User talk:Rajan51: Difference between revisions - Wikipedia

Line 50:

I request you to review the page [[M.S. Dhoni: The Untold Story]] as a user named [[User:Josephlalrinhlua786|Josephlalrinhlua786]] is constantly adding unnecessary content from the web. Even after his edits being undone repeatedly by other users including myself, he continues to impose his version and ignores warnings and advices. Kindly look into the matter. ~~[[User:Rajan51|Rajan51]] ([[User talk:Rajan51#top|talk]]) 15:46, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

:In my defence, I did nothing wrong and did not violate any serious wikipedia policy. Yes you may have written a thousand articles and edited for centuries but we’re talking here purely in the context of the film and not your past experiences in Wikipedia with all due respect. It's been 4 days now that I've dedicated my entire life to the page, without which the "production" "release" and "reception" section would be dormant. I'm always open to help and advice, but not the types were people try to fit in their opinion and agenda so they could have a better outlook. I'm sorry but your name – “Raj” – might be an insinuation to me as it was for the Indians when the British Raj exploited them. I respect and admire your countless contributions to wikipedia for we all wikipedians have one common bond and that is to serve the masses by the informations we provide. A major revolution is eminent indeed. But what I find bugging about u is ur REF TAPSIM as I have told u before, you are so stuck with something so trivial as crore and rupees when they more or less connotes the same meaning and amount. Some Indian/Bollywood film articles have numbers in terms of crore and some million. So what? AS LONG AS THE FIGURE ARE ACCURATE it doesn't matter. The film opened to ₹66 crore (every source says ₹66 CRORE) and you go on writing in millions and say for the benefit of overseas readers. Well that's when the "US$" comes in right beside it. Chinese movie pages don't even do these they just write in their own currency. So why don't you see to that. The crore is for Indians and dollars for Caucasians. It's not like we can write for all 190+ currency. I don't see how we should write (Indian) million and (US) million. I mean people can get the wrong idea that we use millions instead of crore – you don't go to the back and ask for ₹10 million, you say ₹10 crore. This is an Indian film and that is how it should be written. I can't believe in discussing about something so trivial. Second, if some the contents I write are overly long or heftily covered than please I would bow down and thank you for the aid because I too make mistakes.. A lot of them! But the problem here with u is that instead of finding those flaws, you revert THE WHOLE THING! I mean c'mon read what's in the link and maybe truncate it, enrich it or do whatever. But you just remove the whole content which infuriates me (everyone would be). Correct others mistakes like that. By suddenly u become an extremist and go to the point where u want to block me and report me. What is this? Had Mahatma Gandhi used guns instead of non-violence then what would be the condition of India today. We won't even be having our national flag. Look [[Desmond Doss]] and how he saved 75 men lives without carrying a single gun when he went to war. PLEASE! Don't use these kinds of tactics. If I overly write something then text me and tell me and I'll see to it that I fix it. If I quote too much then inform me, I'll truncate it instead of deleting the whole information that took me many times to search (since I'm using from a phone). And then I have to write again; when u revert ur revert, you accuse me and condemn me and threaten me to get blocked. Like I've said to u personally, these kinds of moves will kill the incentives of other Wikipedians and especially the new ones. I'm glad that you brought this up with other veteran and venerated Wikipedians who I believe are not bias backed with reason. Yes, I promise i will see to it that I will delete the overly written informations section by section. But this needs time. I still need to write the review for the soundtrack and the songs (in short), have to take some more of the international review (I've taken just one from NY Times. Well, there was The Guardian’s review before but it got deleted by you-know-who). There's so much to do and scrutinizing the whole article will also take time. How can a single person do so much in a limited time with limited resources and on too authoritative rule? It's like a single mother with 10 babies -- newly born. I WANT AND NEED HELP to run this page, I can't do it alone but if it means deleting all the informations again (without trying to find meaning and importance from them) and quarreling over crore and million then I don't need one. I've said enough I think. Now it's up to u veterans to mark the flag and make the call. [[User:Josephlalrinhlua786|Josephlalrinhlua786]] ([[User talk:Josephlalrinhlua786|talk]]) 21:58, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

== Article deletion nominations ==