User talk:Professor Guru: Difference between revisions - Wikipedia


Article Images

Content deleted Content added

Line 28:

I will add it

*No, don't do that. We need printed, secondary sources. [[User:Drmies|Drmies]] ([[User talk:Drmies|talk]]) 17:48, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

**Uhm... ▼

----

▲Uhm...

Did you look at the references? I gave 6 printed different secondary sources in Footnote 9, 13, 16, 17, 19 and 20.

:***Just so you're aware, [[Wikipedia:DAILYEXPRESS|the Daily Express]] and [[Wikipedia:DAILYMAIL|the Daily Mail]] are generally unreliable. Your contribution could get removed again on the basis that many of your sources are [[WP:RSP|unreliable]]. –[[User:Skywatcher68|Skywatcher68]] ([[User talk:Skywatcher68|talk]])

***No, I didn't, because I was looking at your "original video" of a Tweet. Also, please sign your name, and stick to convention for indenting posts on talk pages. Thanks. [[User:Drmies|Drmies]] ([[User talk:Drmies|talk]]) 01:24, 10 February 2022 (UTC)

--> Obviously... I do not believe that authentic and Federation of International Autosports confirmed (see reference from the FIA in the article) videos published in Mail Online and Express are "generally unreliable" sources (that's quite a sweeping statement, especially considering that good journalists with reliable sources work there and considering that BBC, The Independent and SkySports were made aware by Mail and Express about the video, the investigation and the statement by the FIA).