User talk:BU Rob13: Difference between revisions - Wikipedia

Article Images

Content deleted Content added

Revision as of 14:34, 6 May 2019 edit

Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, IP block exemptions, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors

244,334 edits

← Previous edit

Revision as of 18:32, 6 May 2019 edit undo

Renamed user mou89p43twvqcvm8ut9w3

(talk | contribs)

90,395 edits

Next edit →

Line 50:

:That motion was posted publicly for community comment for several days at [[WP:A/R/M]]. Perhaps get basic facts correct before throwing around wild accusations. This isn't something we did in a back room. We openly noted that we would start enforcing the policy about account security of administrator accounts. The policy notes that bureaucrats may resysop a compromised administrator account once they are satisfied that the admin is back in control of the account, and they may. The policy also notes administrators may be permanently desysopped for misconduct by ArbCom. Failing to abide by policy is administrator misconduct, and if a case were to find that an administrator failed to abide by policy, it would be well within the remit of ArbCom to permanently desysop them. If you want to file a case at ArbCom about ArbCom, that's patently silly, but I suppose I've seen you do more unusual things than that. ~ [[User:BU Rob13|Rob13]][[User talk:BU Rob13|Talk]] 14:00, 6 May 2019 (UTC)

::You mean the policy-changing motion decided on the page "Restoration of sysop privileges to Necrothesp" (it's better to provide links, you know, as I was talking about the statement sent out by the arbs)? Such motions are ''not'' open to community approval or not, the only people who may vote there are arbs, for crying out loud. The discrepancy with policy was noted there by EdChem, but brushed away by the arbs. I said "put some things to the community for comment '''and approval'''", which you clearly didn't, so your "Perhaps get basic facts correct before throwing around wild accusations." is again wildly off the mark. Then again, seeing what you have been up to lately, I'm not surprised. "Failing to abide by policy", right... [[User:Fram|Fram]] ([[User talk:Fram|talk]]) 14:34, 6 May 2019 (UTC)

:::Indeed, it is not subject to community approval whether the Arbitration Committee will enforce community policy. It is up to community approval what the community policy is. Feel free to start an RfC to change it. ~ [[User:BU Rob13|Rob13]][[User talk:BU Rob13|Talk]] 18:32, 6 May 2019 (UTC)

== Administrators' newsletter – May 2019 ==