User talk:Liance - Wikipedia

Hi there. You may be expecting this to come. Sorry if it bothers you but I'd just like to discuss the issue for improvement of draft. I recently created Boy & Dragon and I know it's kind of stub. Normally animations and cartoon do not receive that much of media coverage as other genres do. That's why I mentioned Animal Mechanicals and Brum (TV series) to get a clear idea how do things work in this category. Boy and Dragon has few independent references such as one from Sunderland Echo and other from Skwigly. I just want to discuss how do we improve pages in this category. Thank you for your time. Lunar Clock (talk) 22:17, 30 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

By any chance, did you manage to find my above message? Thanks. Lunar Clock (talk) 21:59, 2 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

So sorry for missing your message Lunar Clock!! Thanks for adding additional sources - upon reconsideration it definitely fits the notability criteria with your additions. I have gone ahead and accepted the draft into the mainspace. Thanks for contributing! -Liance^{talk/contribs} 02:19, 7 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

It's nice you took your time to respond. I know they are hard times but still thank you. Lunar Clock (talk) 05:27, 7 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for helping my Berklee students! Ijmusic (talk) 20:01, 7 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

No problem! Subtone was an article of excellent quality and I'm always excited to see new contributions to the wiki. Best, -Liance^{talk/contribs} 21:02, 7 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hi Liance,

I just got your notification about my article and would love to get some help on improving it the right way. I'm brand new here on Wikipedia and would like to learn to be able to contribute more! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mtennysdotter (talk • contribs) 18:07, 8 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hi Mtennysdotter - welcome! I see that since my review more references that include significant coverage have been added, which have been greatly helpful in establishing notability. At the time of review, I felt that not enough reliable references were added - for example, IMDb is not considered a reliable source, and some of the references did not include significant coverage. However, the draft is in a much better state now, and could definitely be considered for inclusion. Hope this helped! -Liance^{talk/contribs} 17:50, 11 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Thank you, I really appreciate the feedback. I'll keep working on the article! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mtennysdotter (talk • contribs) 00:29, 15 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hi, I added some more sources but not sure if it's enough or if there's anything else I should add to improve it. Do you mind to take a look at it again? Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mtennysdotter (talk • contribs) 18:55, 28 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Why you renamed this page from "Fats Domino Recordings" to "List of Fats Domino Studio Recordings"?

1. There are not only studio recordings, buth both studio and live ones, please look at entire article.
2. This is not only a list (titles only), but a session-o-graphy and discography of first release of each listed recording.

So your renaming seems be unjustified. In addition, you did this without any prior discussion, putting me as the author of the page before the fact. RocknRollArchivist (talk) 08:46, 10 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hi there, I felt that re-naming the article to a "list" was appropriate because the article primarily listed out recordings - additional information about each recording is appreciated, but does not change the fact that it a list per wiki standards despite additional table information (see Wikipedia:Stand-alone lists). However it is my mistake that I added "studio" to the title - I have since moved the draft again to rectify this mistake. Hope this helped. -Liance^{talk/contribs} 17:46, 11 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Maskoor_Usmani I occasionally edit Wiki articles and one of my recent page creation requests were declined. I researched and added more information post the rejection and also found out that the article adheres to Wikipedia's notability guidelines as there are over 70 credible references on the internet mentioning him. A Youtube search also reveals that he is a regular debater on national television in India. I plan to update the article with more information over time. Could you please share some insights on what to improvise upon, I really am trying to learn contributing to Wikipedia. AkkiDeutscher (talk) 13:55, 14 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hi Liance,

Thank you for the feedback for my submission of the UK Coronavirus Cancer Monitoring Project Wikipedia page. Since your review, there has been more coverage of the project, namely a commentary in a high-impact peer-reviewed medical journal (paper: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30230-8) and letters of support. Would addition of these references with other minor edits are likely to be sufficient for accepting the page?

Many thanks! TStarkeyBham (talk) 13:55, 16 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hi TStarkeyBham, so sorry for the long delay for a response. The draft seems notable enough for inclusion now. If you resubmit the article I could move it to the mainspace and accept it. Thanks, -Liance^{talk/contribs} 02:39, 16 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:35, 27 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hello Liance! Thank you for your feedback (within minutes versus the 5 weeks I anticipated). This is my first wiki attempt and am struggling with adding references and flow. The reason I think Dirk deserves a wiki page is that he is a an early Linux and open source contributor, going on to help found several of the open source foundations and calls to action on diversity and inclusion in this space. I have additional references to add: https://www.linuxjournal.com/article/3000 https://www.usenix.org/legacy/publications/library/proceedings/als00/2000papers/papers/full_papers/hohndel/hohndel_html/index.html and could add a list of links for keynotes. Is that would you are looking? Sincerely Malini Bhandaru (talk) 00:48, 6 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Liance, I got the hang of the edit UI and a sense of flow (I think) .. hope the major re-write addresses the concerns you raised. Looking forward to hearing from you. Wishing you a good weekend. Malini Bhandaru (talk) 08:08, 6 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hi Malini Bhandaru, I took a look at the draft. However, I noticed that nearly all (except one or two) sources with coverage directly related to Dirk Hohndel were interviews - these generally don't satisfy the requirements of being independent of the subject (which is criteria needed to satisfy notability for people. Additional sources that are independent and significant coverage of the subject might be needed. Hope this helped. -Liance^{talk/contribs} 03:54, 7 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hi Liance To review Alireza Kohany's page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Alireza_Kohany I am not Alireza Kohany! I'm just a fan of Alireza Kohany, If you look closely at the film's website, Alireza Kohany's roles in those films are mentioned. Is it possible to confirm the article?

Hi KohanyAlireza - firstly, I would recommend you change your username since your current name may imply that you are impersonating Alireza Kohany, which could be confusing for other editors and result in a block. Currently, the article's references do not meet the notability requirements which outline the need for additional references in secondary, independent sources; user-contributed websites like IMDb and wikipedia in other languages do not qualify for this. If you want the draft to be accepted then more sources will be needed. Hope this helped. -Liance^{talk/contribs} 03:47, 7 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Liance

Regarding your review and declining of this article on the Mish-mash dish: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Mish-mash_(food)

First of, thank you for your fast review.

I have added 3 more references to notable blogs in English. The problem is, I don't think there are many references in encyclopedias and science magazines about Balkan cuisine. This dish is neither controversial, nor widely spread around the world - it is just a beloved local dish tourists and locals eat around here. So many people around the world know what a Banitsa pastry is, or Tripe soup, yet look at the wikipedia pages on those subjects and there are no more reliable references than the ones I've provided - food blogs and local literature, something translated to English at best. My point is, I can dig up 50 more references for this stub article, and all food blogs and local cooking shows, but it will get ridiculous.

Also, is it common for a topic to be on disambiguation page, but to lack notoriety to have an article? - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mish_Mash

Also, I've asked here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk#19:15:39,_10_June_2020_review_of_draft_by_ShadowBee What is your oppinion? If you have any advise, I will appreciate it. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ShadowBee (talk • contribs) 19:58, 10 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hi ShadowBee, I have added a few more sources and accepted your draft. Thanks for your contributions! I will also add it to the mish-mash disambig page. -Liance^{talk/contribs} 21:20, 10 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Sorry to bother you, Liance. I just thought I'd say that WildEarth should be considered a "notable companies", as they are the most well-known organisation when it comes to live-streamed African safaris. If you disagree with this, and think another company is more well-known for it, feel free to let me know. Also, I updated it to include more news links, and also links to other companies and reserves that they work with. Redstoneprime (talk) 20:04, 10 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hi Redstoneprime - regardless of how 'well-known' a company is for inclusion the draft must demonstrate this by showing significant indepth coverage via multiple independent reliable sources (WP:CORP) - user contributed sources and those linked to the subject (WildEarth in this case) do not qualify, so this would include youtube, twitch, the company website itself, etc. Overall I felt that more indepth coverage was needed for this to be demonstrated. Hope this helps. -Liance^{talk/contribs} 21:26, 10 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Liance Understood. Redstoneprime (talk) 08:25, 11 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Great, let me know if anything else comes up -Liance^{talk/contribs} 17:38, 11 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Liance I've added some links to more news articles. If I find anything else I'll make sure to add them. Redstoneprime (talk) 08:47, 12 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hi Liance, I recently had n wiki article declined. Reason being, it read more as an advertisement. I have made numerous edits and I want to make sure the article fits the guidelines. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Sinical Mweberjr (talk) 04:35, 14 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hi Mweberjr, you should remove the external links from the body text of your draft since those are generally not used anywhere in the main content. Additionally, take a look at WP:NMUSIC for notability guidelines on music-related topics. Hope this helps. -Liance^{talk/contribs} 01:22, 15 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hello Liance,

prior to submitting my content, I did look through most if not all the pertinent material Wiki has on inclusion. I did not include multiple sources (see below) because the article would look busy in the draft format Wiki uses. My intent would be to include two to three (cited) references. in the published version because the formatting there allows for citing.

Is this acceptable or should I give up?

https://www.thesun.co.uk/tech/5785602/virtual-girlfriend-ar-blade-runner-2049/

https://optocrypto.com/soon-virtual-girlfriend-ar-will-available-download-hololens/

https://virtualrealityreporter.com/3d-hologroup-release-3d-holo-girlfriend-ar-app/

https://www.corecommunique.com/3d-hologroup-inc-has-released-the-first-adult-oriented-augmented-reality-content-for-microsofts-hololens-and-meta-visions-meta2-with-its-opening-of-3d-holo-girlfriend/

https://mspoweruser.com/first-adult-title-comes-to-the-microsoft-hololens/

https://www.quora.com/What-are-the-best-AR-porn-sites-in-2018

https://www.deccanchronicle.com/technology/in-other-news/210318/make-virtual-girlfriend-hololens-augmented-reality-hologram.html

Mlcastellanos - these sources should be cited in the draft article via inline citations, as they are the only way a subject can establish notability on wikipedia. This can be done with <ref> tags, and external links in the body should be removed. As long as your provided sources are secondary and independent of the subject they are acceptable. Hope this helps. -Liance^{talk/contribs} 01:25, 15 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hello Liance, what about putting information about the college in a section about educational institutions in the article about Yamfo? Then the draft can be deleted until the college achieves enough notoriety to justify an article. Thanks, ... PeterEasthope (talk) 21:08, 15 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hi PeterEasthope, if you feel like notability can't be established at this moment if the college is notable in the area I feel that a mention in the article Yamfo would be appropriate. -Liance^{talk/contribs} 03:47, 16 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Criteria in Wikipedia should be established objectively. Compliance should not be the opinion of one person.

CoHY is growing as rapidly as any college in my locale. Program offerings and courses will grow. Within a lifetime, CoHY is likely to become a university. In principle CoHY is as notable as many other institutions having articles. But how is notability established? With contemporary electronic communications there is no hardcopy newspaper with a story about CoHY.

Please have a look at the article about Douglas College. The references to Global News and to the Vancouver Sun give blank pages. Those references are effectively dead. The last reference is to a Province of BC page addressing accreditation of institutions in general; no mention of Douglas College. The other references are internal. The Douglas College article really doesn't have references satisfying notability criteria. Many similar examples exist and I don't mean to criticize the DC article in particular. The only way I see to satisfy notability honestly is for the institution to have faculty who publish notable scholarly work. Work which is published in scientific and other journals and can be cited. Criteria should apply honestly and without discrimination. Regards, ... PeterEasthope (talk) 14:15, 16 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

PeterEasthope, please read up on the Wikipedia notability guidelines which require articles to be supported by reliable sources in secondary, independent publications - currently your draft reflects none of this and cannot be accepted in this form. If your subject is "as notable as many other institutions having articles" then sources must be provided to show this, otherwise that notability does not exist by Wikipedia standards. Douglas College is easily notable, there is no such thing as a "dead reference" (in that case most news articles published in the past would be considered dead, which is absurd) and Google easily brings up many more reliable sources. If you think your subject also has notability please show this through the use of references. Thx -Liance^{talk/contribs} 16:09, 16 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Liance, thank you for the warm welcome. Working on some drafts now, valiant sir! Newmusicgeeking (talk) 03:42, 16 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Newmusicgeeking that's great to hear, let me know if anything is needed! -Liance^{talk/contribs} 03:46, 16 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hi Liance, Thanks for looking at the draft page for Lary Walker. I think the content of the page is reasonable, but there is a bit of redundancy because I list some of his important publications, and then some of them also show up in the reference section. Do you think this is a problem? I SHOULD be better at all of this, because I have my students do Wiki pages for class, so apologies. But, at least this adventure is getting me to become more comfortable with the editing process! BrainMan2017 (talk) 16:29, 16 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hi BrainMan2017 - I think that should be fine, as long as academic notability is shown via reliable, independent secondary sources as well. -Liance^{talk/contribs} 00:51, 17 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Liance, Super. Thanks for reviewing the page!! BrainMan2017 (talk) 02:50, 17 June 2020 (UTC) Liance, I actually went in and fixed one of the references, which was not active. Lary Walker is a hugely important scientist in the field of Alzheimer's disease, being the first to show how pathology spreads (along with his colleague, Matt Jucker).BrainMan2017 (talk) 03:17, 17 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hi Lance,

Thanks for your recent review of my article. I'm still a newbie and I was about to ask my teacher for help regarding whether to edit the sandbox or the article directly. Your comment helped a lot. Thanks Dazen31415 (talk) 00:04, 17 June 2020 (UTC) 17/06/2020Reply

No problem Dazen31415, glad to be of help. On the wiki we generally directly edit the articles so content can be tracked via revision history. Let me know if anything else comes up! -Liance^{talk/contribs} 00:46, 17 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hello Liance,

There is a problem in the page (Kingdom of Jeypore). For the past three months one user is constantly deleting and editing our work. In the beginning he deleted most of the research saying that the evidence is from sources of British Raj. Due to the neglect this area is facing from the Indian and state government since 1947, there are not enough books written on the history of the dynasty but still we tried our best and provided a lot of modern and relevant references to support our article.

However the last two paragraphs under post titlular ruler has one reference from the Times of India newspaper that mentions the coronation of the new titular king of the dynasty. But this user called Rexxx deletes it every time saying it’s unreliable. How is a big sensational news of this kind can be considered unreliable. We have many newspapers mentioning the event and we are ready to provide to whomsoever if required. But pleas please ask this man to stop editing because he is creating a bit unhealthy atmosphere and not letting us concentrate on making this article better. Mihirbhoj (talk) 03:08, 17 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Please help to check it, I have removed all the possible primary source. Abbas Kwarbai (talk) 13:08, 18 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Thank you for using your time to review the Generation C entry. I have added more references to show the notability. It is true that being something so new, the references are still not thousands but you can see that the term is being used worldwide and also in some important sites. — Preceding unsigned comment added by GeneralComment (talk • contribs) 11:21, 19 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

The submission has reached 24 hours without any response. Is it clearly shows that the article is now accepted to go for reviewing? Please I will like to have positive response from you sir Abbas Kwarbai (talk) 15:46, 19 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hi Liance, thank you for accepting my article on Scantrust, which is now in Mainspace. I see however at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:NewPagesFeed that "the page is still unreviewed", and so I am not not clear on what will happen next, if anything. I was wondering if it is usual for an accepted article to be unreviewed. Does this this mean that other reviewers will review it in the near future? Many thanks, Factfox (talk) 12:29, 22 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hi Liance, I saw you are active in the cryptocurrency wikiproject. Would you care to weigh in at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Bitcoin_Improvement_Proposal? --187.178.163.96 (talk) 21:09, 28 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hey Liance!

I have resubmitted the wiki page on BCB Blockchin as per your comments. I have added in more credible links and supporting evidences. Please do take a look at your convienient time and let me know if any further changes needed. Looking forward to hearing from you very soon. Thank you

link: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:BCB_Blockchain_(Blockchain_Protocol)&action=edit&oldid=965072351 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nisha9796 (talk • contribs) 04:31, 21 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hi Liance!

I have redone the topic ( K C Pandey ) I had tried during my first submission (which was refused). I did a thorough study for AFC as per Wikipedia & about the topic & worked on it! I don't want this time time to fail , so I humbly request to give a quick look at my creation & let me know the flaws if any before final review to publish. I understand about the time constraint so I'm asking for just an overview. If done I'll be able to make the changes as advised! I'll be highly thankful . Though being my 1st AFC I'll keep updating on the subject as I get to know more of it. I think I'm clear with my words.

Warm Regds, Shekhar in (talk) 01:09, 5 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for moving my draft article. Still finding my feet! Reader265 (talk) 09:54, 23 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hi there, I'm MDanielsBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Lito Adiwang, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. MDanielsBot (talk) 01:22, 7 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

My article about emteria.OS is rejected because of not enough supporting references, and I added new references and resubmitted it. While I check with other similar OS pages, my references looks the same supporting and valid. Would you help me about which parts do not have enough references in order to change or delete them from my article?