User talk:Saboteurest: Difference between revisions - Wikipedia

Line 48:

You are welcome to return to editing when your block expires. However be aware that if this behaviour continues then you may end up being blocked again. I advise you to read up on Wikipedia's policies and co-operate with other editors instead of battling against them. [[User:Canterbury Tail|<b style="color: Blue;">Canterbury Tail</b>]] [[User talk:Canterbury Tail|<i style="color: Blue;">talk</i>]] 18:57, 15 February 2018 (UTC)

{{unblock reviewed | 1= I have been [[WP:FOLLOWING|followed]] by an editor ([[User:Canterbury Tail|Canterbury Tail]]) on multiple articles. After making an edit this editor mysteriously appears and adds unhelpful and conflicting edits to the same article which they have zero history of ever editing. This user admitted to following me on their own talk page after I warned them that I would report them if it continued. I provided numerous references for the infortmation in question. This editor then continued to troll me and claimed they were primary source references, which this does not fall under. Then this editor without notice, without following any procedures, and without involving a 3rd party, blocks me from editing. I believe this editor blocked me from editing so that I could not report him for [[WP:FOLLOWING]] me which I was in the process of doing. This is not only an unjust block but a complete conflict of interest. [[User:Saboteurest|Saboteurest]] ([[User talk:Saboteurest#top|talk]]) 19:17, 15 February 2018 (UTC) | decline = I have checked your editing history, and can confirm the following. You have consistently taken an [[WP:BATTLEGROUND|aggressively adversarial approach]] to editors with whom you disagree, and have persistently been uncivil, aggressive, and contemptuous towards such editors. You have been making retaliatory edits. You have used words such a "troll" and "vandalism" to refer to editors acting in perfectly good faith just because you don't like their edits. You have repeatedly claimed that another editor has been banned when there is no evidence that is so, and when asked to either provide evidence to support your claim or retract it you merely repeated the claim, still without substantiating it. You have made threats to editors with whom you have disagreed. You have made inaccurate statements about what cited sources do or don't say to support your editing. That is not how Wikipedia works, and taking that kind of approach is disruptive. <small>''The editor who uses the pseudonym''</small> "[[User:JamesBWatson|JamesBWatson]]" ([[User talk:JamesBWatson#top|talk]]) 20:47, 16 February 2018 (UTC)}}

{{unblock reviewed|I have been [[WP:FOLLOWING|followed]] by an editor ([[User:Canterbury Tail|Canterbury Tail]]) on multiple articles. After making an edit this editor mysteriously appears and adds unhelpful and conflicting edits to the same article which they have zero history of ever editing. This user admitted to following me on their own talk page after I warned them that I would report them if it continued. I provided numerous references for the infortmation in question. This editor then continued to troll me and claimed they were primary source references, which this does not fall under. Then this editor without notice, without following any procedures, and without involving a 3rd party, blocks me from editing. I believe this editor blocked me from editing so that I could not report him for [[WP:FOLLOWING]] me which I was in the process of doing. This is not only an unjust block but a complete conflict of interest. [[User:Saboteurest|Saboteurest]] ([[User talk:Saboteurest#top|talk]]) 22:45, 16 February 2018 (UTC)|decline=Re-posting the same request again after it was reviewed won't work. See also [[WP:NOTTHEM]]. [[User:Huon|Huon]] ([[User talk:Huon|talk]]) 22:51, 16 February 2018 (UTC)}}

:Also, please do not remove declined unblock requests while the block is in effect. See [[WP:REMOVE]]. [[User:Huon|Huon]] ([[User talk:Huon|talk]]) 22:51, 16 February 2018 (UTC)