User talk:RenamedUser jaskldjslak901 - Wikipedia


9 people in discussion

Article Images

Retired

This user is no longer active on Wikipedia.

Hope you can quickly resolve the issues you have mentioned. Take care. The Rambling Man (talk) 21:02, 8 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

In no way did you fail, as you say on your user page. This is a far from ideal system, and in such systems many people with the best of intentions and best of behavior will find themselves facing a problem beyond their individual capacity to deal with. I am proud and grateful for the good that you did here, and I cannot see any reason for you not to be the same. I think we all wish you the best of luck with your health issues, which I know from experience can be devastating. John Carter (talk) 18:00, 9 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

I'm so sorry it's come to this, Secret. Get healthy, stay safe, and enjoy life away from all the drama. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 18:04, 9 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

  • Secret, I don't know what's happening in your world other than what I've read on your user pages, but I hope you get everything sorted. You have been a strong and valued contributor here on Wikipedia, and you will be missed. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 20:24, 9 December 2014 (UTC)Reply
Secret, I'm so very sorry to see you go. If there's anything I can do, please feel free to reach out to me. You know how to get me. Philippe Beaudette, Wikimedia Foundation (talk) 09:42, 10 December 2014 (UTC)Reply
  • We haven't met before, but I have seen you around. Today while typing a reply for someone else I found your signature blue signature turned red. Out of curiosity I came here and was shocked to know that another valued editor is leaving. I don't know what has happened but I can say, you will be really missed. Tare care. Jim Carter 10:45, 12 December 2014 (UTC)Reply
  • I guess I'm a bit late... I was looking at some old discussions, when I saw your sig with a red link. I became concerned when I hovered over it only to see "(page does not exist)". I understand your frustration, but it's just sad to see one of the best admins on Wikipedia retire. I hope you come back. Sincerely, --AmaryllisGardener talk 22:59, 16 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi Secret

Compliment of the season to you! I am here to build an encyclopedia and not for a war with any editor. You recently closed this AfD to delete. See this personal attack thereafter. Thanks! Wikic¤l¤gyt@lk to M£ 20:33, 18 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

(talk page stalker) @Wikicology: Unfortunately, Secret has recently retired. I wouldn't be expecting a reply from them if I were you. --AmaryllisGardener talk 20:41, 18 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

There is something we require you to explain. Please check your e-mail inbox and respond to the message sent to you by the committee before editing again. Thank you. For the Arbitration Committee, AGK [•] 10:25, 23 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

Best of luck with that. If you ever get a reply, please tell him he owes me an answer to my question as well. Thank you. Kiltpin (talk) 11:51, 23 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

I hope this finds you well, or indeed not at all because you are enjoying your editor retirement! It does not matter much at this point, because I understand you have left permanently, but I am required by convention to cross-post this motion to your talk page:

It has come to the committee's attention that on 09 December 2014, Secret (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) used the revision deletion (RevDel) function to hide the log entry for an indefinite block he originally carried out.

The revision deletion policy states that log redaction using RevDel is intended solely for material that is "grossly offensive" and content that is "grossly improper" (cf. WP:RVDL#Misuse). The committee has enquired with Secret as to why he deleted this log entry, and having considered his response remains unsatisfied that he had legitimate grounds to overrule policy in this way. We have decided not to give detail on the response he gave to the committee, because it relies fundamentally on information that is sensitive and not suitable for public release.

This instance of misjudgement is not isolated. The committee previously set aside concerns, without taking action, over an indefinite block one year ago by Secret. On that occasion, he improperly assigned to an indefinite block the special status of "arbitration enforcement block" (thereby preventing other administrators from reversing it under the normal processes). The committee set aside its concerns over that action because Secret retired shortly after the incident, but he regained the tools afterwards. We are therefore proceeding in this case on the assumption that he will at some point in the future request his tools be restored.

Administrators are expected to exercise care, good judgement, and to be accountable. For breaching these expectations without good reason, Secret's administrator permissions are removed with immediate effect. He may regain these permissions only by application at requests for adminship (RFA).

The motion was passed 11–0 announced today and should be implemented by the community at some point soon. I would also comment, for the record, that this motion was passed after we tried and failed to make contact with you on several occasions (see, for instance, the notice on your talk page above this section).

Please do not hesitate to contact the committee if you are indeed still active and have any questions about the re-RFA process.

For the Arbitration Committee,
AGK [•] 20:16, 24 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

  • Hi Secret, I am sorry to say that I have, in accordance with the above, removed your admin status. Regardless, I wish you the very best and hope that you have a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year. Best. Acalamari 20:33, 24 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

There is a discussion at WP:AN regarding your editing: Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard#Secret. Thanks. Go Phightins! 18:14, 26 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

Template:Blockeduser