User talk:C21K/Archive1/t - Wikipedia

Welcome!

Hello, C21K/Archive1, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Ism schism (talk) 19:56, 17 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Welcome to WikiProject Dravidian civilizaitions

I notice that you have put up a 'cleanup' tag on the entry for Bellary. Can you state a few examples on why you think this page needs a re-write? --Shree (talk) 14:59, 7 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Oops! I was reverting vandalism by the ip but didn't notice it was already reverted by you. I had not refreshed the page! Thanks --KnowledgeHegemonyPart2 17:18, 15 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Sir, Tulu nadu was a part of Kerala which stretched for Kanyakumary to Gokarna. Ofcourse Im not speaking about the present Kearala state. Kanyakumari is in Tamilnad and Gokarna is in Karnataka today. I'm speaking about the Kerala mentioned in many Purana's as "Parasurama Kshetra." Though it is mythology there is fossil evidence to prove that this land is formed at the same time.

One more thing is Tulu and Malayalam have same script. please refer the site http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Kerala. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.198.103.52 (talk) 12:10, 18 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Please provide reliable source, see WP:RS C21K^talk 12:13, 18 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

reliable sources are ancient text books like Garuda Purana and BhoogolaPurana. I will scan it and present it you. There is mention about Kerela even in Srimad Bhagavatha. But Nobody can hide information from people for a long time.... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.198.103.52 (talk) 12:16, 18 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

No need to scan, just cite it properly in articles. C21K^talk 12:19, 18 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thanks a lot... sorry for any misunderstanding. bye. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.198.103.52 (talk) 13:28, 18 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

ಜೈ ಕರ್ನಾಟಕ  :-) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.198.103.52 (talk) 13:49, 18 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Please note that people with the name Divya should be listed on Divya (name), not on Divya, which is a disambiguation page. Most of the names you are trying to add are already there, by the way. Please be more careful when making edits and do not delete valid entries. Thanks.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 00:47, 19 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hi, I noticed you sometimes use impolite language when discussing articles with other editors. Please remember that civility and refraining from personal attacks are core policies on Wikipedia. We don't want to scare editors away by personally attacking them. Thanks. Copana2002 (talk) 21:49, 23 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Sorry, I will not repeat it again. C21K^talk 11:29, 25 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

I noticed over the last few months that you have been trying to do some useful work on Karnataka related articles. Welcome and I hope you make many useful contributions. I also noticed a conflict of opinion between you and some IP's on pages like Tuluva, Kannadiga, etc. I would recommend that you dont bother getting into arguements with IP's because it serves you no good, nor does it resolve the issue. The very fact someone has not bothered to log in shows he/they are either drive-by editor(s) or dont-care editors. Your time and energy are better served when you focus on article creation. Have you though about writing Karnataka related DYK articles?. You can start from really small ones, like Vachana poets Siddharama, Chennabasava etc. As you noticed, I just completed a FA on Kannada literature in the Western Chalukya Empire, an article which has significant info on Veerashaiva poets. You articles can serve as useful wikilink articles for depth. If you have other ideas on what to write about, feel free to do so, an I can extend any help you want. There was a time when we had 3-4 Karnataka related DYK's per week, but that has dried out after user:Amarrg go busy with other things. ThanksDineshkannambadi (talk) 15:35, 26 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

No problem. Contribute any way you feel comfortable and dont call me "sir". Just Dinesh will do:)Dineshkannambadi (talk) 16:06, 27 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Comments are required at the article. Devanagari dispute continues. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 14:50, 10 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Please bold your name here if you are active and can be approached for an assessment request. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 05:17, 12 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

OK...U may keep the Kannada name...But give priority to Malayalam...Why???? Bcos in Karnataka Kannada language is forced on non-Kannada people....We dont do it in our state....We encourage other languages too...We provide Kannada education to Kannadigas....We dont force Malayalam on them...So u still see Kannada in Kasaragod....

We are not Language fundamentalistic people.....I hope u are not one....Any way nice of knowing u...Lets be friends...Bye....

Ok man...I will say....I do not have any enemity towards Kannadigas...Its just that official language is enough for the name tag of Kasaragod...This is just the thing that happened in Mangalore page....Unlike Kasaragod , this city has got many names like kudla(Tulu), Kodial(Konkani), manglooru(Kannada), Maikala(Beary) and Mangalapuram(Malayalam).....Whwn we said to include these names, the kannadiga wikipedians opposed it and they just deleted the mangalapuram name of Mangalore which along with other names was put up on the article.....Konkani name of Mangalore written in Devanagari script was also deleted....But they wanted kannada name for Kasaragod to be intact,which we did not allow........You can see the dispute in the mangalore discuss page...

So there is nothing with u or all the Kannada people...We just reached on a pact...thats all....

[[::User:ARUNKUMAR P.R|ARUNKUMAR P.R]] ([[::User talk:ARUNKUMAR P.R|talk]] · [[::Special:Contributions/ARUNKUMAR P.R|contribs]]) 12:37, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

Well they wiped all the evidence...Yes mangalore is called as Mangalapuram by Malayalees....It should be noted that Tulunaadu had ancient connections with Kerala...Mangalapuram was one of the earliest names of Mangalore along with manjarur and Kudla(Tulu)....A princess from Kerala was abducted by the prince of Tulunaadu and the princess died ....On her name was the famous temple of mangaladevi constructed...It is from this temple that all the name of mangalore originated(Mangalooru, Mangalapuram, Manjarur etc..) except for Kudla(Tulu), which seems to be the most ancient name for the city as Tulu people are the local people...

[[::User:ARUNKUMAR P.R|ARUNKUMAR P.R]] ([[::User talk:ARUNKUMAR P.R|talk]] · [[::Special:Contributions/ARUNKUMAR P.R|contribs]]) 11:03, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

field=science is perfectly fine (if you removed anywhere else, please undo it yourself).--GDibyendu (talk) 14:42, 30 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Please search for 'field=' in that page. Which 'field' can be used in assessment is left open for assessment team or whosoever assesses the article. You can check the categories from talk page also. There are a lot of articles already marked this way, Satish Dhawan was not the only one.--GDibyendu (talk) 14:53, 30 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Check this category Category:India articles using field parameter.--GDibyendu (talk) 14:54, 30 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Basically, the idea behind using the field parameter is to collect articles for possible (but non-existent now) workgroups like WP India School, WP India Science etc. After the introduction of this parameter one such workgroup was formed: 'Music'.--GDibyendu (talk) 15:02, 30 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

No problem, now you know, so probably you can also add it wherever it seems appropriate.--GDibyendu (talk) 15:05, 30 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Thanks. --Ultramegasuperstar (talk) 09:43, 1 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hello, have observed that you delete the Marathi name on the page each and every time. I have initiated a discussion for this on that page. But instead of debating, you just delete it. This is not right. And your recent comment says that only native labguage allowed. This is not correct. Go and check all over wiki and you will find so many pages bearing names in many languages. For eg Rajanikanth. It is generally the practice to write name in the language in which the person has made contribution along with the language of region where he was born. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nachiketdeo (talk • contribs) 17:09, 10 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

regarding rajnikanth article those 3 scripts are added based on consensus. see the past discussion there. C21K^talk 23:33, 10 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Read the discussion properly on rajnikanth page... it says "The language scripts of their mother tongue and their main career industry is only displayed.". I have just done the same thing... I feel both of us have better ways to pass our time than coming on this page everyday and writing/removing name in Marathi. Dont just tell me to read the discussion there...read carefully what it says. Rajnikanth, Bhimsen are the rarest of the people who have made huge contributions to the language other than there mother tongue and that has to be taken into account. Other similarity being the place where they live. Rajnikanth lives in Chennai not Maharashtra and similarly Bhimsenji has spent most of his life in Pune, not Karnataka. I am ready to discuss the issue with you... And if it were only a few songs in Marathi, I would not have done this. His contribution to Marathi sangeet is huge. See also Kishor Kumar, Ashok Kumar, Adi Shankara for the same type of example. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.242.65.34 (talk) 05:54, 11 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Discuss rather than quaralling... Nachiket 08:52, 11 February 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nachiketdeo (talk • contribs)

Category:People from Udupi has been nominated for deletion at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2009 February 15. Thanks, Kensplanet (talk) 16:46, 15 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Kanaka Dasa is from Bada village in Haveri district. Normally, a person is said to be "from a certian place" if he is born there or spent a significant amount of life there. Kanaka Dasa was no doubt devoted to the Krishna of Udupi, but like other Haridasas was always on the move. Puranadara Dasa was devoted to Vittala of Pandharpur, which does not make him a "person from Pandharpur". Regrads,Dineshkannambadi (talk) 01:31, 16 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hi, why was the marathi script removed from the article bhimsen Joshi? Swapnils2106 (talk) 12:33, 20 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

 Hi There is no such rule in the wikipedia. I think another user has clerified it in a post on your talk page earlier. Swapnils2106 (talk) 08:42, 21 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

There is no rule to add marathi. and the user you pointed is your sock(marathi fanatic) .C21K^talk 08:45, 21 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

There is no such rule in that article, please discuss on talk page of the article before deleting it. Swapnils2106 (talk) 09:04, 21 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Same applies to you. please discuss. C21K^talk 09:06, 21 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

DO NOT EDIT MY TALK PAGE. That user has a correct opinion about you. Swapnils2106 (talk) 12:57, 22 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

please read WP:NPA, i can edit if it is against wikipolicy. C21K^talk 13:01, 22 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. RexNL (talk) 13:28, 22 February 2009 (UTC)Reply