User talk:Dbachmann: Difference between revisions - Wikipedia

Line 449:

:I already pointed out on [[WP:AN/I]] that the page protection was made by [[User:Angr]], not you as claimed by <s>Raucous01</s> [[User:Rokus01|Rokus01]] in 3 places. Bonnes fêtes, [[User:Mathsci|Mathsci]] ([[User talk:Mathsci|talk]]) 10:11, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

::I have even expressed disagreement with the protection, it isn't even as if Angr acted as my meatpuppet or something. In my book, Rokus' pov-pushing can and should be addressed by reverts, and if necessary sanctions against him, not by article protection. --[[User:Dbachmann|dab]] <small>[[User_talk:Dbachmann|(𒁳)]]</small> 10:21, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

:Indeed, it was my surprise to see you go that far to cut short a discussion. If you are serious on achieving mutual improvements on this subject, including the rightful interpretation and enforcement of WP policy, please play by the rules and have this silly protection revoked. This protection is tainted and turns against your personal credibility, whatever you or your proponents will have to say on it. It is crystal clear no editwar was at hand to justify such a full protect. If you agree as much as you say, I expect this to be resolved as soon as possible. By the way, reverts of sourced information should be addressed by Arbcom and so far the charge of pov pushing is on your side. [[User:Rokus01|Rokus01]] ([[User talk:Rokus01|talk]]) 18:18, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

== Courtesy Message ==

Sorry, this courtesy slipped my notice. Mathsci, thanks for making me aware.

{{ANI-notice}} [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#Dbachmann.C2.A0.28talk.C2.A0.C2.B7_contribs.29]

[[User:Rokus01|Rokus01]] ([[User talk:Rokus01|talk]]) 18:18, 23 December 2007 (UTC)