User talk:Mar4d: Difference between revisions - Wikipedia

Line 126:

{{od}} {{tps}} I have found some evidence which shows that {{u|AHLM13}} and {{u|Undertrialryryr}} could be innocent '''only for their latest misdeeds'''. I am not asking for their unblock as both are bad faith editors, but some people are taking advantage of their murky past. I don't like both of them but comparing the previous edits of AHLM13 and ZORDANLIGHTER; they can't make such extremely offensive comments about Babitaarora and Anna Frodesiak. The above comment is made by AHLM13 as the standard of English proves it. Anyone interested.? <span style="border:1.5px solid lime;padding:1.5px;">[[User:CosmicEmperor|<font style="color:#ffffff;background:red;">C E</font>]] ([[User talk:CosmicEmperor#top|talk]])</span> 09:12, 17 May 2015 (UTC)

:: Yes, the above IP is AHLM. But I can say with a high level of accuracy that the other troll IPs/sock accounts are not. I would agree that AHLM is not the perfect example of a good editor and may have attitude issues. But that is something that could also improve over time. He needs to be instructed and guided firmly. There's a high possibility that his account is compromised and he's been shut out for the wrong reason (not that it excuses his other actions). I have been long enough on Wikipedia to see newby editors maturing over time and later becoming very constructive (and even an asset) to Wikipedia. That is why I would be willing to lend some good faith to AHLM. But before that, AHLM ''has to'' 1) sort out the behaviour issues; and 2) use the correct procedure and that is already specified. He also needs to sort out the security-related issues with his account and computer if someone else is messing around. '''[[User:Mar4d|<font color="green">Mar4d</font>]]''' ([[User talk:Mar4d|<font color="green">talk</font>]]) 09:33, 17 May 2015 (UTC)