User talk:Jehochman - Wikipedia


1 person in discussion

Article Images

Please leave a new message.

  1. I generally prefer to keep conversations on the page where they start.
  2. Please follow Strunk & White's advice, "Omit needless words!"
  3. Unblocks: If I block a user, any administrator is free to refactor the block unless I have specifically requested contacting me first.
  4. I may remove comments posted here if no response is needed, or if I respond elsewhere.

The above-linked Arbitration case has been closed and the final decision published.

PHG's mentorship and sourcing arrangement is both revised and extended; the full list of new conditions are available by clicking this link. Furthermore, the original topic ban on editing articles related to medieval or ancient history has been rescinded. PHG is prohibited from editing articles relating to the Mongol Empire, the Crusades, intersections between Crusader states and the Mongol Empire, and Hellenistic India—all broadly defined. This topic ban will last for a period of one year. He is permitted to make suggestions on talk pages, provided that he interacts with other editors in a civil fashion.

Any particular article may be added or removed from PHG's editing restriction at the discretion of his mentor; publicly logged to prevent confusion of the restriction's coverage. The mentor is encouraged to be responsive to feedback from editors in making and reconsidering such actions. Furthermore, the Committee noted that PHG has complied with the Committee's restrictions over the past ten months, and that PHG is encouraged to continue contributing to Wikipedia and Wikimedia projects. PHG should be permitted and encouraged by other editors to write well-sourced suggestions on talkpages, to contribute free-content images to Wikimedia Commons, and to build trust with the community.

For the Arbitration Committee,
Daniel (talk) 22:32, 2 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

[1] - Could you look into this? Seems this is turning into a chronic longer term issue - may want to adopt some sort of practices regarding this IP/user/individual whatever. Cirt (talk) 21:05, 3 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

And again - apparently switching IPs... Cirt (talk) 02:05, 4 February 2009 (UTC)Reply
Do you think these two are socks of Qwerty612 (talk · contribs) ? Cirt (talk) 03:02, 4 February 2009 (UTC)Reply
That seems plausible. If there is a continuation, I can semi-protect the page. Jehochman Talk 04:45, 5 February 2009 (UTC)Reply
Agreed. Okay, thanks. Cirt (talk) 12:54, 5 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

I'm wondering about the history behind this situation. This editor is editing using several different IPs. Here are three of them:

This is especially serious because he's editing policy pages. He is definitely attempting to avoid the scrutiny of other editors, and has admitted it on his talk page. Why is this being allowed? -- Fyslee (talk) 02:48, 5 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hello Fyslee and JEH. If you're making a list of this guy's recent IPs, here is mine:
212.200.240.194 (talk · contribs)
212.200.240.232 (talk · contribs)
212.200.240.241 (talk · contribs)
212.200.243.165 (talk · contribs)
212.200.243.174 (talk · contribs)
216.80.119.92 (talk · contribs)
I have no objection if anyone wants to file it at WP:SPI. The editor announced on the user page of his named account that he would only work with IPs from now on, so this is not precisely deceptive, it is just scrutiny-avoiding, and the T-word may apply. (He may have been trying to get a reaction out of us). There is a possibility that he is using the internet from a mobile phone supplied by this Serbian company: http://www.mobilnisvet.com/. He could be doing this from the US, since the guy appears to be based in Chicago.
Banning him wouldn't exactly stop him from editing. But it is at least thinkable to block anonymous editing of Wikipedia from this company's phones. Two or three /24 blocks would be a start.
My other idea is to list all the IPs he uses on his named user page, and full-protect the user page. He would still be allowed to edit. Such novel ideas are not always supported, but it could work. EdJohnston (talk) 04:02, 5 February 2009 (UTC)Reply
Please take this to WP:SPI so that a checkuser can look at the possibility of collateral damage and then place range blocks. Thank you. Jehochman Talk 04:45, 5 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

The next Connecticut Wikipedia meetup will take place sometime during April 2009 at Real Art Ways cafe and arts center in Hartford, Connecticut. Please list on the meetup page whether or not you can go. Also please contribute ideas for topics and dates! Hope to see you there!
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:48, 6 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Jehochman, how come you do not come for Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/CheckUser and Oversight elections/February 2009? There are many candidates who do not even enough experiences in SSP/RFCU cases unlike you. I admit that I have not fully read the "new policy" on the election, and nomination, but I think you are really qualified candidate. Is it too late for you running for the election? --Caspian blue 00:19, 7 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

I have become very busy in real life. The most I can do is pop in daily to keep moving a few articles forward and occasionally respond to requests for help directed to me. Jehochman Talk 05:07, 12 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

In my view, there should be an article about CyberLink, because they have got a sizable share of multimedia software market. I just created a really short stub, but I noticed you previously deleted CyberLink Corp. due to blatant advertising. If you have time, could you please take another look, may be there was something valuable there. --WeLoveSnakes —Preceding unsigned comment added by WeLoveSnakes (talk • contribs) 19:19, 13 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Nevermind. It was deleted. --WeLoveSnakes