User talk:Cailil: Difference between revisions - Wikipedia


Article Images

Content deleted Content added

Factocop

(talk | contribs)

861 edits

m

(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)

Line 74:

== Enforcement ==

{{discussiontop}}

Hi Cailil, I am really really disppointed at your comments at my enforcement case. I had posted a comment on Rashers page in response to one of his comments at another page. That is not hounding. I was not aware that I was not allowed to post on his wall. And posting one comment, 1 comment on Mo-aimn page is not hounding. Also I was not aware of WP:POLELAC was a rule. How is posting two unrelated comments on my own wall a crime. not least breaking a rule that I was not aware of. Please help me for once, help work through these rules. You have to note that once I receive notification of WP:POLELAC from silktort, I removed the comments, but you didnt mention that in the enforcement case.[[User:Factocop|Factocop]] ([[User talk:Factocop|talk]]) 17:26, 23 September 2012 (UTC)

:You were told repeatedly by multiple sysops (including Silk Tork) to stop the ''ad hominem'' - you didn't. You were cautioned by myself and Silk Tork to drop the battleground attitude - you haven't. Your conduct, as Tim Canens noted, wouldn't be accepted from anyone - especially from someone who has had strict conditions for unblock, as given by Silk Tork on behalf of the BASC. <br>My comments to the AE thread at the start based on Mo's complaint were that your edit did not require sanction. However your conduct since then as been appalling. That conduct is why Tim & I are suggesting a topic ban. <br>Now I've already stated that if you want to discuss an on going Arbitration Enforcement thread to do so at the appropriate notice-board in order to keep issues together, so this thread is closed. <br>And for your information [[ignorance of the law|"ignorance of the law excuses no one"]] it is up to you to learn the rules not test their limits. And frankly someone who posts a link to WP:5 gives the distinct impression that they have in fact read it--[[User:Cailil|<font color="#999999" size="2">'''Cailil'''</font>]] <sup>[[User_talk:Cailil|<font color="#999999">'''talk'''</font>]]</sup> 18:04, 23 September 2012 (UTC)

{{discussionbottom}}