User talk:Digitslain12 - Wikipedia
1 person in discussion
Hi Digitslain12! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing! I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 20:07, 18 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2023 New York City FC season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sean Johnson. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 6 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
United States v Jamaica (2002 FIFA World Cup qualification), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
I get your enthusiasm, but sections should be progressively unhidden as they come into effect, not all unveiled at once; empty tables look bad on the page. Additionally, for draft picks, positions shouldn't be linked, and trade notes aren't included, as we've done on past season pages. Please review past precedents before jumping to be "first" as too many others do. The Kip (talk) 18:52, 29 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
- Sorry about that. I'm not 100% familiar with the formatting and probably wasn't aware of the hidden stuff. I guess we can fill in the draftees. Thanks and have a great day. Digitslain12 (talk) 20:11, 29 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
Please do not add or change content, as you did at El Tráfico, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. SounderBruce 17:53, 9 July 2023 (UTC)Reply
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2023 Sporting Kansas City season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jacob Davis.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 16 July 2023 (UTC)Reply
Hey there, and thanks for your contributions to 2023 in the United States. I would like to request of you, however, to please reference your entires when you add them, as per the Wikipedia Reliable Sources policy. Also, please make sure to leave an edit summary; you can find more about this at our edit summary page. Thanks! InvadingInvader (userpage, talk) 16:13, 16 July 2023 (UTC)Reply
- Hi again – with regard to your recent edits, please make sure to add a citation for every event. Your recent contributions to 2023 in the United States saw you add only one citation for CONCACAF, and no citations for neither the floods nor the Long Beach killer. Please make sure to add citations. It's your responsibility to add citations, and unsourced material can be removed at any time. Thank you. InvadingInvader (userpage, talk) 17:37, 17 July 2023 (UTC)Reply
Please use sources to back up your claims, I managed to find a source for the 2023 controversy at the "Flag of South Vietnam" article but I can't find it for the 2022 football match, please mention where you found this news.
A typical source looks like this:
- <ref name="">{{cite web|url= |title= .|date=|accessdate= July 2023|author= |publisher= |language=en}}</ref>
You can copy this, fill in the fields, and state where you found both pieces of now unsourced information you added, otherwise I will add "{{Citation needed}}" tags to your additions. --Donald Trung (talk) 07:16, 27 July 2023 (UTC)Reply
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2023–24 C.F. Monterrey season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Maximiliano Meza.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 12 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
The {{goal}} template has parameters to handle multiple goals that should be used instead of adding a redundant template (and thus generating a second icon). Simply change {{goal|50}}, {{goal|60}}</nowki> to <nowiki>{{goal|50||60}} in match reports. SounderBruce 21:09, 21 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
Morocco in Beach Simonen1998 (talk) 00:58, 11 September 2023 (UTC)Reply
- I'm confused. Can you explain? Digitslain12 (talk) 03:32, 11 September 2023 (UTC)Reply
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of entertainment events at Crypto.com Arena, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Old Dominion.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:39, 7 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
how do you have so many edits in just 6 Months????? SupersaurYT (talk) 02:25, 23 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
- Because I do a lot of things here. Yeah, that's really it. We're not really special for it though. Digitslain12 (talk) 03:08, 23 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
- what do you mean by we're? SupersaurYT (talk) 19:35, 23 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
- Wikipedia editors. They’re not that special just because they have so many edits. But just keep editing. 159.115.9.46 (talk) 21:27, 23 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
- what do you mean by we're? SupersaurYT (talk) 19:35, 23 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
I noticed you adding info to the NHL season pages for teams. Please make sure you are are getting the goalie decisions correct. The decision goes to the goalie who allows the game winning goal (in a loss), or the goalie on the ice when the game winning goal is scored (in a win).
For example, on the Sharks page, you entered Blackwood on Nov 2 and Chrona on Nov 4, but those are both incorrect.
What actually happened was Kahkonen took the loss on Nov 4 (since he allowed the game winning goal), and Blackwood took the loss on Nov 6 (since he allowed the game winning goal). Canuck89 (Gab with me) or visit my user page 08:53, November 5, 2023 (UTC)
You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/AncientMinister2008. Thank you. – sbaio 14:32, 8 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
Responding to the message you left on my talk page: I don't have the ability to block someone, but I certainly think if he keeps it up it merits requesting a block. I left the standard-form admonition about edit warring on his talk page in order to establish that the proper warnings have been given, etc., so I assume the proper procedure is probably to wait a little while to see what the user does in response. It's certainly not our obligation to ferret back through the talk pages to find the old discussions. An anonymous new user isn't entitled just to say, in essence, "I wasn't part of that discussion so there's no consensus." (On the whole, I find the "it's called football" crowd to be very tiresome, though I try hard not to let my irritation show. No European reader is going to be confused or have any difficulty understanding an article that says soccer, just as no American reader is going to be confused by the use of British jargon like "kit" instead of "uniform" or "match" instead of "game.") 1995hoo (talk) 19:31, 30 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
- Yeah plus soccer links to association football anyways and the same could be said for things like pitch, kit, and match. But yeah have a great day. Digitslain12 (talk) 19:36, 30 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
- Take a look at the personal attacks the IP editor just lobbed at both of us on his talk page. I'm not sure whether they warrant another warning, but either way, I don't have time this afternoon to submit a report and I have a funeral to attend on Saturday morning. If you're inclined to submit a report, ping me and I will certainly submit a statement of support as soon as I'm able to find time. 1995hoo (talk) 19:21, 1 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
- Following up to say never mind—he's been blocked for 60 hours and the incivility and personal attacks were part of it. 1995hoo (talk) 20:09, 1 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
- Thanks man, was a little busy with life stuff but that was the right move made. Hopefully after two days he stops but I wouldn't be surprised if the user attacks us again. Digitslain12 (talk) 22:21, 1 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
- Following up to say never mind—he's been blocked for 60 hours and the incivility and personal attacks were part of it. 1995hoo (talk) 20:09, 1 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
- Take a look at the personal attacks the IP editor just lobbed at both of us on his talk page. I'm not sure whether they warrant another warning, but either way, I don't have time this afternoon to submit a report and I have a funeral to attend on Saturday morning. If you're inclined to submit a report, ping me and I will certainly submit a statement of support as soon as I'm able to find time. 1995hoo (talk) 19:21, 1 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
Hello, I'm Glman. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. glman (talk) 17:17, 8 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).
Digitslain12 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Hello Inzo, I understand that I was blocked because abusing multiple accounts is against Wikipedia's rules. However, I would like to state that I have done nothing wrong with this account and have only positively contributed to the site. All I want to do is continue my good work and help make the site more accurate and readable. I apologize for abusing multiple accounts and just want a second chance. Many of my past mistakes such as getting emotional while editing and vandalizing pages are no longer a thing and I stick to being as objective as possible. If you don't want to unblock me, that's fine and I'll leave it at that. I hope you have a great day and continue to maintain the site. Thanks.
Decline reason:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
This user is asking that their block be reviewed:
Digitslain12 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Hello Yamla, This is just a reply to you and your concerns (so you or other admins can automatically decline this), but since I can't directly reply to you on the previous request, this is what I will do (if you want me to directly reply to responses, please let me know how). Yes, on the investigation page I failed to disclose crucial information and lied about my past that would have proven that I was the same user. I did try to paint the IP and the previous user as seperate people despite knowing the full truth about those accounts being mine. I admit that it was a severe violation on my part and that I did evade the blocks and broke the sockpuppet rule. All I wanted was to be back so I could help the site out. I'm apologize for my behavior and will not do it again.
Notes:
- In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
- Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Hello Yamla, This is just a reply to you and your concerns (so you or other admins can automatically decline this), but since I can't directly reply to you on the previous request, this is what I will do (if you want me to directly reply to responses, please let me know how). Yes, on the investigation page I failed to disclose crucial information and lied about my past that would have proven that I was the same user. I did try to paint the IP and the previous user as seperate people despite knowing the full truth about those accounts being mine. I admit that it was a severe violation on my part and that I did evade the blocks and broke the sockpuppet rule. All I wanted was to be back so I could help the site out. I'm apologize for my behavior and will not do it again. |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1=Hello Yamla, This is just a reply to you and your concerns (so you or other admins can automatically decline this), but since I can't directly reply to you on the previous request, this is what I will do (if you want me to directly reply to responses, please let me know how). Yes, on the investigation page I failed to disclose crucial information and lied about my past that would have proven that I was the same user. I did try to paint the IP and the previous user as seperate people despite knowing the full truth about those accounts being mine. I admit that it was a severe violation on my part and that I did evade the blocks and broke the sockpuppet rule. All I wanted was to be back so I could help the site out. I'm apologize for my behavior and will not do it again. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1=Hello Yamla, This is just a reply to you and your concerns (so you or other admins can automatically decline this), but since I can't directly reply to you on the previous request, this is what I will do (if you want me to directly reply to responses, please let me know how). Yes, on the investigation page I failed to disclose crucial information and lied about my past that would have proven that I was the same user. I did try to paint the IP and the previous user as seperate people despite knowing the full truth about those accounts being mine. I admit that it was a severe violation on my part and that I did evade the blocks and broke the sockpuppet rule. All I wanted was to be back so I could help the site out. I'm apologize for my behavior and will not do it again. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}