User talk:Bradv: Difference between revisions - Wikipedia

Line 191:

:::Yes, I do believe we are agreed. The big picture of how to write an encyclopedia (or indeed, how to build a society) is important, and the overall trend has to be an upward one. It is easier to destroy than to create, so our systems and policies need to be biased toward continuous improvement. Therefore, crying ONUS at every change is detrimental to the project, and the burden is properly on all editors to work together to find compromise in order to improve the encyclopedia. The fact is, many of our articles are complete crap, and if ONUS prevents people from improving them it [[WP:IAR|must be ignored]]. – [[User:Bradv|<span style="color:#333">'''brad''v'''''</span>]][[User talk:Bradv|<span style="color:transparent;text-shadow:0 0 0 red;font-size:80%">🍁</span>]] 16:41, 5 September 2020 (UTC)

::::I feel that if disputed changes are made to text which has explicit or implicit consensus those contentious changes should not remain in place through a discussion and RFC process that could extend for over a month. [[User:Kolya Butternut|Kolya Butternut]] ([[User talk:Kolya Butternut|talk]]) 16:51, 5 September 2020 (UTC)

:::::Sure, if it's a legitimate dispute and not just one or two editors who don't like a new development. – [[User:Bradv|<span style="color:#333">'''brad''v'''''</span>]][[User talk:Bradv|<span style="color:transparent;text-shadow:0 0 0 red;font-size:80%">🍁</span>]] 16:53, 5 September 2020 (UTC)