User talk:PBS/Archive 17: Difference between revisions - Wikipedia

Line 979:

::::::::Stop your [[Battleground]] antics and allow this unbiased admin to objectively assess your conduct today. I have left all the "glory" of editing that article to you and your email pal long ago. Also, changing your edit after I had responded as you have done more than once, and like you did now [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:PBS&diff=632502487&oldid=632502006] is inconsistent with policy. This is a verifiable fact. Don't label it an attack. Finally, you and your email pal should read [[WP:ADMINSHOP]] as it is inconsistent with policy, and you should not bite a [[WP:NEWCOMER]] just because they made an observation of your conduct. Have a good night and enjoy life. [[User:Worldedixor|Worldedixor]] ([[User talk:Worldedixor|talk]]) 02:07, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

{{edit conflict}}[[Image:Graham's_Hierarchy_of_Disagreement-en.svg|thumb|375px|right|Stay in the top three sections of this pyramid.]] Yikes! I now know how my mother felt when she got mad at me and my sister fighting. Sadly, I've seem the progression of conflict between these two editors and P123ct1 has been always been patient and civil and does not deserve these attacks. As you can see in the RFC/U, WE has responds to everything in the lower section of the pyramid, just stopping short of outright name-calling. ~[[User:Technophant|Technophant]] <small>([[User talk:Technophant|talk]])</small> 02:50, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

:::::::::[[User:Technophant|Technophant]] is not an unbiased "peacemaker" in this. He is [[User:P123ct1|P123ct1]]'s email pal. As I stated above, this is always the case. They come as a "tag team" and a lynch mob to drag me to their [[WP:BATTLEGROUND]] rather than communicate as individual editors. This is why I have decided to walk away from any and all edit conflict to avoid a potential [[WP:EW]] with them not even revert their edits even though they always confront my "minimal" number of well sourced edits. It is just not worth it. I don't have the time to list all incidents of his conduct that is inconsistent with policy, but I don't need to. This unbiased admin, PBS, has seen through the cloud screens, and has stated facts about the "unjustified" RFC for which, in my opinion, Technophant has canvassed in bad faith and in sheer violation of policy [[WP:CANVASS]]. Also, his larger than life diagram here and accusations, to me, sound like a personal attack. I did not call him or P123ct1 names. Enough [[WP:REHASH]] and vindictiveness already. I have shown a lot of restraint today adhering to policy. They should not be allowed to push me. [[User:Worldedixor|Worldedixor]] ([[User talk:Worldedixor|talk]]) 03:01, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

== Is this OK? ==