User talk:Ret.Prof: Difference between revisions - Wikipedia

Line 56:

:You are out of line here - userspace is granted broad discretion. While these "drafts" will certainly not replace the articles, I do think that taken individually there might be pieces which can be introduced as points of discussion, and so this can be seen as Ret. Prof's "ideal" article. I am not saying that we need to do this for Ret. Prof, but we can explain in a nice way that this isn't how the changes will come about if they do end up meeting consensus after being discussed. That doesn't mean he can't have userspace to think about and refactor those changes before proposing them on the talk page. '''[[User:Andrevan|Andrevan]]'''[[User_talk:Andrevan|@]] 07:15, 26 July 2014 (UTC)

::No, I am not "out of line". I made a suggestion and requested comments. I was in no way assuming bad faith; I was trying to minimize the potential for a misunderstanding. Feel free to apologize to me for your bad faith assumption that I was doing otherwise. Btw, I'm glad to see someone uninvolved taking an interest on Ret.Prof's behalf. [[User:Ignocrates|Ignocrates]] ([[User talk:Ignocrates|talk]]) 19:35, 26 July 2014 (UTC)

:::When people don't know how to do things here, you're supposed to help them, not bully them away and blank their pages. '''[[User:Andrevan|Andrevan]]'''[[User_talk:Andrevan|@]] 01:39, 27 July 2014 (UTC)