User talk:Lisha2037 - Wikipedia
1 person in discussion
Hello, I'm Andrewrp. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Religion in the United Kingdom— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. AndrewrpTally-ho! 01:07, 13 July 2015 (UTC)Reply
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Leonardo DiCaprio, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Elle. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 17:59, 2 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Susanne Craig, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 01:40, 4 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Matt Bomer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Oppenheim.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:56, 9 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Timothée Chalamet, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 00:04, 14 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
Ritu Khullar, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Hello, Lisha2037! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ~Liancetalk 00:00, 28 May 2024 (UTC)Reply |
Nicholas Devlin, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Thanks for your contributions to Kathleen Roussel. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources and it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. C F A 💬 21:52, 19 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for your contributions to Queen Rhaenyra Targaryen. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. CycloneYoris talk! 01:10, 18 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rhaenyra Targaryen, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fire & Blood.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:28, 18 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for your contributions to Rhaenyra Targaryen (v.2). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and Simnilar, declined draft exists at Draft:Rhaenyra Targaryen. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. — TAnthonyTalk 17:01, 19 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
Hi, you seem to have submitted two drafts on the same subject, Draft:Rhaenyra Targaryen and Draft:Rhaenyra Targaryen (v.2). I'm not sure why you would do that, but we can only publish one or the other, which means that we can only really review one or the other. Which one would you like us to review? Thanks, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:46, 20 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
- Hello. What do you mean independant notability? Do you live under a rock. House of the Dragon is the biggest English language tv show on earth and this is an article about the main character. I can prune the writing but as someone who has been an editor at newspapers and other journals, if not Wikipedia yet, I can tell you these are sufficient resources. I have seen stub articles with less resources get approved. How can I get a different editor? Lisha2037 (talk) 19:39, 23 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CFA was:
You did not address the issues from the last decline. Multiple paragraphs are still unsourced, and parts of this are copied from various other articles without attribution. Please read WP:CWW and add attribution appropriately. Thank you.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rhaenyra Targaryen and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of websites). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
The comment the reviewer left was:
The sources shouldn't be inherited from the films. Are there sources that reviews the characters role? Is there any film review that it dominated?; those are the things we are looking for, and not just being mentioned in a film review
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rhaenyra Targaryen and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
- Hi I added a source that is completely about her in the reception section. I also added more secondary sources in addition to the primary source (the book) in the storyline section. Lisha2037 (talk) 07:01, 30 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
Hi, I'm RoxySaunders. Your remarks to DanielRigal in your edit summary were not acceptable; (see Wikipedia:No personal attacks § What is considered to be a personal attack? and WP:Casting aspersions). Please aim to write edit summaries which focus on the content itself, instead of accusing editors of bias. Regards, –RoxySaunders 🏳️⚧️ (💬 • 📝) 15:49, 9 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
- This article IS biased. It used to have language like anti-trans and one of the sources I replaced was because the title referred to Gaines as anti-trans. I may come off as a newbie on Wikipedia but I do come from a professional journalism background as both a writer and editor. It frustrates me that the editors who are reviewing this article want to put in their personal opinions on this matter into the article. Lisha2037 (talk) 17:35, 9 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
- Thank you for all the sources. Here’s one for you Wikipedia:Tendentious editing. Lisha2037 (talk) 19:06, 9 August 2024 (UTC)Reply