Content deleted Content added
m |
|||
Line 1,172: :::I'm peeved by how you have completely overlooked my last statement about how despite being blocked I have (yes) evaded and made few contributions that were free of violating any policy. The whole reason of this blockage was because I simply copy paste existing materials. I don't do that again. Where’s the proof? (humans are always like “believing is seeing” why can’t they be more like “seeing is believing) – the proof are in my edits that I've made while I was block. For once, just for once, concentrate on how I have surpassed that infamous habit of copy-pasting (isn't that the prime reason for this embargo?). Yes I made a few figure mistakes (as pointed out by one of your colleague) because what the company reports, what the box office trackers in those countries reports varies sometimes. Lemme give you an example – the final box office figures for ''[[Transformers: Age of Extinction]]'' in China is argued between the [[Paramount Pictures]] reported $301 million and local data (especially Ent Group’s claim) that rises upto $320 million. Even in the US itself, the opening weekend number was $100 million (according to Paramount) while [[Rentrak]] (now [[comcast]]) reported $97 million. The other problem is in the UK, ''[[The Guardian]]''s figures are always different from what studios’ claim. Moreover, this is also similar with other markets like Japan, Korea, Italy, Germany and India and many other. But in all cases, I meticulously jot all figures from both local claims to studio reported. Who does that? I joined Wikipedia from 2014 and ever since my first edit in ''Age of Extinction'' I have followed this trend. You can go and check. Because I don't wanna be bias (which administrator admires this effort in wiki? NO ONE). Prior to 2014, all those opening and overall grosses for Hollywood movies in China are basically chosen from either studio reports of local claims (no consensus derived here). Any administrator cares on eliminating this so readers don't swallow incorrect infos? No ONE. I feel like sometimes Wikipedia is more like the UN Security Council (and General Assembly) that has been so politicized and merciless and should be more like the four main specialized agencies. I have wrote down I won't make the mistake again, proved I haven't for the past month, yet, still blocked. If you have any qualm over my future edits than I tell you what that Father told [[Superman]] in ''[[Man of Steel (film)|Man of Steel]]'' – “you have to take the leap of faith and the trust part comes second”. When I say leap of faith it basically means give me a third and final chance. I'm wearing my heart on my sleeves and swallowing my pride saying all these. I mean I would discuss with you over at a dinner table but that's inconceivable. It's not easy to stoop so low for a mistake you know would cost you big loss if u repeat it again. I just don't see how u don't see that. Just unblock me, spy me for the rest of my wikipedia life and just block me forever perhaps this time. Notice that I even confessed I've been editing (despite being blocked) because I am taking this seriously, I want no secrets, everything out in the open and on the table. No hiding behind the bush. Please take the leap of faith. I won't even say leap of faith, I say leap of assurance. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Josephlalrinhlua786|Josephlalrinhlua786]] ([[User talk:Josephlalrinhlua786#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Josephlalrinhlua786|contribs]]) </small> ::::From my perspective, the [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&action=view&page=Josephlalrinhlua786&type=block leap of faith took place on 21 August 2016] when you were unblocked on the assurance that you wouldn't commit copyright violations. After that, you committed ''copious'' copyright violations at [[M.S. Dhoni: The Untold Story]] and in other articles. These are not "mistakes". These are deliberate decisions that have lasting impact on the encyclopedia, and that require cleanup. We do not reward people who [[WP:SOCKPUPPETRY|evade their blocks]] by restoring their editing privileges. And frankly, based on how prolific you were with the copyright violations, I can't help but wonder if you were not a [[WP:PAID]] editor, which you would have been required to disclose. A person with academic interests is far less likely to take such grotesque shortcuts than someone who has a financial incentive to edit as furiously as he can. [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 17:16, 26 October 2016 (UTC) :::::Ya that's why they say “third times the charm”. Ive told u I'm ready to make amends and.. Oh forget it. I'm tired of convincing, trying to make assurance. None of the adversities here are dealt with a broad perspective and a pinch of faith. Allegations after allegations and accusations after accusations thrown at me. Nothing like “ok lemme give u a chance, if you mess up, you're gone forever.” Replies are more like “you're this, you're that.” “See this, see that.” Ive grown tired, so tired. Even after telling dozens of times I won't commit the same mistake again in the future and if I do block me to infinity and beyond, no consensus is in the horizon. The moment I'm like “I....” I get like “you're a thief at Walmart” whaaaaaaat!!!!!!! You have your valid points of how I have been ignorant and act like a stubborn child despite piles of red warnings and two block that have been pasted on my face, while I too am not justiciable in my claims of perseverance, dedication, commitment and hardwork. The winner takes it all, the loser has to fall. You're the administrator so you have the final verdict. YES or NO. Please, no more arguments and negotiations. Like I said, this will be my third and final plead. I wish that you rebuke the block but I'm fine with whatever your final decision is. If yes then a small statement to support that and vis-a-vis to the no answer as well. Good day. == Invitation from Wikipedia Asian Month 2016 == | |||