fixed the transclusion as such. I just thought maybe you'd be interested in cutting down on what exactly gets transcluded with <onlyinclude>. I'd cut the lead and the footer myself, but it's probably better if someone closer to the topic decides on this. Gamapamani (talk) 06:22, 7 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
- Thanks for letting me know. It looks like the whole article as well as the other city articles need to be updated to fit the style of other "list of people from [province/U.S. state]" articles. I personally updated the Saint John one because I have a special interest in editing about Saint John-related topics, but if I have the time maybe I can pick ahold at updating the others and ultimately the province list as well. B3251 (talk) 16:31, 7 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
- We meet again, because List of communities in New Brunswick and List of cities in Canada got broken due to changes to List of cities in New Brunswick. I think this time I'll leave the fixing to you. :) Gamapamani (talk) 11:11, 2 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
- That's okay, thanks for letting me know. Apologies for the changes being made, I'm just trying to make improvements to certain lists in order to eventually nominate them for FL-status. It shouldn't be too much work, it's about time these outdated methods of displaying one list on another get fixed anyways! B3251 (talk) 11:15, 2 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
- No need to apologize, least of all to me. You may want to put up "under construction" notices on those affected pages, though, if the updates are going to take some time. Otherwise, other lint error fixers may end up spending time trying to figure out a way to do something about this that may or may not be necessary. Gamapamani (talk) 11:27, 2 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
- I'll try getting around to doing this by the end of the day, as well as hopefully doing the needed fixes. B3251 (talk) 11:52, 2 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
- Oh, and I'm with you on the lists within lists thing. It should at least be clearly documented with comments in the page code that it's being transcluded in other lists X, Y and Z, because how are people supposed to know about it otherwise? Seeing inclusion tags isn't quite enough to tell the story. Gamapamani (talk) 11:41, 2 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
- No need to apologize, least of all to me. You may want to put up "under construction" notices on those affected pages, though, if the updates are going to take some time. Otherwise, other lint error fixers may end up spending time trying to figure out a way to do something about this that may or may not be necessary. Gamapamani (talk) 11:27, 2 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
- That's okay, thanks for letting me know. Apologies for the changes being made, I'm just trying to make improvements to certain lists in order to eventually nominate them for FL-status. It shouldn't be too much work, it's about time these outdated methods of displaying one list on another get fixed anyways! B3251 (talk) 11:15, 2 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
- We meet again, because List of communities in New Brunswick and List of cities in Canada got broken due to changes to List of cities in New Brunswick. I think this time I'll leave the fixing to you. :) Gamapamani (talk) 11:11, 2 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
On 11 April 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Joseph Drummond, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Joseph Drummond, a key figure of New Brunswick's branch of the NAACP, staged a sit-in at a local barbershop whose owner proclaimed that he had "never cut a colored person's hair in 55 years"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Joseph Drummond. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Joseph Drummond), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Hello! Your submission of Shep (sculpture) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Malinaccier (talk) 01:28, 11 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
- I just replied, thanks for your review! B3251 (talk) 03:37, 11 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
- Great, I just gave it the "thumbs up." Nice article! Malinaccier (talk) 23:57, 11 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
- Thank you! B3251 (talk) 17:27, 12 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
- Great, I just gave it the "thumbs up." Nice article! Malinaccier (talk) 23:57, 11 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.
Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.
See also:
- Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
- Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes#Requirements to accept an edit, when to accept an edit
Just Step Sideways from this world ..... today 17:01, 13 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
Hello! Your submission of Le Moniteur Acadien at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Davest3r08 >:3 (talk) 01:00, 14 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2020s anti-LGBT movement in the United States, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vox.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:16, 20 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
Hello, B3251. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Hunting in Canada, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:06, 22 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
Hi B3251. Thank you for your work on Jacques Poitras. Another editor, CanonNi, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:
Great work! I've assessed the article as WP:CCLASS.
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|CanonNi}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
'''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk|contribs) 12:58, 30 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
Hi B3251. Thank you for your work on H. Avard Loomer. Another editor, Acebulf, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:
Very nice article
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Acebulf}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Hello! Your submission of Jacques Poitras at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! 🌙Eclipse (talk) (contribs) 22:52, 1 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2024 Loblaw boycott is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2024 Loblaw boycott until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Hi B3251. Thank you for your work on Irving Oil Home Office. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:
Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
hello! I notice you are active in updating photos of my family. I had to reach out to ask if you are by chance a relative? 2001:569:FBEF:CA00:68FA:FB5:C15B:85FE (talk) 16:50, 4 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
- Thanks for reaching out. I appreciate and understand the curiosity, though I am not a relative of Walter W. White. I just have a personal interest in expanding knowledge about New Brunswick (particularly Saint John and its municipal politics in this instance) on Wikipedia. Information that I've added to the article were retrieved from newspaper archives and the two photos that I've previously uploaded of White were sourced from online archives by UNB and the New Brunswick Museum. B3251 (talk) 17:29, 4 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
On 5 May 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Le Moniteur Acadien, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the first Acadian newspaper, Le Moniteur Acadien, was acquired in 2023 for just CA$1? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Le Moniteur Acadien. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Le Moniteur Acadien), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Hi B3251, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the autopatrolled user right to your account. This means that pages you create will automatically be marked as 'reviewed', and no longer appear in the new pages feed. Autopatrolled is assigned to prolific creators of articles, where those articles do not require further review, and may have been requested on your behalf by someone else. It doesn't affect how you edit; it is used only to manage the workload of new page patrollers.
Since the articles you create will no longer be systematically reviewed by other editors, it is important that you maintain the high standard you have achieved so far in all your future creations. Please also try to remember to add relevant WikiProject templates, stub tags, categories, and incoming links to them, if you aren't already in the habit; user scripts such as Rater and StubSorter can help with this. As you have already shown that you have a strong grasp of Wikipedia's core content policies, you might also consider volunteering to become a new page patroller yourself, helping to uphold the project's standards and encourage other good faith article writers.
Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! Schwede66 08:49, 5 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
- Thank you! B3251 (talk) 15:48, 5 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
Hi B3251, the reason I tagged it as UPE is because the creator, I'm tla, is a blocked sock of a UPE farm. Also note the article was just deleted in December, see WP:Articles for deletion/Jynxzi. S0091 (talk) 18:05, 5 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
- I would agree if the content within the article were actually written by the sock, but taking a look at the revision history shows that the only contributions made by the sock are the addition of sources during draft creation, a more footnotes needed template, and a submission comment. From what it seems, the entirety of the article has been written by unrelated editors, including one with a clear interest in online content creators, so adding a UPE tag in this instance does not seem justifiable as there is no clear indication of UPE. B3251 (talk) 18:37, 5 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
- Fair enough, B3251. I was not going to restore the tag anyway but wanted to explain why I added it. S0091 (talk) 18:55, 5 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
- All is well, I can't blame you for having suspicion. B3251 (talk) 18:57, 5 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
- Fair enough, B3251. I was not going to restore the tag anyway but wanted to explain why I added it. S0091 (talk) 18:55, 5 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 6 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
GalliumBot (talk • contribs) (he/it) 03:27, 7 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
Calling something vandalism while its not is considered a WP:NPA please read again the edit summary to understand why I did it and it was according to the policy the user was not allowed to create the article --Shrike (talk) 08:56, 7 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
- You invited to restore my edit to enforce the arbitration policy --Shrike (talk) 08:58, 7 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
- Changing the article from having content to a single sentence was absolutely unnecessary when all it takes is one request to WP:RPP, which I have now done. I’ve edited the article previously so blanking the page not only removed content made by other editors who may not have WP:ECP but also my contribution as well. I apologize if you feel that this is a personal attack, but I’m just WP:FOC. B3251 (talk) 10:26, 7 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
- You understand that you restored WP:POV statements that takes for granted words of Palestinian ambassador that accused IDF without any proof except his words such editing may be considered WP:TE --Shrike (talk) 11:48, 7 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
- Goodness, there's an image of her mutilated corpse dangling from a destroyed building. What more do you want? Otherwise, your blanking of the page (which included the removal of WP:RS) is your first edit in over three months and as much as I would like to WP:AGF that could in of itself be considered WP:DE. I would assume for you to have the quality of the article's best interests in mind, so why did you not make a WP:RFPP instead? B3251 (talk) 12:09, 7 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
- You understand that you restored WP:POV statements that takes for granted words of Palestinian ambassador that accused IDF without any proof except his words such editing may be considered WP:TE --Shrike (talk) 11:48, 7 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
- Changing the article from having content to a single sentence was absolutely unnecessary when all it takes is one request to WP:RPP, which I have now done. I’ve edited the article previously so blanking the page not only removed content made by other editors who may not have WP:ECP but also my contribution as well. I apologize if you feel that this is a personal attack, but I’m just WP:FOC. B3251 (talk) 10:26, 7 May 2024 (UTC)Reply