Line 224:
:Hi I added a source that is completely about her in the reception section. I also added more secondary sources in addition to the primary source (the book) in the storyline section. [[User:Lisha2037|Lisha2037]] ([[User talk:Lisha2037#top|talk]]) 07:01, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
== Attack content, not contributors ==
{{uw-icon1}} Hi, I'm [[User:RoxySaunders|RoxySaunders]]. Your remarks to DanielRigal in [[Special:Diff/1239435873|your edit summary]] were not acceptable; (see {{slink|Wikipedia:No_personal_attacks#What_is_considered_to_be_a_personal_attack?}} and [[WP:Casting aspersions]]). Please aim to write [[WP:edit summaries|edit summaries]] which focus on the content itself, instead of accusing editors of bias. Regards, –[[User:RoxySaunders|RoxySaunders 🏳️⚧️]] ([[User talk:RoxySaunders|💬]] • [[Special:Contributions/RoxySaunders|📝]]) 15:49, 9 August 2024 (UTC)
:This article IS biased. It used to have language like anti-trans and one of the sources I replaced was because the title referred to Gaines as anti-trans. I may come off as a newbie on Wikipedia but I do come from a professional journalism background as both a writer and editor. It frustrates me that the editors who are reviewing this article want to put in their personal opinions on this matter into the article. [[User:Lisha2037|Lisha2037]] ([[User talk:Lisha2037#top|talk]]) 17:35, 9 August 2024 (UTC)
:Thank you for all the sources. Here’s one for you [[Wikipedia:Tendentious editing]]. [[User:Lisha2037|Lisha2037]] ([[User talk:Lisha2037#top|talk]]) 19:06, 9 August 2024 (UTC)
|