User talk:STATicVapor - Wikipedia
1 person in discussion
 | In order to keep a conversation together rather than spread over multiple talk pages, if you leave me a message here, I will respond here. |
Thanks from the Wiki and I Victuallers (talk) 00:02, 4 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
Hello. I went on Rick Ross' page to check out his biography and saw that a mug shot is being used for his photo. I'm sure that this wasn't intentional, but it just doesn't seem appropriate to use for an artist. I found this on Google Images; not sure if you can use it but it seems better, and more respectful.
Thanks!
Vigelande12 (talk) 01:22, 4 March 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vigelande12 (talk • contribs) 01:17, 4 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
- @Vigelande12: There is a discussion on the talk page a few months ago where it was deemed okay. It is basically the only free image we have of his full face and it is not obviously a mugshot. STATic message me! 05:40, 4 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
Why do you keep messing with my page? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.73.35.53 (talk) 05:36, 4 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
- Stop adding fake content, it is not your page. STATic message me! 05:40, 4 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Yeezus you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Prism -- Prism (talk) 15:01, 4 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
You will stop with your harassment now. Enough. Reece Leonard (talk) 06:59, 5 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
- @Reece Leonard: Laughing out loud. Sounds like the pot calling the kettle black. I have never harassed you, sorry try again. This is the only harassment I see. STATic message me! 07:03, 5 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
- You brought all of that before an advisement board and they disagreed. Stop sending me baseless messages and warnings. I don't care what you think about me, but seriously grow up and leave me alone. Reece Leonard (talk) 07:12, 5 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
- @Reece Leonard: Disagreed? User:Homeostasis07 did you see any "disagreement" at all? The administrators completely agreed with us and practically laughed off your ridiculous remarks. When you edit war, they are not baseless and if you continue with the horrid editing you will be blocked. Sorry brodie, but the only one that needs growing up is you. STATic message me! 07:18, 5 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
- You have a seriously warped vision of a board that ultimately decided that your claims against me were baseless and declined your request. What the hell is a brodie? Look, enough. Seriously. We're done discussing this and I'm done interacting with you unless I have no alternative. Reece Leonard (talk) 08:10, 5 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
- I will reiterate: Do not interact with me unless it is absolutely necessary to do so as I want to avoid these kinds of disagreements in the future. You are not allowed to remove other people's messages from talk pages, but I refuse to engage in your attempts to draw me into another argument so that you can have a second attempt at banning me. Enough. Do not interact with me again. Reece Leonard (talk) 09:19, 5 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
- @Reece Leonard: See WP:NPA which you continue to violate, the removal was clearly justified. STATic message me! 09:25, 5 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
- I'm just going to point out this instance where you attempted to chastise me for doing exactly what you just did for the sole purpose of highlighting your hypocrisy before never speaking to you again: X Reece Leonard (talk) 09:32, 5 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
- @Reece Leonard: That comment is barley uncivil, it is not a full blown personal attack like every single one of your damn posts. At least that person was commenting on the content not the contributors. Please do not ever do that again. I am so sick of seeing you saying my name in every single discussion. For you to think this is appropriate: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] is ridiculous. STATic message me! 16:34, 5 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
- You're choosing to interpret my actions as personal attacks. I think you've misinterpreted what I was trying to do with those messages on those user's pages. I wasn't trying to slander you at all; I was trying to combat the argument that they were going to see on those pages that you made about my alleged bias. That was it. I only mention your name when you're involved in the discussion at hand. Let me also point out that you were the one to initiate the "commenting on users instead of content" when you accused me of not having a WP:NPOV for no reason at the start of the conversation over the critical consensus on the Artpop page. Reece Leonard (talk) 16:48, 5 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
- @Reece Leonard: No if you read WP:NPA you would know they are. I am not misinterpreting anything, you were blatantly slandering me across multiple pages. You need to learn to comment on content not contributors. And why do you think I accused you of not having a NPOV? Because you do not and it is blatantly obvious. But do not comment here again, I am done replying to you. STATic message me! 17:47, 5 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
- Reece, whether your remarks were intended as personal attacks or not, this does seem to be a case of harassment on your part, which includes repeatedly doing things towards others that they find irritating. XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 19:14, 5 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
- @Reece Leonard: Reece, just STOP! No admin ever agreed with your opinion. Anyone who wants to read the entire thing can do so here. That thread was simply automatically archived after 36 hours of inactivity. DO NOT USE IT AS AN EXCUSE TO HARASS OTHER USERS! Homeostasis07 (talk) 01:36, 6 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
- @Homeostasis07: Yeah good thing I brought the discussion back. Glad I am not the only one seeing this blatant harassment. How much you wanna bet he will violate either the topic or interaction ban before its over? I guess we will just have to watch for sockpuppets. STATic message me! 01:44, 6 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
- @STATicVapor: Agreed. Whatever the outcome of that discussion will be, Artpop and several other Gaga articles will still be on my Watchlist. My Wiki Watchlist is practically my home page: so any suspicious/unusual activity will immediately be reported. Homeostasis07 (talk) 01:55, 6 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
- @Reece Leonard: No if you read WP:NPA you would know they are. I am not misinterpreting anything, you were blatantly slandering me across multiple pages. You need to learn to comment on content not contributors. And why do you think I accused you of not having a NPOV? Because you do not and it is blatantly obvious. But do not comment here again, I am done replying to you. STATic message me! 17:47, 5 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
- You're choosing to interpret my actions as personal attacks. I think you've misinterpreted what I was trying to do with those messages on those user's pages. I wasn't trying to slander you at all; I was trying to combat the argument that they were going to see on those pages that you made about my alleged bias. That was it. I only mention your name when you're involved in the discussion at hand. Let me also point out that you were the one to initiate the "commenting on users instead of content" when you accused me of not having a WP:NPOV for no reason at the start of the conversation over the critical consensus on the Artpop page. Reece Leonard (talk) 16:48, 5 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
- @Reece Leonard: That comment is barley uncivil, it is not a full blown personal attack like every single one of your damn posts. At least that person was commenting on the content not the contributors. Please do not ever do that again. I am so sick of seeing you saying my name in every single discussion. For you to think this is appropriate: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] is ridiculous. STATic message me! 16:34, 5 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
- I'm just going to point out this instance where you attempted to chastise me for doing exactly what you just did for the sole purpose of highlighting your hypocrisy before never speaking to you again: X Reece Leonard (talk) 09:32, 5 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
- You have a seriously warped vision of a board that ultimately decided that your claims against me were baseless and declined your request. What the hell is a brodie? Look, enough. Seriously. We're done discussing this and I'm done interacting with you unless I have no alternative. Reece Leonard (talk) 08:10, 5 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
- @Reece Leonard: Disagreed? User:Homeostasis07 did you see any "disagreement" at all? The administrators completely agreed with us and practically laughed off your ridiculous remarks. When you edit war, they are not baseless and if you continue with the horrid editing you will be blocked. Sorry brodie, but the only one that needs growing up is you. STATic message me! 07:18, 5 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
The article Yeezus you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Yeezus for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Prism -- Prism (talk) 18:31, 5 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
12 Hunna isnt in 808 Mafia, I been trying to contact you, Im the one thats actually In 808 Mafia. hes been kicked out. Josephdavinci (talk) 06:30, 6 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
- @Josephdavinci: Since Wikipedia runs on verifiablity, I would need to see reliable third party sources or official posts from one of the founders Southside/Lex Lugar to support your changes. We need to be able to detonate that you are actually officially in the group and not just a fan trying to get your name there to promote yourself. STATic message me! 06:37, 6 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
Tarentino verified it actuallyJosephdavinci (talk) 06:50, 6 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
Its in my direct messages on twitter how can I link it — Preceding unsigned comment added by Josephdavinci (talk • contribs) 07:09, 6 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
Okay so I know you will just tell me that any single that appears on the album and is available to purchase is official BUT...Dark Horse/Walking On Air were available for purchase as a promotional singles because they were simply available to purchase off the albums preorder. Break the Bank was released this way as well/has no radio release date so that can only mean that it's technically a promtional single too, right? BlaccCrab (talk) 10:36, 6 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
- @BlaccCrab: No "Break the Bank" was released for digital download as a single as seen here. This is referenced on the album and song article. STATic message me! 20:45, 6 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
Walking On air has that too, it's just a link to an individual song off amazon [6]. They were both released the same way, a song to download off of itunes pre-preorder BlaccCrab (talk) 20:52, 6 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
Ok so the link you gave me is just a link to the track off the album but I found the link to the single. How does a song being released on amazon qualify it as a single? a 6 minute track that never gets sent to radio can't possibly be considered an official single BlaccCrab (talk) 20:59, 6 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
- @BlaccCrab: Yes it was released on there February 17, 2014 in the link I gave you, prior to the album's release as a retail single in the format of digital download. Promotional singles are only song's released for free or only available with the iTunes pre-order. If they have a separate download page they are a single. As for the weird way pop articles work sometimes see WP:WAX and yes a six minute song that may be sent to radio is a single as I just explained. In no way is a radio release required to be a "official single". STATic message me! 21:46, 6 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
[7] this is a video on youtube that explains everything I've been telling you. I believe you have awful intentions to hide the truth (which is the man was born August 30, 1978), for reason im unaware; maybe because your jealous. He was one of three underage boys in 1994 to be sent to federal prison. Ten years later, when he got out, leaves him in his twenties. Ten years after that, which is current time, puts him in his thirties! im not sure of your personal reasons but please stop lying on his Wikipedia page it is hurtful to his fans. Don't know if this will change your opinion you seem dead set on ageing this man. But if authenticity means anything to you the honest truth will be displayed. 173.71.187.68 (talk) 17:47, 7 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
- That explains nothing. In the source does he say that he was born on August 30, 1978? Then it is WP:OR. There are two sources cited in the article that place him as older. You are coming up with these bad faith accusations and I am not trying to "age him" at all. According to the NY Post he was 37 in 2010 [8]. STATic message me! 18:07, 7 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
I didn't meant to be annoying on the page 'Yours Truly' I just didn't know... The reason I tried it a second time is that I thought there was something wrong with my internet. Sorry Flumen-fulmen (talk) 18:49, 7 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
- @Flumen-fulmen: No problem at all, you are a beginner, mistakes are completely understandable. STATic message me! 19:14, 7 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
Are you looking at the review comments Static? —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 16:08, 8 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
- @IndianBio: Sorry for lag, I shall get to them either early in the day today or tomorrow, so if you would like feel free to detail another section. STATic message me! 17:11, 8 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
Stop playing the enforcer and stop bullying people as a meatpuppett. GabeMc (talk|contribs) 18:34, 8 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
- @GabeMc: There is no bullying going on at all, you obviously just do not understand guidelines and policies. Referring to a single revert as "bullying" is just beyond ridiculous. Please understand WP:BRD and you obviously have no idea what a meatpuppet even is... This message is just littered with inaccurate libel.STATic message me! 18:48, 8 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
- You reverted my at other pages where Dan pinged you; it will not be difficult to show that you meatpuppett for him at numerous pages, so stop being a bully. GabeMc (talk|contribs) 18:50, 8 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
- @GabeMc: Yes this is Wikipedia, you will be reverted quite often just as everyone is, try to get used to it. And the hilarity in that thought is becoming. It would take me more than two hands to count how many times me and Dan have reverted eachother in the four years I have been here. I only commented on that page (did not revert anything), since you obviously refused to abide by a WP:NPOV on that article and as many other editors told you, you were wrong. But please I do not want you to harass me all the time like you do Dan, so in the future just abide by WP:BRD and discuss controversial changes. Most certainly do not change any guides, guidelines or policies to fit your opinion. And after you just vandalized my talk page, do not post on it again or I will report you to WP:ANI. STATic message me! 18:59, 8 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
The article Yours Truly (Ariana Grande album) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Yours Truly (Ariana Grande album) for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Zanimum -- Zanimum (talk) 21:41, 8 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
So why do u keep changing it back to your incorrect info?????? Its about Big Dric, that's why Stretch produced it, that's why Stretch says before his verse, " I love u forever my nigga" who would think Stretch would say that about some dude he never met, from the West Coast.... the goal here is correct info, and youre posting mis-info. {{{unsigned|Chronos12713}
- @Chronos12713: Do you have reliable sources? STATic message me! 02:40, 9 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
- 1st I don't see any references or sources on your claim, 2nd in a Live Squad YouTube video a Live Squad member speaks on it 3rd it just makes more sense, cuz why would Stretch say I love u, etc and if it was a tribute to Johnny Is dude, wouldn't Johnny J have been the producer?
- @Chronos12713: First sign all your posts on talk pages with four "~" markings as in: ~~~~. Second, it is not "my claim" I barley started watch listing the page last week, even though I have had the CD for years. I also do not see any producer credit in the article for Stretch. STATic message me! 03:34, 9 March 2014 (UTC)Chronos12713 (talk) 05:54, 9 March 2014 (UTC)ok sorry about the sign in thing I'm not very tech-savy... to follow up, on Stretch's wikipedia page it lists him as producer of the song... and I don't know how helpful the YouTube video would be but its called "Remembering Tupac stories from the Live Squad DVD, most of the vid is Stretch's brother Majesty, but within the first minute or two another member speaks on Big Dric, he gives an account of Pac's interaction with him and it even has some video footage of himReply
It's a bit of fun, you make it out like I've committed one of the most heinous acts a human can do, calm down. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BrettRickles (talk • contribs) 03:53, 9 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
- @BrettRickles: The message is templated. If you plan to vandalize Biographies of living people in serious ways such as changing vital information such as their name or birthday without sources, you would quickly be blocked if you continued. STATic message me! 03:59, 9 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
I have started a discussion on the talk page for the FOX Animated Universe to keep it. You can find the discussion right here. Thanks and have a good day. - TreCoolGuy (talk) 09 March 2014 (UTC)
hey why are you wrning me?? there arealot of reference links in wikipedia then why areyou deleting my links?/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Awais66 (talk • contribs) 20:42, 9 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
- @Awais66: Because you are spamming many articles with links to this random website, that is why. STATic message me! 20:48, 9 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
Hello, this is me, firehawksal19. I will try to comprehensive and open minded as I can. The reason why I changed the music genres in Escape the Fate's Wikipedia article is because their music sounds more than what the article described it as before I edited the page. Back then, before I had a Wikipedia account, I went on their page and not only were they listed as "Post-hardcore", "hard rock" and "emo", they were also listed as "Alternative metal" and "metalcore". I've listened to their music, and not only do I consider their music as post-hardcore, I also believe they are a heavy metal/alternative metal/metalcore band as well. I know it seems stupid, but that why I edited the page. Feel free to reply back to me if you need to.
-firehawksal19. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Firehawksal19 (talk • contribs) 21:17, 9 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
- @Firehawksal19: That is what we call original research, what is listed in the infobox now is what is sourced to be their genres in the article body. STATic message me! 21:22, 9 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
Static are you online? Need to ask a favor. —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 14:27, 10 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
- @IndianBio: I am now, do you still need something? STATic message me! 19:19, 10 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
- @STATicVapor:, the issue with Reece must be fresh in your memory, was just gonna ask you that in the Indian film articles we have an exact same user refusing to come to terms with consensus when the whole 99.99% of the community is against him/her. The user is blatantly disrupting articles and removing sourced content. May I tempt you a penny for your thoughts? —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 06:11, 12 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
- @IndianBio: I noticed that discussion at the WikiProject. I have had a disputes with the user in question and completely agree with your opinion on him/her. They are blatantly disruptive and uncivil, and does not have a strong grasp of WP:CONSENSUS. If you or someone else decides to start a WP:ANI discussion that shows promise, then I would happily comment on it. STATic message me! 06:22, 12 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
- Thanks, this is really going in a nasty direction and it seems the user is enjoying it. I really do not want this to blow up like the issue with Reece. :( —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 06:24, 12 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
- Yeah I can understand that. However, now that everything is official and closed on that, I will be happy to no longer have to worry or comment on that user again. As I know you watch and edit Lady Gaga pages exponentially more than I do, if you see Reece editing any of them or any suspicious new accounts or IPs, let me know of them so I may report them to an administrator. Outside of any possible violations of their topic ban, I would prefer not discussing that user to avoid any scrutiny due to the interaction ban (yay no more harassment), which includes discussing the user. STATic message me! 06:33, 12 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
- Yeah forget about that, come to the Magna Carta page. :) —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 06:46, 12 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
How do you cite a source when you edit a page? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jacob Sudduth (talk • contribs) 19:24, 10 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
- @Jacob Sudduth: See WP:CITE, it should fully explain it to you. STATic message me! 23:07, 10 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
Considering that the site has been in operation for over a decade, evolved from the original 1wrestling.com, and are staffed with guys whom once were employed in ECW, and have many sources within WWE, TNA, ROH, and across the indy lanscape, I would like to know how they are considered "unreliable"? They've even had Tod Gordon, Bruno Sammartino, Jim Cornette, and even Triple H on the site. And currently they have Mike "Nova/Simon Dean" Bucci and Paul London as occasional contributors. They are not tabloid writers, but reputable journalist with actual resumes in pro wrestling, and current contacts that include active performers and employees in the companies they report.
So, can you explain to me how they are unreliable when just about every story they break or report are 100% true? And in the even that they post erroneous information, they have the class to publicly apologize for it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Risephoenixrise (talk • contribs) 22:06, 10 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
- @Risephoenixrise: I never once said in that discussion that they were unreliable, I believe you messaged the wrong person. STATic message me! 23:09, 10 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
I posted updates on the CM Punk entry, which were reverted with this reference:
(-1,275) . . (Reverted 3 edits by Risephoenixrise (talk): Unreliable sources. (TW)) (undo | thank) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Risephoenixrise (talk • contribs)
- @Risephoenixrise: I was referring to Wrestlezone and that PWinsider is only allowed to be used for noncontroversial things such as match results, not rumors or speculation. STATic message me! 03:01, 11 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
Again, your perception of that site are not reality. They are not in the business of rumors or speculation, they have posted legitimate news for over a decade--and even longer when they were staffed under Bob Ryder and Joey Styles's 1wrestling.com. They are a reliable source. If they weren't a reliable source, then why does Mike Bucci and Paul London contribute to their site? If they weren't a reliable source then why did Jim Cornette, Bruno Sammartino, and Triple H (yes, THAT Triple H) agree to do audio shoot interviews with the site? They have sources that they double and triple-check that are employed within WWE and TNA, and every organization they write a story on. The story that I posted of Punk's walkout was not a rumor whatsoever, as been proven in the weeks that preceeded it. The story actually happened, and the source was indeed a credible one because the events I described were 100% true. There was no rumor involved.
The only speculation that exists, with all due respect, is your speculation that their work is not legitimate news. They have resumes in the business and report NOTHING unless they have a story that can be double-sourced and has legs. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Risephoenixrise (talk • contribs) 03:51, 11 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
just click on the song title, have you seen it Andy12332199 (talk)
Dear STATic VaPor,
I would like to inform you of the Professional Wrestler Rob Van Dam and why he has taken 'time off' from World Wrestling Entertainment since 7th October 2013. Many superstars which perform in Professional Wrestling tend to take 'time off' every once in a while however their contracts are not terminated. Stipulations in their contracts provide them with limited amount of appearances over a certain time period, may it be over a month or a year. When companies like the WWE announce their superstars are taking 'time off' it usually means they are going to have vacation time or rehabilitate from an injury however the company informs the public of this through their official website and social media. After RVD lost to Alberto Del Rio at Battleground he had to take 'time off' due to his written contract he signed with the company. These stipulations have always been present in not only WWE but many other Professional Wrestling companies. For example, WWE Wrestler CM Punk has taken 'time off' although he still has a legal contract to the company. His still remains a WWE employee however he has taken upon himself to have his vacation now although it is very troublesome for the company with Wrestlemania 30, the biggest wrestling showcase on the planet set to take place a month from now.
It pains me to say this but the only link I could find which supported my information on RVD's 'time off' has come from Bleachrreport. http://bleacherreport.com/articles/1806696-rob-van-dam-disputes-online-reports-claims-hell-be-back-in-wwe
The article itself details of RVD apparently having a dispute with the booking team and how he has been handled since returning to the company. However this is not the case and he confirms these reports of mistreatment are nonsense, which everyone believes they are. Referencing RVD's absence with WWE.com is not enough in depth news on his hiatus from the company for over 3 months. I have worked with a number of Professional Wrestling promotions such as SMASH, Chikara and Dragon Gate USA. Reviewing contracts of such popular talents as Yoshihiro Tajiri, Dave Finlay, Yoshihiro Asai and Masanori Murakawa. My knowledge of the Professional Wrestling business and how it works are of a very high standard and has been for many years.
Thank you for taking your time to read this.
Deluxe Editor.
Deluxe Editor (talk) 00:56, 11 March 2014 (UTC)11/03/14Reply
- @Deluxe Editor: Yes I realize that, but reliable sources must be cited for content additions and according to WP:PW/SG, BleacherReport is considered unreliable. STATic message me! 01:28, 11 March 2014 (UTC)|Reply
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article My Name Is My Name you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of XXSNUGGUMSXX -- XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 05:51, 11 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
He finished his edit 3 minutes before me and all he did was write background info. I had the infobox, album artwork, and tracklist all he did was jot down some information he got off a fan website after I had already previewed the page so there was an edit conflict from 3 little paragraphs he wrote. I'm tired of you undoing everything I do BlaccCrab (talk) 16:45, 11 March 2014 (UTC)contribs) 16:42, 11 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
Oh yeah, not to metion NONE of his work that he scibbled down in 5 minutes is still left on the page after more editors came in to improve the article while my tracklist/genres/introduction is still there. BlaccCrab (talk) 16:51, 11 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
- @BlaccCrab: Sorry for the misunderstanding, I was just about to message you and restore it. I was busy this morning and I did not look that into it. After my edit that other user came in and cleaned it up. I believe you do deserve credit for "creating the page". STATic message me! 16:57, 11 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
Thank you, and my apologies if I snapped a little. It's just I worked on making that for like an hour last night and it was my first album page lol BlaccCrab (talk) 17:03, 11 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
- @BlaccCrab: That's good, you should take around an hour or so to create pages, then you come out with a good sized and informative article (my last creation). Album pages do take longer to create then song pages though, and BLPs take even longer. But longer you edit here you will get even better and faster at creating them. STATic message me! 17:34, 11 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
I found this article on a record producer that was marked for deletion. It said if I was going to work on it then I could. So I am working on it but you marked it for deletion again. Is it possible that we could work on it together. I found some things on this guy and he is really good. I mean from what I see he has done tons of work From the US to the UK and more. Just wondering if you could sort of help me out. I would love to have this article under my belt. I made a few small edits here and there but this one I spent time on. — Preceding unsigned comment added by LennyPerez44 (talk • contribs) 18:46, 11 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
- @LennyPerez44: I believe you should create the article at User: LennyPerez44/Focus The Producer to avoid it being deleted an additional time. From a google search I could not find enough coverage in reliable third party sources like XXL, MTV, The Source, BET, etc that would merit an article per the notability guideline at WP:MUSICBIO. However, feel free to work on it at User: LennyPerez44/Focus The Producer until he meets WP:GNG and/or WP:MUSICBIO. STATic message me! 18:55, 11 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
- @STATicVapor: Thanks... that is a great explanation of what I need to find in order to complete an article on a record producer. I really appreciate that information.
The article My Name Is My Name you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:My Name Is My Name for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of XXSNUGGUMSXX -- XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 23:41, 11 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
Do you and @Winkelvi: sense a quack with IP 2605:e000:96c0:af00:dc19:c1f:cb9b:d9 on Seth MacFarlane or am I making to early of a call? Winkelvi has an SPI here and I'm tempted to add it but am not sure. XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 03:41, 12 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
- @XXSNUGGUMSXX: I actually thought the same thing, but I think it might be a bit too soon to say. If they continue editing articles such as Seth's, Mike Judge, Trey Parker, Neil Patrick Harris etc, then I would say definitely report them. On another note, thanks a lot for the Good Article review, I have been waiting on that one for a while. I really appreciate you taking the time to review it. STATic message me! 03:47, 12 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
- My pleasure. Let's wait for what else that IP does. What makes me really suspicious is the "2605" range that was previously proven to be Monterrosa sock IP. XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 03:50, March 12, 2014 (UTC)
- Exactly what I thought, but agree it's too early to say. He's getting a little more sly in how he edits as a sock. Looks like he now will test for a few days with IP edits and account edits to see if anyone's on to him. Then the edits occur more frequently if he thinks he's in the clear. -- Winkelvi ● ✉ ✓ 03:54, 12 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
- @XXSNUGGUMSXX: @Winkelvi: Definitely has been attempting to be more slick with it. Yeah and once he edits more, then they get blocked. I do not know what sockmasters get out of wasting their time with stuff like this, it gets quite annoying after they do this for months on end.. STATic message me! 03:58, 12 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
- To think that only two months ago Monterrosa had a chance to edit freely after a week without wiki activity and completely wasted that chance by attempting to evade the one-week block, which grew into a three-week for one attempt of evasion and then indefinite for another. Not sure how much longer this will go on for if it hasn't already stopped. Winkelvi has been quite diligent in seeking out the numerous socks made since..... XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 04:05, March 12, 2014 (UTC)
- I know, evading that block was a huge mistake for them and yeah got to give credit to Winkelvi for weeding out all the socks this guy has made. STATic message me! 04:31, 12 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
- To think that only two months ago Monterrosa had a chance to edit freely after a week without wiki activity and completely wasted that chance by attempting to evade the one-week block, which grew into a three-week for one attempt of evasion and then indefinite for another. Not sure how much longer this will go on for if it hasn't already stopped. Winkelvi has been quite diligent in seeking out the numerous socks made since..... XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 04:05, March 12, 2014 (UTC)
Reading his article talk page comment, it's definitely him. -- Winkelvi ● ✉ ✓ 05:08, 12 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
Per the result of this ANI discussion you are now subject to a mutual interaction ban with User:Reece Leonard. This restriction has been logged at Wikipedia:Editing restrictions#Placed by the Wikipedia community, and violations will be subject to escalating blocks. This restriction can be appealed on AN/ANI no sooner than 6 months after its implementation, i.e. September 12, 2014. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 06:40, 12 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
The article Magna Carta Holy Grail you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Magna Carta Holy Grail for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of IndianBio -- IndianBio (talk) 06:51, 12 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
I have contested both your speedy deletion requests for Freaky Fortune and the other singer as representing a country at the worlds biggest music competition like Eurovision is instant notability. Regards,--BabbaQ (talk) 00:13, 13 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
relevant musician in Brazil.Dir3itista (talk) 02:17, 13 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
OK, I'm not being disruptive by editing professional wrestling articles. Some of the stuff I can't find sources for. It's not like I'm trolling or anything, I'm actually adding useful information. So please quit spamming up my talk page. Thanks! Jgera5 (talk) 15:11, 13 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
- @Jgera5: For about the fifth time, understand that adding original research or unsourced content is not okay and will get you blocked just as easy as trolling. Adding original research is disruptive, if you cannot find a reliable source for what you are adding, do not add it. Simple as that. I am not spamming anything, you are actually lucky I did not give you a final warning like you deserved. STATic message me! 15:22, 13 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
You need to provide sources directly next to your peaks as the sources provided do not support your peaks. You should never tell editors go here or there for your inserted peaks. You should learn to follow wikipedia's policies once and for all. Your edit, by the way, removes my sources that I provided for the peaks in the table of Other Charted Songs.--Harout72 (talk) 17:21, 13 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
- @Harout72: No I have not, read the edit for once. I cited the source and you are not reading the damn citation that is there. I did not remove a single citation that you added. Go to the source I cited and click enter. Use CTRL-F if you must, but the peaks are all there. STATic message me! 17:24, 13 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
- It doesn't bring up any result when you type in Rick Ross and also the name of the songs, "In Vein", or "Nobody". It does, however, when only Rick Ross is typed in. I wish you could start pointing these details out properly, before blindly reverting the entire page to a version that removes other sources, that editors provide carefully. If the peaks you add are in the sources other the main sources already provided on the discography pages, then you need to provide those additional sources. Do not expect anyone to go fetch them for you. This is simple verifiability.--Harout72 (talk) 17:37, 13 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
- @Harout72:Yes the database messes up like that, when you search for some artists it turns up no results, yet we have verification of multiple chartings. Same thing when you try to search both artist and song. This was not a blind revert like your edits were, the positions for Devil Is A Lie were on Billboard, which I thought was being used a citation, but I forgot you decided to mess up the whole article because Billboard was adjusting their website. The verifiable proof was provided in the diff you just provided, but how surprising you refuse to WP:AGF and remain civil like usual and you just blindly revert more times when content was clearly cited here, yet you reverted again. STATic message me! 20:35, 13 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
Why were they deleted? They are a legitamate band. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.215.171.5 (talk) 20:54, 13 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
- @209.215.171.5: See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LEL Brothas, legitimacy is not the problem, it is notability. STATic message me! 01:54, 14 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
Hi, I apologise. This is a school IP address, so occasionally things like this will happen. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:630:34:0:0:0:0:100 (talk) 14:59, 14 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
What source do you have that states that Juelz Santana was born in 1982? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dodge1991 (talk • contribs) 02:13, 17 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
- @Dodge1991: It is only already cited in the article. STATic message me! 02:59, 17 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
In regards to this, I think instead of reverting immediately when you see something added by a usually reliable editor, you need to see if it checks out. Just my two cents. CRRaysHead90 | #WelcomeHome 04:56, 18 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
- @CRRaysHead90: Do you know how many fake themes have been added over the last few months? Per our policy WP:V, all content must be backed by a reliable source when added the first time. I was offline for a few hours and there were almost 50 new edits on the page, including some by multiple editors that frequently add false or unsourced content (no need to list them), so I had no idea who had added it. I just noticed that new addition. Sorry for the confusion. STATic message me! 05:06, 18 March 2014 (UTC)Reply