User talk:Bittergrey: Difference between revisions - Wikipedia

Line 10:

|archive = User talk:Bittergrey/Archive %(counter)d

}}

== Edit warring ==

[[Image:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px|left|alt=|link=]] Your recent edits seem to have the appearance of [[Wikipedia:Edit warring|edit warring]]&#32; after a review of the reverts you have made on [[:paraphilic infantilism]]. Users are expected to [[Wikipedia:Consensus#Consensus-building in talk pages|collaborate and discuss]] with others and avoid editing [[Wikipedia:Disruptive editing|disruptively]].<br>

Please be particularly aware, the [[Wikipedia:Edit warring#The three-revert rule|three-revert rule]] states that:

# '''Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.'''

# '''Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.'''

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|talk page]] to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] among editors. You can post a request for help at an [[Wikipedia:Noticeboards|appropriate noticeboard]] or seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]]. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary [[Wikipedia:Protection policy|page protection]]. If you engage in an edit war, you '''may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing without further notice.'''{{Break}}You know that both myself and FB object to the removal of these sources. Your claims and comments have achieved no support, and Cantor's hypothesis is not a [[WP:FRINGE|fringe theory]]. Stop removing it on the basis of your personal preference. Slow edit wars are still edit wars. [[User:WLU|WLU]] <small>[[User talk:WLU|(t)]] [[Special:Contributions/WLU|(c)]] Wikipedia's rules:</small>[[WP:SIMPLE|^{<span style='color:#FFA500'>simple</span>}]]/[[WP:POL|_{<span style='color:#008080'>complex</span>}]] 18:42, 13 September 2011 (UTC)<!-- Template:uw-3rr -->