User talk:DigitalC: Difference between revisions - Wikipedia

Line 44:

FYI, two of your last three comments at Talk chiropractic are missing their sigs. Normally a bot fixes that, but it doesn't seem to be working. -- <i><b><font color="004000">[[User:Fyslee|Fyslee]]</font></b></i> / <b><font color="990099" size="1">[[User talk:Fyslee|talk]]</font></b> 01:42, 1 November 2008 (UTC)

:Thanks for the headsup - I've gone and added signatures on them. [[User:DigitalC|DigitalC]] ([[User talk:DigitalC#top|talk]]) 01:58, 1 November 2008 (UTC)

== Circular arguments at [[Talk:Chiropractic]] ==

<small>Copied from the talk page to ensure you see this.</small>

We've tried gentle reminders and redirection here and that doesn't seem to be working, so let me put this very clearly one more time. Levine, DigitalC (and anyone else I missed making the same argument) the RfC was clear that SM was related to Chiropractic. I understand that you disagree with this outcome, but Wikipedia works by consensus. Any further argumentation along those lines should be dropped post haste or you may find yourself taking a break from the article for continuing disruption. If you have a concern about the '''specific''' wording of the section or a concern using a '''specific''' study from that section, please discuss that content issue directly. If you continue to stall work on resolving these disputes with another general argument that somehow SM research may not or can not or isn't good enough for the article, expect a topic ban to come shortly after. <font face="Tempus Sans ITC" color="#2B0066">[[User:Shell_Kinney|Shell]] ^{[[User_talk:Shell_Kinney|babelfish]]}</font> 22:06, 5 November 2008 (UTC)