User talk:Denis19: Difference between revisions - Wikipedia


Article Images

Content deleted Content added

MalnadachBot

(talk | contribs)

11,637,095 edits

m

(14 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown)

Line 3:

|class="MainPageBG" style="border:1px solid lightgrey; background-color:lightgrey; vertical-align:top; color:#000000; font-size:85%"|

{| width="100%" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="5" style="vertical-align:top; background-color:lavender; padding:0;"

! <div style="margin:0; background-color:white; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:120%; font-weight:normal; border:1px solid lightgrey; text-align:left; padding-left:0.4em; padding-top:0.2em; padding-bottom:0.2em;">Hello, Denis19! '''[[Wikipedia:Introduction|Welcome]] to Wikipedia!''' Thank you for [[Special:Contributions/Denis19|your contributions]]. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place '''<tt>{&#123;{tlc|helpme&#125;}</tt>}''' on your [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] and ask your question there. Please remember to [[Wikipedia:Signatures|sign your name]] on talk pages by clicking [[File:Insert-signature.png|link=Wikipedia:How to sign your posts|alt=]] or by typing four tildes "~&#126;~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "[[Wikipedia:Adopt-a-user|adopted]]" by a more experienced editor or joining a [[Wikipedia:WikiProject|WikiProject]] to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Directory|here]] for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the [[Help:Edit summary|edit summary]] field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! [[User:Mr. Credible|Mr. Credible]] ([[User talk:Mr. Credible|talk]]) 08:18, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

|}

{| width="100%" style="background-color:white;"

Line 66:

== Establishment categories ==

About [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=15th_Waffen_Grenadier_Division_of_the_SS_%281st_Latvian%29&curid=11494116&diff=426387569&oldid=408261586 this and (apparently) many others], these were ''not established in Germany'' and do not qualify for that and similar annual categories. You might want to discuss @ the appropriate WikiProject pages before doing any more wholesale categorization. I don't look forward to undoing all your HotCat additions and it's not a good use of anyone's time. Best! [[User:Vecrumba|P<small>ЄTЄRS</small>&nbsp;<s>J</s>&nbsp;V]]<small> ►[[User_talk:Vecrumba|TALK]]</small> 15:48, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

:The SS formations in question were established by the SS which - as you might know - was located in Germany. Please raise the issue with the approbriate noticeboard if you disagree. --[[User:Denis19|Denis19]] ([[User talk:Denis19#top|talk]]) 16:34, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

:: The order was issued, however the units themselves were established in their respective occupied territories. The category is established "in" Germany not "by German authorities". 16:50, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

:::If that is how you see it, please try and find a [[WP:CONSENSUS|consensus]] rather than simply revert my edits. --[[User:Denis19|Denis19]] ([[User talk:Denis19#top|talk]]) 17:07, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

:::: If you wish to add content, the onus is on you to make the case. We already have appropriate categories for the establishment of military units. Personally, your use of the category appears to be outside the intended use as exemplified by articles categorized in other years. Establishing an army, for example, would apply, not army units. The categories is NOT intended for indicating the establishment of subsidiaries, so you entire use entering all SS units is ill-advised and inappropriate. [[User:Vecrumba|P<small>ЄTЄRS</small>&nbsp;<s>J</s>&nbsp;V]]<small> ►[[User_talk:Vecrumba|TALK]]</small> 17:15, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

:::::Currently it is you who argues against sources. So it is for you to find a consensus to delete sourced information, if you believe that these categories should not be used in this case. --[[User:Denis19|Denis19]] ([[User talk:Denis19#top|talk]]) 17:19, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

:::::: Ah, hang a label on editors so you can attack them. That will help your case. Not arguing against sources at all, only your abuse of the intent of the category. [[User:Vecrumba|P<small>ЄTЄRS</small>&nbsp;<s>J</s>&nbsp;V]]<small> ►[[User_talk:Vecrumba|TALK]]</small> 23:47, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

{{tmbox

| style = background: #f8eaba;

| image = [[Image:Sock block.svg|75px]]

| text = <big>'''Blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet'''</big>

'''''You have been [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] indefinitely''''' as a [[Wikipedia:Sock puppetry|sock puppet]]&#32;of&#32;{{user19|Dodo19}}&#32;that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are [[Wikipedia:Sock puppetry#Legitimate uses|allowed]], ''but'' using them for [[Wikipedia:Sock puppetry#Inappropriate uses of alternative accounts|illegitimate]] reasons is '''not'''.

If you are not a sock puppet, and would like to be unblocked, you may [[Wikipedia:Appealing a block|appeal this block]] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on the page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx" argument. -->{{tlx|unblock|Your reason here &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;}} below, but you should read the [[Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]] first. [[User:Favonian|Favonian]] ([[User talk:Favonian|talk]]) 17:24, 28 April 2011 (UTC)<!-- Template:SockBlock -->

}}

{{unblock reviewed | 1=This is a mistake! Obviously it was a poor choice to have a username starting with the letter D and ending in the number 19. Apart from that, if using Hotcat is a crime, just disable the thing. Personal attacks like this, actually reveal more serious problems than adding some categories nationalist editors from Eastern Europe don't like. Denis19 (talk) 17:31, 28 April 2011 (UTC) | decline=I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

*the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, <u>or</u>

*the block is no longer necessary because you

*#understand what you have been blocked for,

*#will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and

*#will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the [[Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]] for more information. [[User:Syrthiss|Syrthiss]] ([[User talk:Syrthiss|talk]]) 17:54, 28 April 2011 (UTC)}}

{{unblock reviewed | 1=I do not see, what I have done wrong, exept for pissing of some Eastern European nationalists who do not like to see their WWII heros as Nazi collaborators. So, where is the damage done to Wikipedia? Where is the disruption caused? Why are my edits not useful? Basically, this is a shoot first, ask questions later policy. I wonder how this corresponds to the five pillars mentioned above. Denis19 (talk) 19:19, 28 April 2011 (UTC) | decline=There's nothing in this request that I can review, since you do not address the reasons for your block. [[User:FisherQueen|FisherQueen]]<span style="font-size: smaller;"> ([[User talk:FisherQueen|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/FisherQueen|contribs]])</span> 21:00, 28 April 2011 (UTC)}}