User talk:Darkhawk: Difference between revisions - Wikipedia
Article Images
Content deleted Content added
Line 50: I suggest that you properly research what the community consensus is regarding the reception sections of videogame articles before making any more similar unnecessary edits. Sales data is a common gauge of how well a game is received, and articles throughout the Wikipedia project feature information on sales figures when discussing the overall reception of games. --[[User:benlisquare|<span style="font-family:Monospace;padding:1px;color:orange">'''benlisquare'''</span>]]<sub>[[User talk:benlisquare|T]]•[[Special:Contributions/Benlisquare|C]]•[[Special:EmailUser/User:Benlisquare|E]]</sub> 19:12, 7 April 2015 (UTC) Nonsense. The absurdly detailed sales data posted under the section "reception" has been obviously put there by annoying fans trying to obfuscate how poorly the game was, in fact, received. If anything, a more neutral account would be : "A: this game sucked, but B: a lot of people still bought it anyway." The section really doesn't need to be any longer than that. - [[User:Darkhawk|Darkhawk]] |