User talk:SahabAliwadia - Wikipedia

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Zara Noor Abbas is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zara Noor Abbas until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Saqib (talk) 17:56, 27 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

I don't see Roman Empire 29 (talk · contribs) posting any defamatory or libellous material on Alif Allah Aur Insaan (TV series). I think you need to stop giving people invalid warnings. --Saqib (talk) 18:01, 27 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

@Saqib: It is only because you have your big eyes on me and forget to look after other users. Well first see then ask. And if you don't find, I am telling you. He wrote "Hamiz burki as uncle" and something like that in the cast of Alif Allah which is libellous because it is not real. Don't do this mistake again. Thanks 😡 SahabAli^{говорити} 11:39, 5 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

You have nominated at least two users for adminship without checking with them if they are willing to become admins. Both users withdraw their nominations as a result. I strongly suggest you to check with the user you want to nominate for adminship before you make their entry or otherwise it would be considered disruptive editing. --Saqib (talk) 20:38, 28 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

@Saqib: Blah Blah Blah! What you want me to do? SahabAli^{говорити} 11:41, 5 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Any more of that and you'll lose access to this talk page. You still have access solely so you can show, at some point in the future, that you should be unblocked. --Yamla (talk) 12:22, 5 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Unfortunately, as soon as your previous block expired, you contained the very same behavior that I outlined here. Here, you gave an IP editor an "only warning" for "vandalism". His only edit to the article is not a vandalism. I told you to familiarize yourself with WP:VANDALISM, but you failed to do so. Also, here you accused an editor for making "defamatory or libellous" edits, althout there is nothing of that kind in their edits. I also noted that you nominated two other editors for administrators without reading WP:RfA (it clearly says If you wish to nominate someone else, check with them before making the nomination page). Here you nominated for deletion an the same article that you already nominated a month ago, claiming that other editors were "mistaken", and then you closed the same discussion as "keep" less than 24 hour later. All this (and more) shows that you are not willing nor able to stop your disruptive behavior of for which you were already blocked. Vanjagenije (talk) 21:45, 28 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Might I add to this behavioural trend – for the benefit of Vanjagenije and Yunshui – this Afd, which you renominated within one month of the previous Afd having been closed as a keep. I was thankful that you chose to heed my advice and withdrew the nomination. Your editing, as listed above, has been quite disruptive. I really don't know how you'll respond, but a good start would be to voluntarily stick to areas where you might make few, critical mistakes. If you make it past this indef, feel free to ask me about how to traverse this world without making too many mistakes. Warmly. Lourdes 17:31, 29 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

@JSFarman: I've been blocked for some another reason but like if you improve this article and take help of others SahabAli^{говорити} 11:35, 5 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

Please be aware that your signature uses deprecated <font> tags, which are causing Obsolete HTML tags lint errors. Your signature is also causing Tidy bug affecting font tags wrapping links.

You are encouraged to change

<span><font color="#3D7D0C">[[User:SahabAliwadia|'''SahabAli''']]</font><sup><font color="#045315">[[User talk:SahabAliwadia|'''говорити''']]</font></sup></span> → SahabAli^{говорити}

to

[[User:SahabAliwadia|<span style="color: #3D7D0C">'''SahabAli'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:SahabAliwadia|<span style="color: #045315">'''говорити'''</span>]]</sup> → SahabAli^{говорити}

Respectfully, Anomalocaris (talk) 18:35, 26 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Philipp Budeikin is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Philipp Budeikin until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. 8==8 Boneso (talk) 23:10, 31 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Catherine Hettinger, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:35, 28 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hello, SahabAliwadia. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Catherine Hettinger".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 12:02, 27 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Asim Azhar, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:22, 14 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

The exact text of my decline message at UTRS is as follows: "As you still have access to your talk page, and as there is no private information associated with your appeal, please post your unblock request to your user talk page for administrator review. You can follow the guide at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Guide_to_appealing_blocks." --Yamla (talk) 18:38, 30 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for this :) SahabAli^{говорити} 19:06, 30 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Vanjagenije It's been 12 days since my unblock request :( please have a look... Sorry for mentioning actually some years ago administrators used to be fast in responding to unblock requests... But now almost 2 weeks have passed and no response..what has happened to users... :( SahabAli^{говорити} 18:21, 11 December 2020 (UTC)Reply