User talk:SoothingRelaxation - Wikipedia

1 person in discussion

Article Images

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 13:57, 7 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hi SoothingRelaxation! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cordless Larry (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

Hello, SoothingRelaxation, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Draft:Tara Smith did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need personal help ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome. I dream of horses (Contribs) Please notify me after replying off my talk page. Thank you. 03:46, 8 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tara Smith (developer) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Tara Smith (developer), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 22:29, 8 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Draft: Tara Smith, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. AFC decline notices say that they should not be removed. That is because they provide a history for the reviewers. Do not remove them. Robert McClenon (talk) 22:30, 8 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. MarnetteD|Talk 05:19, 10 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

@MarnetteD: Sorry, I thought he died! --SoothingRelaxation (talk) 05:20, 10 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

I've been refreshing my Google search for 15 minutes. IMO the death of someone with as big of a public profile as Baker would hit the news fairly quickly. That is a major reason why a source is needed. Regards. MarnetteD|Talk 05:26, 10 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Thanks! --SoothingRelaxation (talk) 05:28, 10 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

I just saw this kind person. Where did you get the information from? I can't see it online. Please add a reference or remove it. Whispyhistory (talk) 07:25, 10 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

A YouTube video is not a reliable source for referencing content in a biography of a living person - especially content that claims that the person has died. Please review Wikipedia's policy on biographies of living people and the references required, and please let me know if you have any questions. You can message me by visiting my user talk page. Thanks! ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 14:52, 10 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

@Oshwah: Thank you for letting me know! Plus, I'm your biggest fan! --SoothingRelaxation (talk) 16:43, 10 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

I appreciate the kind words. :-) Please don't hesitate to let me know if you have questions or need help with anything, and I'll be happy to lend a hand. Cheers - ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 17:14, 10 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Published April 6, 2016 by Charlotte Eyre - "Orchard Books is launching its new 7+ series fiction, Secret Princesses, at Bologna Book Fair. The publisher, which is part of Hachette Children’s Books, came up with the idea for the series with creative company Hot House Fiction. The series is written by a number of authors under the pseudonym Rosie Banks and will launch in June with four books - The Magic Necklace, Dolphin Adventure, Starlight Sleepover and Pop Princess - all priced at £4.99, followed by an extended special in the autumn. Next year, Orchard will publish two sets of four books and 2-3 specials. Castilian and Catalan rights to the first four books and the firsts pecial have already sold to Spanish publisher La Galera and more deals are expected to be signed in Bologna. Orchard is promoting the series through a partnership with fashion retailer Monsoon, which will stock the same dresses as the characters wear in the cover of the first book. Monsoon has also designed a friendship necklace, which Orchard will feature in a competition, and will have samplers of the books in its stores. Publisher Megan Larkin said her ambition is for Secret Princesses to be “number one in the market”.

Hello, you recently created Rosie Banks (author), which we know as a pseudonym from PG Wodehouse. "Rosie M. Banks is a recurring fictional character in the Jeeves and Drones Club stories of British author P. G. Wodehouse," and yet you've but in bio information on this stub as if Rosie Banks in Leicestershire exists? Can you explain on the Talk page Talk:Rosie Banks (author) please? In ictu oculi (talk) 11:19, 11 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rosie Banks (author) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rosie Banks (author) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DrKay (talk) 11:52, 11 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hello SoothingRelaxation,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Secret Princesses for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source, probably infringing copyright.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer. Template:Z166

Lithopsian (talk) 14:51, 11 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

@Lithopsian: I didn't create it! --SoothingRelaxation (talk) 17:46, 11 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

It used to be called Rosie Banks (author) before another editor moved it to its current title. Before that it was Draft:Rosie Banks (author), which you created.[1]. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 20:53, 11 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

@Oshwah: DrKay blocked me for no reason. Just because I removed a deletion tag off Chills (YouTuber). He is famous and has 5.33 million subscribers. I even added at least one reliable source. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCN64HIrZNqFQYZ2BuyY-4zg --SoothingRelaxation (talk) 20:50, 11 November 2020 (UTC)Reply