User talk:Laura bachrach - Wikipedia
1 person in discussion
Hello, Laura bachrach, and welcome to Wikipedia!
Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 22:08, 8 June 2016 (UTC)Reply
|
|
Hello! Laura bachrach, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! LaMona (talk) 20:57, 27 June 2016 (UTC)Reply |
THANK YOU VERY MUCH. Any chance you can point me to the exact page that tells me how to do this? I am very confused/frustrated.
Thank you, Joe Roe!
Laura bachrach (talk) 00:40, 18 August 2016 (UTC)Reply
Hello, Laura bachrach! I'm Joe Roe. I have replied to your question about a submission at the WikiProject Articles for Creation Help Desk. Joe Roe (talk) 23:40, 17 August 2016 (UTC)Reply
@Dane2007 - thank you very much!!!! can you let me know how I create the box that appears on the right hand corner of some articles?Laura bachrach (talk) 21:44, 5 September 2016 (UTC)Reply
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:
This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
The comment the reviewer left was:
Still basically his own advertised job listing and this is currently unacceptable, there's no inherited notability from anything or anyone else and so you will have to focus with adding and focusing with only the in-depth third-party news, and please not press releases, trivial passing mentions, interviews or other company-influenced triviality.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit
when they have been resolved.
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Walter Faulstroh and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
- You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
@Robert McClenon: Thank you for letting me know about IMDB! I have revised the references accordingly. Please let me know next steps of the review process. Many thanks, Laura Laura bachrach (talk) 20:15, 20 November 2016 (UTC)Reply
Hello, Laura bachrach. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Assia Grazioli Venier".
In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 04:41, 19 July 2017 (UTC)Reply
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Walter Faulstroh, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 27 July 2017 (UTC)Reply
Hello, Laura bachrach. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Walter Faulstroh".
In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. » Shadowowl Marcos Rodriguez | t | SPI | AIV | Sandbox | Helpdesk » 13:28, 31 July 2017 (UTC)Reply
Hello Laura bachrach. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, and that you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to Black hat SEO.
Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.
Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Laura bachrach. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Laura bachrach|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, please do not edit further until you answer this message. Template:Z159 SpitfireTally-ho! 03:14, 21 December 2017 (UTC)Reply
Hi. I do not work for the company nor do I have any financial stake in anything. I did not know that I was not allowed the edit the article that I started. Please let me know next steps. Thank you. (Laura bachrach (talk) 03:31, 21 December 2017 (UTC)).Reply
- Hi Laura, I found the website of a "Laura Bachrach" who works as a PR manager, and mentions on her website that she creates wikipedia articles for clients, I assumed that this was you. This especially seems likely since most your article submissions are for companies or individuals who require PR management.
- If you are creating Wikipedia articles as part of your PR management role, this is completely fine and you can continue, but first you must disclose this on your userpage following the instructions above. Failure to do so could result in you being blocked and bringing your company and clients into disrepute.
- However, if as you say, you are not a PR manager and are just editing for the joy of it, then that's great! That is completely fine and you can continue to edit as normal.
- Any other questions please let me know!
- Cheers, SpitfireTally-ho! 03:44, 21 December 2017 (UTC)Reply