User talk:Director: Difference between revisions - Wikipedia


Article Images

Content deleted Content added

Line 166:

:Which brings me to my next point: you are very much [[WP:INVOLVED]] in that article. That is not really disputable at this point. I perceive you as biased towards a particular content outcome, and with regard to your off-Wiki acquaintances. According to [[WP:ADMIN]], you are not qualified to issue sanctions to fellow involved users. Equally, you should not try to threaten and intimidate other users through "warnings". That is abuse of admin status.

:This is setting aside that your insinuations and accusations, being little more than unsubstantiated opinions, are in effect'' perI think it is, in that I have stricken my request for IZAK to cease participating, and have made it clear my opposition to the user is not based on his religion or ethnicity, but rather his pushing a political agenda through edit-warring and TE. -- Director (talk) 18:30, 2 May 2014 (UTC)sonal attacks.'' When you say to someone he is pushing antisemitic propaganda, or presuming to exclude editors based on their religion - you are slandering that user.

::::::Your point ''is'' nonsensical. Why does "not a Jew" imply "no interest in Jews or Communism"? And, conversely, why should being a Jew be a prerequisite to being "inclined to disassociate Jews and Communists"? Indeed, this is typical prejudice of the worst kind - and basically a textbook case of it. --[[User:Stephan Schulz|Stephan Schulz]] ([[User talk:Stephan Schulz|talk]]) 18:53, 2 May 2014 (UTC)

:I've reworded the post somewhat, to make my position clearer. And to avoid malicious misrepresentation of my comment. <font face="Eras Bold ITC">-- [[User:DIREKTOR|<span style="color:#353535">Director</span>]] <span style="color:#464646">([[User talk:DIREKTOR|<span style="color:#464646">talk</span>]])</span></font> 18:17, 2 May 2014 (UTC)

Line 173:

::::Sorry, but if your "opposition to the user is not based on his religion or ethnicity", why do you think it is necessary or helpful to mention his religion or ethnicity to begin with? Also, please keep [[WP:REDACT]] in mind when editing comments others have already replied to. --[[User:Stephan Schulz|Stephan Schulz]] ([[User talk:Stephan Schulz|talk]]) 18:36, 2 May 2014 (UTC)

:::::Because it would not make sense that anyone with a "right-wing/religious" point of view, with no interest in Jews or Communism, should for some reason be necessarily inclined to disassociate Jews and Communism. My point would be nonsensical if I didn't mention the user's ethnicity. It is quite absurd that I should "answer" here for ''daring ''to do so. <font face="Eras Bold ITC">-- [[User:DIREKTOR|<span style="color:#353535">Director</span>]] <span style="color:#464646">([[User talk:DIREKTOR|<span style="color:#464646">talk</span>]])</span></font> 18:45, 2 May 2014 (UTC)

::::::Your point ''is'' nonsensical. Why does "not a Jew" imply "no interest in Jews or Communism"? And, conversely, why should being a Jew be a prerequisite to being "inclined to disassociate Jews and Communists"? Indeed, this is typical prejudice of the worst kind - and basically a textbook case of it. It's not daring, it's disturbing. --[[User:Stephan Schulz|Stephan Schulz]] ([[User talk:Stephan Schulz|talk]]) 18:53, 2 May 2014 (UTC)