User talk:Newsroom hierarchies: Difference between revisions - Wikipedia

Article Images

(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)

Line 27:

== Sigh ==

[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents Drama]. Can I get a sanity check (candidly) from you about what I've been doing with the campaign article? [[User:tqbf|<~~font~~span ~~color~~style="color:black"; ~~face="~~font-family:courier;">--- tqbf</~~font~~span>]] 01:59, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

:I ended up commenting on DC, which may or may not have been a good idea since it was "your" ANI. I think we share pretty much the same view of that article--it's way too long, and the pro-Paul editors are often a little too eager to insert what we consider fluff and trivial items. That bias stated, I haven't seen you commit any obvious breaches of WP policy or norms. Where you think you have, you've been quick to take it to the other editors' talk pages. You're pretty frank at times, but you haven't made personal attacks or been inappropriate. Hell, you and Terjen were even cracking Ron Paul jokes with each other (maybe that means you both need a break, but I'm not going to judge...). Hardly the actions of a "POV warrior," I'd think. --[[User:Newsroom hierarchies|Newsroom hierarchies]] ([[User talk:Newsroom hierarchies#top|talk]]) 02:55, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

:: Thanks, I appreciate the feedback. Have a good weekend! [[User:tqbf|<~~font~~span ~~color~~style="color:black"; ~~face="~~font-family:courier;">--- tqbf</~~font~~span>]] 02:58, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

== Debate coverage ==

Line 39:

When you cut away the crap, most of these debate sections had virtually nothing to say about the debates, except that Paul was (or wasn't) there, and that he did (or, more likely, didn't) appear on TV afterwards.

[[User:tqbf|<~~font~~span ~~color~~style="color:black"; ~~face="~~font-family:courier;">--- tqbf</~~font~~span>]] 22:58, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

:I've been following the changes throughout the day--looks good to me. I did revert Goon Noot's reversion of you just now, so you might want to check to see that that didn't mess anything up. --[[User:Newsroom hierarchies|Newsroom hierarchies]] ([[User talk:Newsroom hierarchies#top|talk]]) 23:04, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

Line 94:

[[Culture]] has been nominated for a [[Wikipedia:Good article reassessment|good article reassessment]]. Articles are typically reviewed for one week. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to [[Wikipedia:What is a good article?|good article quality]]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status will be removed from the article. Reviewers' concerns are [[Talk:Culture{{#if:1|/GA1}}|here]].

--[[User:AlotToLearn|AlotToLearn]] ([[User talk:AlotToLearn|talk]]) 00:56, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

== Help! ==

beacuse too many cooks spoil the broth, the [[Culture]] article has been a disaster. And there were lots of valid criticisms on the talk page, and many sometimes ill-informed suggestions. I just did a major overhaul and would appreciate your checking it out. I hope you will not find cause to revert my changes. I hope you will see ways to improve them. My one request: just do not add missing information without thinking of the overall organization of the thing (otherwise, it will soon turn chaotic again) ... that is, if you think I did a poor job of reorganizing it, I hope we can discuss it and work out a better organization. Thanks, [[User:Slrubenstein|Slrubenstein]] | [[User talk:Slrubenstein|Talk]] 23:05, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

== [[WP:ACE2015|ArbCom elections are now open!]] ==

Hi,<br>

You appear to be eligible to vote in the current [[WP:ACE2015|Arbitration Committee election]]. The [[WP:ARBCOM|Arbitration Committee]] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia [[WP:RFAR|arbitration process]]. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose [[WP:BAN|site bans]], [[WP:TBAN|topic bans]], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The [[WP:ARBPOL|arbitration policy]] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to [[WP:ACE2015/C|review the candidates' statements]] and submit your choices on [[Special:SecurePoll/vote/398|the voting page]]. For the Election committee, [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 13:39, 24 November 2015 (UTC)