User talk:Eric Corbett: Difference between revisions - Wikipedia

Line 622:

**** {{ec}} I accept your argument and I am sure that both identities can coexist fairly uneventfully most of the time. It is only when the situation becomes overly controversial and/or political when the criticism starts and in that case disclaimers or clarifications of the two roles don't look very convincing. [[User:Dr.K.|Dr.K.]]&nbsp;<small><sup style="position:relative">[[User talk:Dr.K.|λogos]]<span style="position:relative;bottom:-2.0ex;left:-5.2ex;*left:-5.5ex">[[Special:Contributions/Dr.K.|πraxis]]</span></sup></small> 05:24, 29 October 2011 (UTC)

*****When did you ever see Kaldari qualify his arguments with Ironhold's disclaimer? Never? [[User:Malleus Fatuorum|Malleus]] [[User_talk:Malleus_Fatuorum|Fatuorum]] 05:29, 29 October 2011 (UTC)

******The point I am trying to make here is that disclaimers don't matter if the actions are so strong as to become controversial or political. Once the actions become controversial disclaimers will do nothing to persuade anyone about their propriety. [[User:Dr.K.|Dr.K.]]&nbsp;<small><sup style="position:relative">[[User talk:Dr.K.|λogos]]<span style="position:relative;bottom:-2.0ex;left:-5.2ex;*left:-5.5ex">[[Special:Contributions/Dr.K.|πraxis]]</span></sup></small> 05:40, 29 October 2011 (UTC)