User talk:Hullaballoo Wolfowitz/Archive 12: Difference between revisions - Wikipedia
Content deleted Content added
m |
m |
||
Line 1,091: == Notice == [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrator_intervention_against_vandalism&diff=323641977&oldid=323639627 This report] may interest you. It seems to be related to [[Sal the Stockbroker]]. On an unrelated note, you should consider [[WP:ARCHIVE|archiving]] your talk page as it's takes several seconds to load. Regards. β [[User:Explicit|< ==Jesse James== Line 3,364: == Heroes in Hell merger == I realize this is a little ironic to ask, but do you have any objections to me following [[WP:BOLD]] and merging unsourced books from the series into the main page? [[User:I Jethrobot|< :I wouldn't have any objections; I nearly did it myself. If I remember correctly, some of the later anthology articles don't have contents information in them, which you can find at [www.isfdb.org ISFDB]. [[User:Hullaballoo Wolfowitz|Hullaballoo Wolfowitz]] ([[User talk:Hullaballoo Wolfowitz#top|talk]]) 19:19, 19 July 2011 (UTC) ::Thanks! [[User:I Jethrobot|< ::Okay, done and done (phew, my hands are tired). The page unfortunately did not provide additional content information for the books that were missing. I did not move all the books, just the ones that were missing references or whose references were poor at supporting notability. You are welcome to help clean up the page a bit. [[User:I Jethrobot|< ==Talkback== Line 3,468: ==Talkback== {{talkback|Talk: Heroes in Hell|Tag-team_promotional_editing_by_COI_editors_and_SPAs|ts=14:32, 12 August 2011 (UTC)}} [[User:I Jethrobot|< ==Talkback== {{talkback|Proposals_for_dealing_with_Gilgamesh|ts=04:24, 15 August 2011 (UTC)}} [[User:I Jethrobot|< == Help for the newbs.. == Line 3,479: == Heroes in Hell insanity == I just wanted to make it clear that I didn't mean to slight your efforts and, in my opinion, extensive research into this matter through my proposals. I just wanted to reach a consensus on this before it got out of hand. Some editors have mentioned that it might be possible to provide the actual contract via scans. Would you be receptive to reconsidering your position depending on what rights were written on there? Honestly, I do not think it is important to explain the difference between ''first serial'' and ''reprint'' in this case when the differences do not seem substantial. [[User:I Jethrobot|< I've given this some thought. I highly doubt we are going to arrive at a consensus on the discussion page, and I presume the page will be the subject of edit warring in the future between you and other editors. So, I've opened up [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard#Heroes_in_Hell.2C_Gilgamesh_in_the_Outback a dispute resolution page]. Maybe there we can clear this up. [[User:I Jethrobot|< == The Reemergence of the Gilgamesh Non-Consensus == Line 3,502: == Hell and insanity == You are welcome. [[User:Cullen328|'''< == Janet Morris == Line 3,518: == 3RR == Just wanted to give you fair warning that you are teetering very close to violating [[WP:3RR]] on [[Heroes in Hell]]. I know this discussion is long and plodding, but getting yourself blocked over this publication debacle is not really worth it. [[User:I Jethrobot|< :I've been quite careful about 3RR throughout these long discussions. However, I do think that the IP-hopper here is clearly acting in bad faith, and that his/her claiming I've somehow "modified" Google Books scans and US Copyright Office online records is a signal of vandalism rather than legitimate editing. [[User:Hullaballoo Wolfowitz|Hullaballoo Wolfowitz]] ([[User talk:Hullaballoo Wolfowitz#top|talk]]) 20:09, 25 August 2011 (UTC) == Possible sock == Did you notice the similarity between these edits?: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Gilgamesh_in_the_Outback&diff=446768596&oldid=446383448], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Gilgamesh_in_the_Outback&diff=446765490&oldid=446099118], and the fact that those statements are tied to [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/96.255.31.110 yet another IP's contributions]? I've opened up an [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Hulcys930 SPI]. This is too much. [[User:I Jethrobot|< == Jared Leto == Line 3,952: Please stop deleting perfectly legitimate edits I have made on the FDA and IBTS pages. Everything I have posted is referenced and is certainly not "axe grinding" as you dismissively claim. The ban on gay and bisexual men donating blood in these countries is a matter of great controversy and the agencies concerned have been heavily criticised for following such policies. It's only right then that this should be recorded on the pages concerned, and just because you may approve of the bans or believe they should not be controversial does not alter this reality. I believe you are being deliberately disruptive, having twice deleted my edits. [[User:PinkPolitico80|PinkPolitico80]] ([[User talk:PinkPolitico80|talk]]) 03:16, 18 November 2011 (UTC) PinkPolitico80 :I have left a welcome message on this new editor's talk page. PinkPolitico80, please do not try to read another editor's mind. You have no idea what this editor believes about the topic in question. Hullabaloo Wolfowitz is acting to ensure that these article are written from the [[WP:NPOV|neutral point of view]]. It is up to you to propose and discuss potentially controversial changes on these article's talk pages, and to gain consensus before adding such material. These additions are controversial by definition because at least two editors disagree with you. So don't get into a fight - instead discuss, debate and seek consensus. Thank you. [[User:Cullen328|'''< ::Indeed--Cullen is, as usual, right. But Hullaballoo, your attention is requested at [[Talk:Criticism_of_the_Food_and_Drug_Administration#Gay_Donor_Ban]] (by way of ANI). Thank you. [[User:Drmies|Drmies]] ([[User talk:Drmies|talk]]) 00:47, 21 November 2011 (UTC) | |||