User talk:Geometry guy: Difference between revisions - Wikipedia

Line 76:

==ownership culture==

*In my arbitration the [[WP:OWN|Ownership culture]] was mentioned as a distructive behavior for Wikipedia. But in this case, ownership or "lead editor" status was being assumed by others, e.g. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Moni3&diff=338503113&oldid=338493315] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Moni3&diff=338194819&oldid=338173172] So the sin is for me to accept it, since others are assuming it? Me being banned assures it. Wait until it is a FA as suggested. We will see who it "belongs" to. Regards, —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 16:58, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

:* All right, that's enough. I have intentionally stayed out of this, and yet here you are bringing me in ("ownership was being assumed by others ... "). That should be noted as a sample of how you escalate issues. Articlestats show that Moni3 is the lead editor there, plain and simple, no other assumptions. May I suggest that the mentors are heading into a danger zone here? Discussions are spread across multiple pages, and ''all'' related threads should be moved to and consolidated to the Monitoring page, where you can all deal with this in one place? That is its intended purpose, and in spite of other editors staying out, this does not appear to be de-escalating, so using the Monitoring page might keep everything in one place. [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 17:09, 18 January 2010 (UTC)