Content deleted Content added
Line 2: | algo = old(15d) | archive = User talk:BU Rob13/Archive %(counter)d | counter = 1 | maxarchivesize = 500K | archiveheader = {{Aan}} Line 23: ::::So what happens now with Latt, whose only contributions are to vote on a keep? [[User:Ogress|'''Ogress''']] [[User_Talk:Ogress|<sub style="color:#BA55D3;">''smash!''</sub>]] 01:32, 27 June 2015 (UTC) :::::Nothing. I'm keeping an eye on the account, but unless there's strong behavioral evidence that links him to a sockmaster, there's nothing that can be done. Keep in mind that there's no rule against doing nothing other than voting in one deletion discussion (or even in many deletion discussions). Unless there's evidence of a link to other people taking part in the discussion, no rules have been broken (at least that we have sufficient evidence for). ~ <b>[[User:BU Rob13|Rob]]</b><sup>[[User talk:BU Rob13|Talk]]</sup> 02:04, 27 June 2015 (UTC) == Rollbacker == [[File:Wikipedia Rollbacker.svg|right|80px]] I have [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=rights&user=&page=User%3ABU_Rob13 granted] the "{{mono|rollbacker}}" permission to your account. After a review of some of your contributions, I believe you can be trusted to use rollback for its intended usage of ''reverting [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|vandalism]]'', and that you will not abuse it by reverting [[Wikipedia:Assume good faith|good-faith]] edits or to [[Wikipedia:Edit war|revert-war]]. For information on rollback, see [[Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback]] and [[Wikipedia:Rollback feature]]. If you do not want rollback, contact me and I will remove it. Good luck and thanks. – [[User:Gilliam|Gilliam]] ([[User talk:Gilliam|talk]]) 06:49, 25 June 2015 (UTC) :Thanks! I appreciate the trust and your help with the mass attack. ~ <b>[[User:BU Rob13|Rob]]</b><sup>[[User talk:BU Rob13|Talk]]</sup> 07:04, 25 June 2015 (UTC) :[[User:Gilliam|Gilliam]], what eased your mind about giving the WP:Rollback tool to an account as new as the BU Rob13 account? Sure, BU Rob13 does not edit like a [[WP:Newbie]] in the least, but I don't think you gave him the tool because you think he's not a WP:Newbie. [[User:Flyer22|Flyer22]] ([[User talk:Flyer22|talk]]) 06:13, 28 June 2015 (UTC) ::Not sure I understand the question, but BU Rob 13 is doing great for a newbie. As long as he doesn't revert good-faith edits & keeps out of edit wars he will have no problems with rollback.– [[User:Gilliam|Gilliam]] ([[User talk:Gilliam|talk]]) 06:18, 28 June 2015 (UTC) :::{{replyto|Flyer22|Gilliam}} While I would mourn the loss of Huggle, I'm happy to give up the rollback user right if there are significant concerns I am too new for it currently. In the long-run, there can't be any harm in continuing to edit as I am currently and requesting it back later, although it would lower my efficiency somewhat. This is not a request for it to be removed, just a note that I would completely understand if it were to be. ~ <b>[[User:BU Rob13|Rob]]</b><sup>[[User talk:BU Rob13|Talk]]</sup> 06:30, 28 June 2015 (UTC) ::::[[User:Gilliam|Gilliam]], I wanted to know what made you trust such a new account with this tool. You view BU Rob13 as a WP:Newbie, but I don't; just a brief look at his contributions [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2015_June_7&diff=prev&oldid=665924940 from beginning] to now is why that's the case for me. As is clear from [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Flyer22&oldid=668980718 the current state of my talk page], I generally don't trust editors who claim to be new but don't edit like a WP:Newbie at all; in my experience, even keeping [[WP:Assume good faith]] in mind, they more often than not turn out not to be WP:Newbies. But, yes, with the way that BU Rob13 edits with regard to problematic editors, it's understandable that you gave him WP:Rollback. [[User:Flyer22|Flyer22]] ([[User talk:Flyer22|talk]]) 06:42, 28 June 2015 (UTC) == Message == | |||