User talk:Chedzilla: Difference between revisions - Wikipedia

Article Images

Content deleted Content added

Revision as of 01:23, 20 September 2013 edit

Chedzilla

(talk | contribs)

Extended confirmed users

1,123 edits

← Previous edit

Revision as of 06:44, 20 September 2013 edit undo

Gerda Arendt

(talk | contribs)

Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers

373,895 edits

Next edit →

Line 63:

* Some good points being made here, and I'll respond in a day or two when I have a bit more time. — [[User:Chedzilla|Ched]][[User_talk:Chedzilla|ZILLA]] 01:23, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

=== "Wohltemperierte" discussion ===

I would like to point out the "[[User:David Fuchs|wohltemperierte]]" discussion about an infobox for composer [[Talk:Robert Stoepel]]. There were comments such as

"*A failed "proposal"? What are you smoking? The article should have an infobox, regardless of whether some content needs discussion. I have written many bios, and edited 1000s more, and never seen a fight over a legitimate infobox.--'''[[User:Milowent|Milowent]]''' • [[Special:Contributions/Milowent|has]][[User talk:Milowent|spoken]] 02:40, 24 March 2013 (UTC)"

The composer has an infobox, - the state of the art we had in March 2013. ''The Case'' looked only at a past before that. --[[User:Gerda Arendt|Gerda Arendt]] ([[User talk:Gerda Arendt|talk]]) 06:44, 20 September 2013 (UTC)