User talk:Peasantwarrior - Wikipedia

Please note Im a fag..... i also hate black people (niggas) respond here only to questions raised here. Thanks.

Wow, vandalized 17+1 ([1],[2],[3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18]) times already... I never thought I'd become this popular.

No, it wasn't a test. Sorry if there's been any kind of misunderstanding, but I believe a semi-conclusive list of people who have died is a valuable resource for quicker browsing, and expedites looking up dead celebrities. I do a lot of research involving death and celebrity death and I'm sure I'm not alone (wikipedia has plenty of niche places), and I need quick access to a list such as this.InterDinghy (talk) 11:35, 26 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

I've answered on the article talk page. Thank you. Peasantwarrior (talk) 11:39, 26 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for that, after a bit of a think your reasoning has convinced me. Lankiveil (talk) 13:33, 28 December 2007 (UTC).Reply

Regarding SAI - Small Arms Industries ApS ... what is wrong ? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lapsai (talk • contribs) 13:35, 28 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

I've answered you on your talk page.

However, the article seems to have been already deleted, meaning an administrator concluded it was advertising. Peasantwarrior (talk) 13:38, 28 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Hello,

Sorry, i just read the article, and yes. He (according to the article) was born 300 years ago. I will remove the Speedy Delete tag, and replace it with an

tag.

Sydney Know It Alltalk 14:24, 28 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

I have removed your tag from the article as directing an Emmy-award winning programme is a claim of notability. However, it appears to be a hoax, as Google is showing me nothing, so I have PRODed the article instead. J Milburn (talk) 18:47, 28 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Oh yes definitely. I came across that article as-well, though I found that you got to it before me. I'm not too sure on wikipedia's policies against vanity, thats why i used the db|Vanity tag, as the article demonstrated explicit vanity. What do you think? Sydney Know It Alltalk 13:13, 29 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

        Great, ill be watching! Sydney Know It Alltalk 13:27, 29 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

"This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing."

So creating a Wikipedia page for an actress is vandalism now is it? Please tell me what is wrong with my page.

Katherine Elizabeth Hayes is an Australian actress, sister to Home and Away star Christie Ayrna-Lynne Hayes, who played Kirsty Sutherland.

If you actually took the time to READ Katherine's page instead of just nazi-ing and deleting it because you've never heard of her, you would see.

This is her IMDB profile. http://imdb.com/name/nm1843356/ Not just anyone can get an IMDB profile. I'm sure you know that. Take a look at it, and you'll see she IS an actress.

Take the time to read what I spent a long time writing, and you'll see why she is notable.

Other actresses have Wikipedia pages.

Why should it be any different for her? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kara42 (talk • contribs) 16:38, 30 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Hi. I'm sure she is an actress. She's just not notable. I (along with some other people) have answered on Talk:Katherine_Hayes. Also, about IMDB profiles - please read Wikipedia:Notability_(people), note 5. IMDB is not considered credible. About vandalism, creating an article is not (usually) considered a vandalism, other things you did (like vandalizing its talk page by copy pasting large amounts of nonsense) is. Thanks. Peasantwarrior (talk) 16:46, 30 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

K. Thanks for actually replying. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kara42 (talk • contribs) 16:53, 30 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Do not delete the stick online post. I am having the stick online community add more information and helpfull guides. I am not promoting a product or service because the game is free and there are no ads. Please reconsider Dasporkman1 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dasporkman1 (talk • contribs) 20:32, 30 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

How can you call this a disruptive edit:

Walter Wakeman is a lovely young man of some 20 summers. He enjoys video games, long walks on the beach, skipping stones, and Tim and Helen, among other things. But to truly understand the importance of Walter Wakeman, we must start from the beginning.

It is not only informative, but very well written. I also feel that Walter is a very important person, despite your obvious disagreement. He was diagnosed with cancer two years ago, and his favorite site on all the internet is Wikipedia. I was just hoping to suprise him with his very own article, but you ruined it. I hope you're happy.

Good day, Happytummy —Preceding unsigned comment added by Happytummy (talk • contribs) 07:43, 31 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Hi. I'm very sorry for your friend - nobody should go through the pain and suffering he is going through. That said, I stand by my decision. Let me be perfectly honest with you: Many people have cancer and although I know that doesn't make your friend any less special and I symphatize with his (and your) pain, that doesn't make him notable. If you wanted to surprise him, there are a lot of nice (allowed) things you can do for him: make him a Youtube video, for example. I'm sure he'll be delighted and you'll show how much he means to you. About disruptive edits, you know what you wrote in your second "article". That's considered disruptive and inappropriate. Please, don't do it again. Now, I hope you and especially your friend have a happy life. May he get well soon, I wish him all the best. Thanks. Peasantwarrior (talk) 08:30, 31 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

If you remember my article entitled, Otaka's Scoop, then you will probably remember the article being deleted twice. It may have been you that said this, but whoever was responsible for its second deletion needs to read this. The last talk message you put on Otaka's Scoop said that the article was classified as an advertisement. I am not arguing the faact that it was indeed an advertisement, though in my defense, I must note the huge hole in this reason for deletion. If you delete every advertisement that comes along, then why do I still see Harry Potter, Blogger, Blender, and many other advertisement articles on Wikipedia? Allow me to put the small article that I have tried to put on twice on to Wikipedia, as it could introduce many to the wonderful world of reading, and give a glimpse into the writing style of a future author. Please respond on my talk page. (Artemis Potter (talk) 23:05, 31 December 2007 (UTC))Reply

I removed prod tag and sent to AfD--CastAStone/^/(talk) 07:26, 1 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Please fill free to courtesy blank defamatory content when you apply WP:CSD#G10 tags. Cheers, Dlohcierekim 20:24, 2 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

OK, thanks for reminding me. (Sorry for not responding on your talk page, seems irrelevant enough (not your talk page... you know what I mean :)) Peasantwarrior (talk) 20:26, 2 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Although the subject of the article may not remove a csd tag and doing so multiple times is disruptive, please do not continue to replace it if removed. Whether or not that is an exemption to the 3RR is up in the air. The best thing to do is find an online admin and let them know. It beats having to revert over the tag itself. Alternatively, you may nominate it for AfD in twinkle and note in the nomination that the CSD tag has been removed by the author and you want it A7'd. Hope that helps! Protonk (talk) 23:01, 2 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Thanks. It's been deleted anyway in the meantime, so it doesn't matter now, does it? Peasantwarrior (talk) 07:05, 3 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

I deleted it. I was just letting you know for future reference. Protonk (talk) 16:59, 3 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

But I am just putting togeth the story of Foxys dream - can you gime me some more time to complete? Fish of Destiny (talk) 14:08, 3 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Maybe you haven't seen this page: Wikipedia:NOT. It, among other things, states that "Wikipedia is not a publisher of original thought". Now, if this dream you speak of is some kind of a book or a movie, that's fine. But if it's just a dream that you or your friend or whoever had, it won't be able to be on Wikipedia. Thanks. Peasantwarrior (talk) 14:13, 3 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Why did you delete Alexandre Evans? He is a real person and is very famous on the internet and has released a cd. Some people would like to know more about him!!!

I did not delete anything... I don't have the power to delete it, an admin must do it. As I can see, it hasn't been deleted. Yet. However, it is my point of view that it should be deleted soon. Please, see WP:CSD, part A7. Simply put, there is no claim of notability enough to earn an article here. Peasantwarrior (talk) 14:36, 3 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

do you even know who he is?!? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Twilightgirl94 (talk • contribs) 14:39, 3 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

No, I don't. Do you know who Propast d.o.o. is, to be brutal? (They're probably not notable enough to get an article on Wikipedia.) Peasantwarrior (talk) 14:41, 3 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

a lot of people know who alex is. go look at www.alexevans.net or type in his name on polyvore.

Again, having a webpage is not a sign of notability. To further my example even more, you can take a look at Propast d.o.o.'s blog or myspace. That doesn't make them notable. Peasantwarrior (talk) 14:47, 3 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

but why cant he have a article? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Twilightgirl94 (talk • contribs) 14:50, 3 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Because, in my view (and it really is only my view - admin(s) get the final word), he really isn't notable enough. I've given you an example above. Do you know how many bands/singers/artists exist on this planet. Surely not all of them require an article. Please, see Wikipedia:Notability (music) and Wikipedia:Notability (people) for more explanations. Peasantwarrior (talk) 14:55, 3 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

well tell me why there is an article about alex evans an austrailian rugby coach? There are people on this site that nobody has and never will know who they are or even care. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Twilightgirl94 (talk • contribs) 14:12, 4 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

The man was, as I understand, a coach for a large rugby team and also for Welsh national team. Even for a person with an obvious lack of sports knowledge like me, that makes him notable. I'm almost certain that people in Cardiff wouldn't agree with "nobody has and never will know who they are or even care". :) Also, it appears you are using WP:Other stuff exists argument. This has generally proven to be a bad argument. Peasantwarrior (talk) 14:16, 4 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

what would you do if i make an article on super satellite? oh and why does miley cyrus have an article? she hasnt really done anything notable. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Twilightgirl94 (talk • contribs) 22:29, 4 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

i think you'll find this article now contains no copyrighted material. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Skills_Academy —Preceding unsigned comment added by Alpha-ZX (talk • contribs) 17:59, 3 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

That is not true. It is still compiled from [19] and [20], even though you have randomly changed a very small amount of words, not changing the form of the text. Peasantwarrior (talk) 18:13, 3 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

ok, so what can i do to keep this article up and avoid breaching copyright infringement? this article is relevant to an important uk government initiative. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Alpha-ZX (talk • contribs) 18:29, 3 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

This will probably seem like a brutal or a sarcastic thing to say, but... writing it yourself? Peasantwarrior (talk) 18:53, 3 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

if i cant copy writing from a website, and i cant reword it myself, what am i supposed to do? Ive rewritten the info into different wording.Alpha-ZX (talk) 19:20, 3 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Once again, try writing it yourself. You may certainly use these pages as a reference (I'd suggest having multiple references, though), but you can't just change a few random words and think you're not in violation of copyright. But the point is in writing it in your own words. Peasantwarrior (talk) 19:23, 3 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

well ive update it and i think the article can no longer be accused of infringing copyright laws.Alpha-ZX (talk) 19:41, 3 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

OK, let's see what I'll do now. I'll try to find a online admin and direct him to this page and let him decide... I, and my opinion has no weight, am much more satisfied with this article than the copy-pasted text it was. Peasantwarrior (talk) 19:43, 3 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

OK, thats good to know, cheers.Alpha-ZX (talk) 19:45, 3 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

As a neutral third party, if you let me, I could make it totally neutral and 'copyright-free'. NCurse _work 20:22, 3 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Weighing in here. I deleted the article because it still appeared (to me) to be a copyright violation. I wouldn't be comfortable userfying it for further work because of the copyright issues. I think starting from scratch would be the best bet.--Fabrictramp | talk to me 00:33, 4 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hey! I'm new to wikipedia authoring and I'm not completely clear on why the page has been marked for speedy deletion. I know in the past it's been vandalized and had terrible creations but I feel that the article I wrote (while not perfect by any means) is legit. If it's notoriety, can I get some hit numbers from the website to prove its relevance? That it's been created 3 times (at least twice legitimately) might prove that as well.

Like I said, I'm new and I'm looking for guidance so please help me understand why it's being deleted and how (if there is a way) I can create the page without it being marked for speedy deletion.

Thanks for your time. OlYeller21 (talk) 20:20, 3 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Also, I put up a contest for speedy deletion. I tried to put the reasoning on the talk page but it's locked. I put it on the main page because I didn't know what else to do. :-/ OlYeller21 (talk) 20:28, 3 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Just a short response. The page you tried to create speaks of a non-notable blog (there really is no claim of notability whatsoever). You tried to reason using the argument that eBay has an article. Yes, it does. I have two things to say to that - the first is eBay is much more notable, enough to warrant an article in an encyclopedia. The second is, you are trying to use WP:Other stuff exists. This has proven to be a bad argument. Now, I suggest you stop writing articles about that blog since it will be speedy deleted again. When and if it becomes notable, I assure you, somebody else will write an article about it. If you don't stop introducing inappropriate articles, you might find yourself banned. Peasantwarrior (talk) 07:38, 4 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Peasantwarrior, I came to you in good faith and asked for your help. That was the first time I created the article about the blog. I said I didn't understand the reasoning and asked for help. I did have a reference of notoriety which I'm guessing you missed by accident. After talking with an administrator, he cleared up the Wiki's definition of notable which I now fully understand. I appreciate your getting back to me and looking out for Wikipedia but you might want to read Wikipedia:Assume_good_faith#Good_faith_and_newcomers before responding again in such a threatening manner. I fully understand that I might be misunderstanding your tone but it might be something to keep an eye on when helping newbies like myself. Thanks again for your help and time. OlYeller21 (talk) 16:49, 4 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Dude, I respect you and I do think you're misunderstanding me. Maybe I'm too brutal - I really have nothing against you and didn't mean to be unpolite. However, I do believe that honesty is the best policy and, while maybe I was too direct, I tried to make my position as clear as possible. Anyway, I try to assume good faith regardless of anybody's "newbiness". Peasantwarrior (talk) 17:02, 4 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

I wasn't experimenting, nor testing. I was trying to add an item to the to-do list on the discussion page, but the template doesn't seem to be working (or there is some conflict). I refer you to my comment on the discussion page. Perhaps you have some help to offer?
Thanks. Centrepull (talk) 08:26, 4 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

I've removed the speedy delete template from Metroid (series)/to do. To back Centrepull up here, to-do lists are a common feature on Wikipedia. --JD554 (talk) 08:32, 4 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

OK, sorry, I didn't understand what you were trying to do. Sorry once again. Peasantwarrior (talk) 08:36, 4 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

No problem. There is platform info in the text, but I've added the basic info to the infobox. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Centrepull (talk • contribs) 08:38, 4 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Where a page about a person is as rude as Jeff Shedosky just now, better than {{db-person}} is to tag it {{db-attack}} (or {{db-atk}} to save keystrokes) and also replace the whole article with the word "blanked." {{db-atk}} gives a suitably fierce warning to put on the attacker's page, and probably helps get it deleted sooner; and blanking the article denies him the satisfaction of showing it to his friends before it gets deleted. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 15:17, 4 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hey. Yeah, I do it on occasions when I see it, but I must have missed it this time. I swear I do it in other instances. Thanks for reminding me. Peasantwarrior (talk) 17:02, 4 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

I noticed that I left the sandbox comments on my page after testing. I removed the comments, so what else needs to be done to the article so that it won't be deleted.

Nothing... I removed the deletion notice after noticing that this was the only problem with the article. Sorry about that - it was my fault. Peasantwarrior (talk) 15:18, 4 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

...making nonsense articles?!?!? Kidding, of course. Thanks for the help. :) --PMDrive1061 (talk) 18:17, 4 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Just so you know, anyone other than the author can decline a speedy deletion. Replacing it after it's been declined is consider disruptive. If you still feel it doesn't belong, take it to WP:AFD I'll take a look at the other issues you mentioned. Toddst1 (talk) 19:38, 4 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Yeah, I know. :) I've answered on your talk page. Peasantwarrior (talk) 19:47, 4 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Just received an email from Permissions Wikipedia in reference to my copyright references to the 330th Bombardment Group. I received permission to use it as set forth in free license agreement. Thank you for mediating between an overzealous moderator and my inexperienced self.B29bomber (talk) 21:29, 4 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hi Peasantwarrior! I just wanted to inform you that I removed the speedy deletion tag you placed on Lemogfog- because: the page is not nonsese, you can understand it, even if it's untrue If you have any questions or comments, please do not hesitate to contact me. Kingpin¹³ (talk) 07:36, 15 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Yup, I agree that it's a vandalism/hoax page. Anway, keep up your help tagging, and thanks for that vandal revert :) - Kingpin¹³ (talk) 07:41, 15 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Just adding im very sorry my daughter just slipped on here. she does have a creative mind i mean seriously lemogfog!!! that is very silly. Please accept my apologys.

Dear Peasantwarrior, Hello i am Marie Anne Bartswog. I am here now to ask you why you are trying to remove my site. i am 97 years old and i am very creative. i have storys to tell about my great grandmother such as lemogfog. I have read it in the great myth book by ann cuchinghulie too. Please if u have issues with myths, delete the dragon site. It may be untrue to you but means alot to me. Myths are about creativness. we would of never been here unless for our ancestors. so please help me and keep my site. i will be adding more info soon.

                                            Sincerely,Marie Ann Bartswog  —Preceding unsigned comment added by AdamlambertX0 (talk • contribs) 07:59, 15 July 2009 (UTC)Reply 

Lemogfog Shall Stay Dear Peasantwarrior,Hello i am Marie Anne Bartswog. I am here now to ask you why you are trying to remove my site. i am 97 years old and i am very creative. i have storys to tell about my great grandmother such as lemogfog. I have read it in the great myth book by ann cuchinghulie too. Please if u have issues with myths, delete the dragon site. It may be untrue to you but means alot to me. Myths are about creativness. we would of never been here unless for our ancestors. so please help me and keep my site. i will be adding more info soon. Sincerely,Marie Ann Bartswog —Preceding unsigned comment added by AdamlambertX0 (talk • contribs) 08:02, 15 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Sorry, Wikipedia is not a place for (non-notable) myths and stories. The page will get deleted - it simply isn't suitable for encyclopedia. May I suggest writing it on some other sites which promote this kind of creativity. There really isn't anything bad in creative writing of fiction, it just isn't acceptable here because that isn't what Wikipedia is all about. Peasantwarrior (talk) 08:08, 15 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hello Peasantwarrior, and thanks for your work patrolling new changes. I am just informing you that I declined the speedy deletion of Social maven - a page you tagged - because: clearly has context. Please review the criteria for speedy deletion before tagging further pages. If you have any questions or problems, please let me know. SoWhy 09:30, 15 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Sorry, my mistake. I tagged the page because it was simply a copy first sentence of maven with some (to me) unknown and unsourced example after it. Thanks for redirecting it where it belongs. Peasantwarrior (talk) 09:35, 15 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

No problem. In future, you might want to consider such actions yourself instead of requesting speedy deletion. Regards SoWhy 09:38, 15 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hello Peasantwarrior. May I ask you, why you consider this as a spam ? It seems to be an important medical equipment and I can't find any advertisement or self-promotion in that article. I'll decline the speedy tag - take it to AfD, if you disagree. --Vejvančický (talk) 12:12, 15 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

OK, it's your call. In my mind, the title itself is an advertisement since there are many coagulation analyzers in the world and I this is just one product. It also contains a number of weasel words. But, as I say, I'm not an expert on the subject and it's your call. Peasantwarrior (talk) 12:16, 15 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

I just want to note (not that it must mean much, but I merely noticed it) the article has already been deleted as an advertisment two days ago. I don't know what state it was in, but it does raise suspicions about a marketing effort. Peasantwarrior (talk) 12:20, 15 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Yes, I've noted that, but I didn't read the first version. I think it is better to give the author a chance and maybe some advice in this case. Btw, look at the Talk:Sonoclot. The user is new and he/she apparently has no clue how wikipedia works. It's better to welcome and help him. Have a good day. --Vejvančický (talk) 12:30, 15 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

OK, let's wait and see. Peasantwarrior (talk) 12:35, 15 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Why do You keep defeating me to csding pages ?--Notedgrant (talk) 10:54, 31 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Well, seems I'm faster than you... More luck next time. :P :D Peasantwarrior (talk) 10:56, 31 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

YEAH while you were busy responding I csded some articles ;) Thanks and have a gr8 day --Notedgrant (talk) 15:38, 31 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

"Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Kurdon.com, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Wikipedia:Your first article. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Peasantwarrior (talk) 13:54, 31 August 2009 (UTC)"

Kurdon.com is not in violation of Wikipedia's policy, since I believe it to be the equivalent to e.g. Craigslist or Findsyou.com. So for you to be consequent, you will either allow Kurdon.com, or delete the pages for Craigslist or Findsyou.com.

Furthermore, I would appreciate it if you could direct me to the relevant section in Wikipedias policies, to which you are referring. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Crissan (talk • contribs) 14:00, 31 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

I've answered on the talk page of the article in question. Peasantwarrior (talk) 14:03, 31 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

A CSD notice was put up here by Drmies, as an obvious reminder what happens when two New Page patrollers have only one spammer to take care of :) Peasantwarrior (talk) 18:55, 31 August 2009 (UTC)Reply